Analysis of malaria detection capability of laboratories in the districts of Shanghai during 2017—2019

doi:10.12140/j.issn.1000-7423.2021.03.007

Abstract

Abstract:

Objective To recheck the blood samples of malaria cases sent by district-level centers for disease control and prevention (CDC), in Shanghai Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention (SCDC), and analyze the review results, in order to provide a basis for improving the malaria diagnostic capability of district CDCs.Methods Blood smears and whole blood samples submitted by the district CDC malaria laboratories were rechecked by SCDC using microscopic examination and nuclear acid detection (nested PCR) during 2017—2019. Using the examination by SCDC as the standard, the positive and negative coincidence rates of microscopic examination, and the sensitivity and specificity of malaria nucleic acid detection performed in district CDC malaria laboratories were analyzed. In 2019, blind assessment of malaria nucleic acid tests was conducted for all district CDCs of each district.Results A total of 232 malaria samples were submitted by district CDCs for rechecking in 2017—2019, among them 225 were complete samples (containing both blood smear and whole blood samples), with a completeness rate of 99.1% (225/227). Of the 225 complete samples, 99 samples were from Jinshan District (44.0%); 35 from Jing’an District (15.6%); 17 from Pudong New District (7.6%); 15 from Hongkou District (6.7%); Qingpu District and Chongming District submitted the least numbers of samples (0 and 1, respectively); while other districts provided less than 6.0% of the samples. The recheck of 225 complete samples showed an overall coincidence rate, positive coincidence rate and negative coincidence rate being 96.0% (216/225), 98.8% (170/172) and 86.8% (46/53), respectively, and the coincidence rate of nucleic acid detection 88.8% (103/116). The district CDCs used the quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) method for nucleic acid detection, resulting in a sensitivity of 76.6% (85/111), which was significantly different from that of the nested PCR method used by SCDC (87.4%, 97/111) (P < 0.05). The specificity of the two nucleic acid detection methods was 100.0%. Comprehensive evaluation of the 225 samples by using the two detection methods showed that the coincidence rate of district CDCs was 96.9% (218/225), and the misjudgment rate was 3.1% (7/225), including 5 with qualitative errors and 2 with errors in species identification. In 2019, the overall correct detection rate of blind assessment of malaria nucleic acid by district CDCs was 97.5% (78/80). Specifically, the correct detection rate of P. falciparum sample was 94.1% (32/34), which was not significantly different from those of the other four types of samples (P. vivax, P.ovale, P. malariae and negative infection) (P > 0.05). Conclusion From 2017 to 2019, the malaria laboratories of district CDCs showed a strong capability of malaria microscopic examination, but the sensitivity of nuclear acid detection needs to be improved.

Key words: Malaria, Laboratory, Microscopic examination, Nucleic acid detection, Coincidence rate

CLC Number:

R531.3

ZHANG Yao-guang, JIANG Li, WANG Zhen-yu, ZHU Min, ZHU Qian, MA Xiao-jiang, WU Huan-yu. Analysis of malaria detection capability of laboratories in the districts of Shanghai during 2017—2019[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF PARASITOLOGY AND PARASITIC DISEASES, 2021, 39(3): 337-342.

Figures/Tables 4

Table 1

Table 2

Table 3

Table 4

References 10

[1]	World Health Organization. World malaria report 2020[R]. Geneva: WHO, 2020:18, 20.
[2]	Zhu M, Cai L, Wu HY, et al. Mid-term assessment report of malaria elimination action plan in Shanghai[J]. Chin Trop Med, 2018,18(4):297-302. (in Chinese)
	( 朱民, 蔡黎, 吴寰宇, 等. 上海市消除疟疾行动计划中期评估报告[J]. 中国热带医学, 2018,18(4):297-302.)
[3]	World Health Organization. Guidelines for the treatment of malaria: diagnosis of malaria (2010)[M]. Geneva: WHO, 2010.
[4]	Snounou G, Singh B. Nested PCR analysis of Plasmodium parasites[J]. Methods Mol Med, 2002,72:189-203.
[5]	National Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Workbook of malaria diagnosis reference laboratory[S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2011:83. (in Chinese)
	( 中国疾病预防控制中心寄生虫病预防控制所. 疟疾诊断参比实验室工作手册[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2011:83.)
[6]	National Health and Planning Commission of the People’s Republic of China. WS 259-2015 Diagnosis of malaria[S]. Beijing: Standards Presss of China, 2016. (in Chinese)
	( 中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会. WS 259-2015 疟疾的诊断[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2016.)
[7]	Wang ZY, Jiang L, Zhang YG, et al. Comparative analysis of malaria detection ability of laboratories in Shanghai City from 2012 to 2015[J]. Chin J Schisto Control, 2017,29(3):305-309, 328. (in Chinese)
	( 王真瑜, 江莉, 张耀光, 等. 2012—2015年上海市实验室疟疾检测能力比较分析[J]. 中国血吸虫病防治杂志, 2017,29(3):305-309, 328.)
[8]	Li M, Xia ZG, Zhou SS. Analysis of inconsistence of Plasmodium detection in some malaria cases[J]. Chin J Parasitol Parasit Dis, 2019,37(4):464-471. (in Chinese)
	( 李美, 夏志贵, 周水森. 疟疾病例复核确认过程中检测结果不一致常见问题分析[J]. 中国寄生虫学与寄生虫病杂志, 2019,37(4):464-471.)
[9]	Kamau E, Tolbert LS, Kortepeter L, et al. Development of a highly sensitive genus-specific quantitative reverse transcriptase real-time PCR assay for detection and quantitation of Plasmodium by amplifying RNA and DNA of the 18S rRNA genes[J]. J Clin Microbiol, 2011,49(8):2946-2953. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00276-11
[10]	Li M, Wang ZY, Zhang T, et al. Exploration of using one-step reverse transcription PCR in detection of four species of human malaria parasites[J]. Chin J Parasitol Parasit Dis, 2016,34(6):500-505. (in Chinese)
	( 李美, 王真瑜, 张淘, 等. 一步反转录PCR技术在检测4种人疟原虫中的初步应用[J]. 中国寄生虫学与寄生虫病杂志, 2016,34(6):500-505.)

引物名称 Primer name	引物序列（5′→3′） Primer sequence （5′→3′）
rPLU1	TCAAAGATTAAGCCATGCAAGTGA
rPLU5	CCTGTTGTTGCCTTAAACTTC
rFAL1	TTAAACTGGTTTGGGAAAACCAAATATATT
rFAL2	ACACAATGAACTCAATCATGACTACCCGTC
rVIV1	CGCTTCTAGCTTAATCCACATAACTGATAC
rVIV2	ACTTCCAAGCCGAAGCAAAGAAAGTCCTTA
rMAL1	ATAACATAGTTGTACGTTAAGAATAACCGC
rMAL2	AAAATTCCCATGCATAAAAAATTATACAAA
rOVA1	ATCTCTTTTGCTATTTTTTAGTATTGGAGA
rPLU2	ATCTAAGAATTTCACCTCTGACATCTG
rPLU3	TTTTTATAAGGATAACTACGGAAAAGCTGT
rPLU4	TACCCGTCATAGCCATGTTAGGCCAATACC

区 District	样品数 No. samples	阳性样品数No. positive samples					阴性样品数 No. negative samples
区 District	样品数 No. samples	恶性疟原虫 P. falciparum	间日疟原虫 P. vivax	卵形疟原虫 P. ovale	三日疟原虫 P. malariae	混合感染 Mixed infection	阴性样品数 No. negative samples
金山Jinshan	99	77	3	8	2	1	8
静安Jing’an	35	20	3	8	4	0	0
浦东Pudong	17	14	1	1	0	0	1
虹口Hongkou	15	13	0	1	0	0	1
闵行Minhang	13	8	0	4	1	0	0
黄浦Huangpu	12	10	0	1	1	0	0
徐汇Xuhui	9	5	0	0	1	0	3
奉贤Fengxian	5	4	0	0	0	0	1
普陀Putuo	4	4	0	0	0	0	0
宝山Baoshan	4	2	1	0	1	0	0
嘉定Jiading	3	1	0	2	0	0	0
长宁Changning	3	3	0	0	0	0	0
松江Songjiang	3	3	0	0	0	0	0
杨浦Yangpu	2	2	0	0	0	0	0
崇明Chongming	1	1	0	0	0	0	0
青浦Qingpu	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
合计Total	225	167	8	25	10	1	14

	镜检Microscopic examination			PCR			综合评价Synthetical evaluation
年份 Year	镜检检测数 No. microscopic detection	符合数 No.coincidence	符合率% Coincidence rate/%	PCR检测数 No. PCR detection	符合数 No.coincidence	符合率% Coincidence rate/%	总检测数 No.total detection	符合数 No. coincidence	符合率% Coincidence rate/%
2017	96	92	95.8	15	12	80.0	96	94	97.9
2018	63	61	96.8	44	40	90.9	63	62	98.4
2019	66	63	95.5	57	51	89.5	66	62	93.9
合计Total	225	216	96.0	116	103	88.8	225	218	96.9

虫种 Plasmodium	检测数 No. detected	正确数 No. qualified	正确率/% Qualified rate/%
恶性疟原虫 P. falciparum	34	32	94.1
间日疟原虫P. vivax	13	13	100
三日疟原虫 P. malariae	12	12	100
卵形疟原虫P. ovale	8	8	100
阴性Negative	13	13	100
合计Total	80	78	97.5

[1]	GONG Yanfeng, LI Zifen, TANG Guai, HUANG Meiqin, ZHOU Binghua, HU Qiang. Epidemiological characteristics of malaria in Jiangxi Province from 2015 to 2022 [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF PARASITOLOGY AND PARASITIC DISEASES, 2023, 41(5): 586-592.
[2]	WEI Luanting, LI Runze, GUAN Liangchao, ZHANG Qianyu, LI Cheng, CAO Yaming, ZHAO Yan. Research progress of antimalarial drugs [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF PARASITOLOGY AND PARASITIC DISEASES, 2023, 41(4): 486-491.
[3]	ZHANG Le, XIA Jiawei, LI Xiang, MA Zhongxu, JIANG Jianjie, TANG Yalin, LIU Shu, ZHANG Kaiyi. Clinical analysis of imported COVID-19 cases complicated with severe falciparum malaria [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF PARASITOLOGY AND PARASITIC DISEASES, 2023, 41(4): 506-509.
[4]	CAO Wei, WANG Yi, ZHANG Xizhi, TONG Guodong, YANG Chao, SHEN Yan, ZHAO Ya. Research progress in adjunctive therapy of cerebral malaria [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF PARASITOLOGY AND PARASITIC DISEASES, 2023, 41(3): 361-373.
[5]	GENG Yan, LAN Ziyao, LI Yang, DAI Jiarui, CAI Shan, LU Lidan, HUANG Yuting, SHI Weifang, SHE Danya. Epidemiological analysis of malaria in Guizhou Province from 2017 to 2021 [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF PARASITOLOGY AND PARASITIC DISEASES, 2023, 41(3): 384-388.
[6]	ZHANG Li, YI Boyu, YIN Jianhai, XIA Zhigui. Epidemiological characteristics of malaria in China, 2022 [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF PARASITOLOGY AND PARASITIC DISEASES, 2023, 41(2): 137-141.
[7]	CHEN Zhuyun, OUYANG Rong, XIAO Lizhen, LIN Yaoying, XIE Hanguo, ZHANG Shanying. Current status of the primary surveillance and response system during the post malaria elimination phase in Fujian Province [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF PARASITOLOGY AND PARASITIC DISEASES, 2023, 41(2): 170-175.
[8]	SUN Jun. The biological significance of malarial hemozoin’s formation [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF PARASITOLOGY AND PARASITIC DISEASES, 2023, 41(2): 209-212.
[9]	CHEN Zhihui, HONG Jing, ZHANG Rongbing, YANG Qian, YE Qing, LI Jianrong, TIAN Rong. Epidemiological analysis on malaria cases reported in Kunming during 2006—2021 [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF PARASITOLOGY AND PARASITIC DISEASES, 2023, 41(2): 233-237.
[10]	LIU Jiancheng, XU Yan, WANG Longjiang, KONG Xiangli, WANG Yongbin, LI Yuejin. Surveillance on imported malaria in Linyi City of Shandong Province from 2015 to 2021 [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF PARASITOLOGY AND PARASITIC DISEASES, 2023, 41(2): 249-252.
[11]	ZHANG Yaoguang, JIANG Li, WANG Zhenyu, ZHU Min, ZHU Qian, MA Xiaojiang, YU Qing, Chen Jian. Analysis of the causes of misdiagnosis of seven imported malaria cases in Shanghai from 2020 to 2021 [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF PARASITOLOGY AND PARASITIC DISEASES, 2023, 41(1): 68-74.
[12]	LI Su-hua, JI Peng-hui, ZHOU Rui-min, HE Zhi-quan, QIAN Dan, YANG Cheng-yun, LIU Ying, LU De-ling, WANG Hao, ZHANG Hong-wei, ZHAO Yu-ling. Appraisal of diagnosis capacity of malaria reference laboratories in Henan Province during 2015—2019 [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF PARASITOLOGY AND PARASITIC DISEASES, 2022, 40(6): 748-753.
[13]	LI Mei, ZHOU He-jun, XIA Zhi-gui, ZHANG Li, TU Hong, YIN Jian-hai. Quality evaluation on the preparation of the malaria blood smears at the national level in 2019 [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF PARASITOLOGY AND PARASITIC DISEASES, 2022, 40(6): 754-759.
[14]	ZHAO Hui, XIANG Zheng, ZHOU Long-can, PAN Mao-hua, YANG Zhao-qing. Research progress of amodiaquine as an antimalarial drug [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF PARASITOLOGY AND PARASITIC DISEASES, 2022, 40(6): 786-791.
[15]	JI Peng-hui, JIANG Tian-tian, HE Zhi-quan, ZHOU Rui-min, LI Su-hua, YANG Cheng-yun, QIAN Dan, LIU Ying, WANG Hao, ZHANG Hong-wei. Analysis on epidemiological characteristics of imported quartan malaria in Henan Province from 2011 to 2021 [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF PARASITOLOGY AND PARASITIC DISEASES, 2022, 40(6): 801-805.