Studies on Paragonimus proliferus

›› 2004, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (2): 13-112.

• 学术争鸣 • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Studies on Paragonimus proliferus

ZHOU Ben-jiang
   

  1. Department of Parasitology,Kunming Medical College,Kunming,650031,China
  • Received:1900-01-01 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2004-04-30 Published:2004-04-30

PDF (PC)

Abstract: 　Objective To make identification between Paragonimus menglaensis and Paragonimus proliferus. Methods Crabs were collected from same area where P. proliferus and P. menglaensi were reported, metacercariae and excysted metacercariae were separated. Adult worms were collected from experimental infection and identified. Results The metacercaria is large, with an average size of (1.23±0.087)mm×(1.10±0.073)mm, covered with a thin and fragile cyst wall; the size of excysted metacercariae is (2.01±0.71)mm×((0.62)±0.12)mm, with irregular bough-like wrinkles excretory bladder resembling in front of ventral sucker, two pointed and slim distal ends of gut locate at 1/6 of the body from the tail end; the adult worm has large uterine mass, with an average length of 1/(4.2) of the whole body. The natural definitive host for P. proliferus is not monkeys, dogs, and cats, but rats. The metacercaria of the reported P. menglaensis has been mixed up with that of P. microrchis from the same crab, excysted metacercaria has been same to that of P. proliferus, and an immature worm has been mistakenly identified as its adult worm. Conclusion P. proliferus is a valid independent species, while P. menglaensis is a mis-identified, invalid one.

Key words: Paragonimus, classification, host-parasite relations