间日疟原虫和恶性疟原虫乳酸脱氢酶基因的序列和重组抗原表位分析

中国寄生虫学与寄生虫病杂志 ›› 2010, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (2): 5-107.

间日疟原虫和恶性疟原虫乳酸脱氢酶基因的序列和重组抗原表位分析

江莉，王真瑜，马晓疆，张小萍，蔡黎

上海市疾病预防控制中心，上海 200336

收稿日期:1900-01-01 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2010-04-30 发布日期:2010-04-30

Comparative Analysis of Nucleotide Sequences of Lactate Dehydrogenase （LDH） Gene and LDH Epitopes of Plasmodium vivax and Plasmodium falciparum

JIANG Li，WANG Zhen-yu，MA Xiao-jiang，ZHANG Xiao-ping，CAI Li

Shanghai Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention，Shanghai 200336，China

Received:1900-01-01 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2010-04-30 Published:2010-04-30

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的对间日疟原虫和恶性疟原虫乳酸脱氢酶（LDH）基因的序列及重组抗原的表位进行比较分析。方法根据GenBank中已知的pLDH基因序列（登录号为DQ198262和DQ060151）设计特异性引物，体外扩增间日疟原虫和恶性疟原虫LDH的全长基因，对两序列进行比对分析，用SYFPEITHI软件进行表位预测分析。将Pv-LDH和Pf-LDH基因克隆入pET28a表达载体，转化至大肠埃希菌BL21（DE3）株，加入异丙基-β-D硫代半乳糖苷（IPTG）诱导表达，Western blotting和中和ELISA法鉴定重组蛋白。结果 Pv-LDH和Pf-LDH基因的编码区全长均为951 bp，编码316个氨基酸，Pf-LDH与参考序列DQ198262完全一致，而Pv-LDH与参考序列DQ060151仅在第666位有一个核苷酸的变异；两者的核苷酸和氨基酸序列的一致性分别为75.1％和90.2％。T细胞表位预测分析结果显示，能识别pLDH抗原表位的人类白细胞抗原（HLA）分子类型共28种，预测的表位数约为180个，相同或相似的表位约占总表位数的75％，Pv-LDH和Pf-LDH特异性表位分别为38个和45个。Western blotting分析显示，Pv-LDH重组抗原可被疟疾患者血清识别，但反应强度明显低于Pv-LDH重组抗原免疫兔血清。中和ELISA试验结果显示，Pv-LDH抗原对多克隆抗体最高抑制率可达70.3％，而Pf?鄄LDH抗原的最高抑制率仅为30.5％。结论 Pv-LDH和Pf-LDH基因的核苷酸序列及其重组抗原均有差异，特异性表位诱导的抗体在整个抗体谱中相对较少。

关键词: 间日疟原虫, 恶性疟原虫, 乳酸脱氢酶, 抗原表位

Abstract: Objective To analyze the difference of nucleotide sequences of lactate dehydrogenase （LDH） gene and LDH epitopes of Plasmodium vivax and P. falciparum. Methods Specific primers were designed to amplify the full-length LDH gene sequence of P. vivax and P. falciparum（GenBank accession number： DQ198262 and DQ060151 respectively）. The PCR products were sequenced and compared. The epitopes of objective LDH antigens were predicted by SYFPEITHI software. Pv-LDH and Pf-LDH genes were cloned into prokaryotic plasmid pET28a, then expressed in E. coli BL21（DE3） with isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside （IPTG） induction. The immunogenicity of the recombinants Pv-LDH and Pf-LDH was analyzed by Western blotting and neutralization ELISA assays. Results Pf-LDH gene was same to reference sequences（DQ198262）, while there is a single nucleotide difference at the position 666 between Pv-LDH gene and reference sequences （DQ060151）. The coding region of the two genes contained 951 bp encoding a 316-amino-acid residue. Compared with Pf-LDH, Pv-LDH showed a nucleotide sequence identity of 75.1%, and an amino acid sequence identity of 90.2%. T cell epitope prediction indicated that there were 28 human leukocyte antigen （HLA） types which could recognize pLDH antigen epitopes. The common or similar epitopes accounted for about 75% of the predicted 180 epitopes. The number of specific epitopes of Pv-LDH and Pf-LDH proteins was 38 and 45, respectively. Western blotting analysis showed that the Pv-LDH recombinant antigen reacted with the sera of malaria patients, and the reactivity was much lower than that of sera of immunized rabbit. Neutralization ELISA showed that about 70.3% reactivity of Pv-LDH polyclonal antibodies could be suppressed by Pv-LDH, while only 30.5% by Pf-LDH. Conclusion There are differences in DNA sequences of LDH gene and LDH epitopes between P. vivax and P. falciparum. The antibodies induced by the specific epitopes account for a small proportion in the antibody repertoire.

Key words: Plasmodium vivax, Plasmodium falciparum, Lactate dehydrogenase, Antigen epitope

江莉;王真瑜;马晓疆;张小萍;蔡黎. 间日疟原虫和恶性疟原虫乳酸脱氢酶基因的序列和重组抗原表位分析[J]. 中国寄生虫学与寄生虫病杂志, 2010, 28(2): 5-107.

JIANGLi;WANGZhen-yu;MAXiao-jiang;ZHANGXiao-ping;CAILi. Comparative Analysis of Nucleotide Sequences of Lactate Dehydrogenase （LDH） Gene and LDH Epitopes of Plasmodium vivax and Plasmodium falciparum[J]. Chinese Journal of Parasitology and Parasitic Diseases, 2010, 28(2): 5-107.

[1]	周瑞敏, 纪鹏慧, 李素华, 杨成运, 刘颖, 钱丹, 邓艳, 鲁德领, 赵玉玲, 赵东阳, 张红卫. 河南省自赤道几内亚输入的恶性疟原虫抗药性基因多态性分析[J]. 中国寄生虫学与寄生虫病杂志, 2023, 41(5): 593-600.
[2]	丁红芸, 董莹, 徐艳春, 邓艳, 刘言, 吴静, 陈梦妮, 张苍林. 云南省输入性间日疟原虫多药抗性蛋白1基因突变多态性分析[J]. 中国寄生虫学与寄生虫病杂志, 2023, 41(4): 404-411.
[3]	徐少杰, 陈绅波, 陈军虎. 恶性疟原虫重复散布家族基因转录调控的研究进展[J]. 中国寄生虫学与寄生虫病杂志, 2023, 41(3): 374-379.
[4]	李润花, 殷国荣. 刚地弓形虫病多表位疫苗的研究进展[J]. 中国寄生虫学与寄生虫病杂志, 2022, 40(5): 661-667.
[5]	石天琪, 陈军虎. 间日疟原虫入侵网织红细胞相关蛋白的研究进展[J]. 中国寄生虫学与寄生虫病杂志, 2022, 40(3): 396-401.
[6]	田斌, 廖瑜, 文岚, 肖芳, 张兵, 申晓君. 长沙市122例输入性恶性疟原虫多药抗性基因1拷贝数变异分析[J]. 中国寄生虫学与寄生虫病杂志, 2022, 40(1): 127-131.
[7]	石明丽, 肖波, 江陆斌. 恶性疟原虫var基因的表达调控机制研究进展[J]. 中国寄生虫学与寄生虫病杂志, 2021, 39(6): 719-724.
[8]	李美, 涂宏, 夏志贵, 王真瑜, 周何军. 快速诊断靶蛋白恶性疟原虫富组氨酸蛋白Ⅱ和疟原虫乳酸脱氢酶的热稳定性[J]. 中国寄生虫学与寄生虫病杂志, 2021, 39(2): 245-248.
[9]	史善美, 陈军虎. 恶性疟原虫RIFIN蛋白的结构和功能研究进展[J]. 中国寄生虫学与寄生虫病杂志, 2021, 39(2): 249-255.
[10]	张苍林, 聂仁华, 徐丹, 吕高伟, 王剑, 杨亚明, 邓艳, 刘言, 周红宁. 中缅边境地区恶性疟原虫Pfcrt、Pfmdr和PfK13基因多态性与体外药物敏感性相关性的分析[J]. 中国寄生虫学与寄生虫病杂志, 2020, 38(5): 580-588.
[11]	叶升玉, 成依依, 李曼, 周红宁. 我国恶性疟原虫主要药物抗性研究[J]. 中国寄生虫学与寄生虫病杂志, 2020, 38(5): 631-636.
[12]	周水茂, 涂祖武, 杨燕, 陈芳, 贾西帅. 环介导等温扩增检测恶性疟原虫与其他疟原虫的效果评价[J]. 中国寄生虫学与寄生虫病杂志, 2020, 38(4): 423-428.
[13]	叶升玉, 成依依, 李曼, 周红宁. 恶性疟原虫抗药性分子标记检测方法研究进展[J]. 中国寄生虫学与寄生虫病杂志, 2020, 38(4): 490-495.
[14]	金行一, 张玲玲, 朱素娟, 徐卫民, 陈珺芳, 阮卫, 姚立农, 陈华良. 间日疟原虫裂殖子表面蛋白1和环子孢子蛋白基因多态性分析[J]. 中国寄生虫学与寄生虫病杂志, 2020, 38(3): 323-331.
[15]	徐艳春, 董莹, 邓艳, 毛祥华, 陈梦妮, 张苍林, 江陆斌. 云南省不同感染来源间日疟原虫环子孢子蛋白基因多态和种群结构分析[J]. 中国寄生虫学与寄生虫病杂志, 2020, 38(1): 67-73.