CHINESE JOURNAL OF PARASITOLOGY AND PARASITIC DISEASES ›› 2019, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (4): 464-471.doi: 10.12140/j.issn.1000-7423.2019.04.017

• REVIEWS • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Analysis of inconsistence of Plasmodium detection in some malaria cases

Mei LI(), Zhi-gui XIA, Shui-sen ZHOU*()   

  1. National Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Chinese Center for Diseases Control and Prevention;Chinese Center for Tropical Diseases Research;WHO Collaborating Centre for Tropical Diseases;National Center for International Research on Tropical Diseases, Ministry of Science and Technology;Key Laboratory of Parasite and Vector Biology, Ministry of Public Health, Shanghai 200025, China
  • Received:2019-01-02 Online:2019-08-30 Published:2019-09-05
  • Contact: Shui-sen ZHOU E-mail:limei@nipd.chinacdc.cn;zhouss@nipd.chinacdc.cn
  • Supported by:
    Supported by National Important Scientific & Technology Project(No. 2018ZX10101002-002)and National Health Commission Special project for Lancang-Mekong coorperation in 2017(No. 2020399)

Abstract:

Microscopic examination, PCR and rapid diagnostic test (RDT) are three major methods commonly used for detecting Plasmodium and diagnosing malaria. During the re-check and confirmation of diagnosis of malaria cases in national and provincial malaria diagnosis laboratories, it is common to observe the inconsistence in the results of three detection methods for the same blood sample, even reversing the final diagnosis at the end in some cases. For this reason, the literature related to the sensitivity and specificity of the three detection methods was collected and analyzed combining with our practical experience in order to provide reference for better understanding and encountering the inconsistence for those who meet the similar situation.

Key words: Microscopic examination, Polymerase chain reaction, Malaria rapid diagnostic test, Case confirmation, Sensitivity

CLC Number: