Evaluation of the molluscicidal effect and cost of three molluscicides combined with a herbicide

Abstract

Abstract:

Objective To observe the molluscicidal effect and the cost of molluscicides: 25% niclosamide ethanolamine salt (SCN), 26% suspension of metaldehyde and niclosamide ethanolamine salt（MNSC）, and 50% niclosamide ethanolamine salt (WPN) used in combination with glyphosate, in order to evaluate their application value. Methods The SCN, MNSC and the glyphosate were prepared into effective doses of 2 μl/L (for laboratory immersion test), 2 ml/m³ (for field immersion test) and 2 mL/m² (for spraying test), and the wettable powder of 50% WPN was prepared into effective doses of 2 mg/L (for laboratory immersion test), 2 g/m³ (for field immersion test) and 2 g/m² (for laboratory and field spraying test). There were 5 experimental groups in this study: SCN, SCN in combination with glyphosate (1 : 1), MNSC, MNSC in combination with glyphosate (1 : 1), and WPN in combination with glyphosate (1 : 1). WPN was used as a drug control. Glyphosate and water control groups were also set. In the laboratory immersion experiment, 30 snails were deposited in each group, and in the field immersion test, 9 bags of snails were deposited, each containing 30 snails. At 24 h, 48 h and 72 h after drug administration, 3 bags of snails were taken back to calculate the snail death rate. In the laboratory spraying test, 100 snails were deposited in each group and the snail death rate was calculated on days 1, 3 and 7 after drug administration. In the field spraying test, a 100 m² area of snail-containing ditch was administered with drugs, and on days 1, 3 and 7 after drug administration 10 boxes of snails were selected to calculate the snail death rate. The cost-benefit was analyzed based on the cost of molluscicides, labor cost, and herbicide labor cost. Results In the laboratory immersion experiment, the snail death rate reached 100% in all the experimental groups at 24 h, 48 h and 72 h, except for the SCN in combination with glyphosate group at 24 h, in which the death rate was 96.7% (29/30). There was no significant difference between experimental groups and the drug control group. In the laboratory spraying test, the snail death rate reached 100% in all the experimental groups on days 3 and 7, except for the SCN in combination with glyphosate group on day 1 (91.0%, 91/100) and on days 3 and 7(≥95%) at 24 h. There was no significant difference between experimental groups and the drug control group. In the laboratory immersion experiment, the snail death rate reached 100% in all the experimental groups and the drug control group at 24 h, 48 h and 72 h, except for the SCN in combination with glyphosate group (>95%). There was no significant difference between the groups (P > 0.05). In the field spraying test, the snail death rate reached 100% in MNSC in combination with glyphosate group on days 1, 3 and 7, higher than those in the drug control group (91.8%, 258/281; 95.4%, 206/216; 94.5%, 147/155) (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the other 4 experimental groups and the drug control group (P > 0.05). The costs of SCN, MNSC and WPN without glyphosate per 100 m² were 101.00 Yuan, 101.80 Yuan and 103.90 Yuan due to the need of more labor input, while the costs of SCN compounding form, MNSC compounding form and WPN compounding form per 100 m² were 69.50 Yuan, 70.30 Yuan and 72.40 Yuan, all less than the former.Conclusion On consideration of molluscicidal effect and the application cost, 2 g/m² or 2 ml/m² compound drugs of the three types of molluscicides are recommended in field snail control by the method of spraying.

Key words: Molluscicide, Compound drug, Molluscicidal effect, Cost-benefit

CLC Number:

R382.241

Deng CHEN, Kuang-ji ZHU, Jian-feng ZHANG, Xiao-lan YAN, Hong-xin WANG, Hai-juan DU, Feng-yao SHAO, Xiao ZHANG, Qing-xiang HUANG, Lan-jin ZHANG, Li-yong WEN. Evaluation of the molluscicidal effect and cost of three molluscicides combined with a herbicide[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF PARASITOLOGY AND PARASITIC DISEASES, 2018, 36(5): 443-449.

Figures/Tables 5

Table 1

Table 2

Table 3

Table 4

Table 5

References 17

[1]	雷正龙, 周晓农. 血吸虫病“十二五”防治规划实施进展及面临的挑战[J]. 中国寄生虫学与寄生虫病杂志, 2014, 32(2): 81-85.
[2]	许静, 张险峰, 高婧, 等. 湖北省省部联防行动防治血吸虫病成效分析[J]. 中国寄生虫学与寄生虫病杂志, 2014, 32(3): 180-185.
[3]	周晓农, 姜庆五, 孙乐平, 等. 我国血吸虫病防治与监测[J]. 中国血吸虫病防治杂志, 2005, 17(3): 161-165.
[4]	闻礼永. 血吸虫病监测手册[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2014.
[5]	徐世芳, 王晗, 姜丽霞. 氯硝柳胺不同剂型及其灭螺的研究进展[J]. 中国血吸虫病防治杂志, 2005, 17(6): 478-480.
[6]	黄轶昕, 洪青标, 孙乐平, 等. 氯硝柳胺乙醇胺盐粉剂杀灭钉螺效果的研究[J]. 中国血吸虫病防治杂志, 2003, 15(4): 255-258.
[7]	任晓联, 胡宗健, 王晓红, 等. 山丘地区“农达”除草后药物灭螺效果的观察[J]. 热带病与寄生虫学, 2005, 3(2): 86-88.
[8]	中华人民共和国农业部.农药登记用杀灭钉螺药剂试验方法和评价(NY/T 1617-2008)[S]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2008: 1-3.
[9]	中华人民共和国卫生部疾病控制司. 血吸虫病防治手册[M]. 3版. 上海: 上海科学技术出版社, 2002: 201-206.
[10]	鲍子平, 曹淳力, 戴建荣, 等. 26%四聚·杀螺胺悬浮剂杀螺效果的评价[J]. 中国血吸虫病防治杂志, 2011, 23(1): 48-53.
[11]	戴建荣, 徐年凤, 梁幼生, 等. 氯硝柳胺悬浮剂的研制及其杀螺效果评价[J]. 中国血吸虫病防治杂志, 2003, 15(1): 3-6.
[12]	李炳桂, 李文豹, 冯锡光, 等. 四聚·杀螺胺悬浮剂云南山区现场灭螺效果[J]. 中国血吸虫病防治杂志, 2012, 24(5): 564-566.
[13]	戴建荣, 朱荫昌, 黄铭西. 灭螺药物的研究进展[J]. 中国血吸虫病防治杂志, 2000, 12(3): 189-192.
[14]	吴昌寿, 刘官陵, 刘心胜. 四聚乙醛及杀虫丁杀螺简介[J]. 热带病与寄生虫学, 1996, 25(3): 165-165.
[15]	何家昶, 汪昊, 吴明耀, 等. 4%氯硝柳胺乙醇胺盐粉剂杀灭钉螺现场应用的效果观察[J]. 热带病与寄生虫学, 2007, 5(3): 153-154.
[16]	徐校平, 祝太平, 王卫强, 等. 氯硝柳胺联合草甘膦现场灭螺效果的对比实验观察[J]. 中国病原生物学杂志, 2008, 3(4): 299-302.
[17]	杜海娟, 张剑锋, 严晓岚, 等. 浙江省2016年血吸虫病疫情监测分析[J]. 国际流行病学传染病学杂志, 2017(5): 329-323.

组别Group	浓度/g·m^-2或ml·m^-2 Dosage/g·m^-2 or ml·m^-2	1 d钉螺死亡率/%Snail death rate after 1 day /%	P	3 d钉螺死亡率/%Snail death rate after 3 days/%	P	7 d钉螺死亡率/%Snail death rate after 7 days /%	P
SCN	2	95.0	0.06^a	100	-	100	-
SCN复配草甘膦 SCN with glyphosate	2	91.0	0.00^a	95.0	0.06^a	96.0	0.12^a
MNSC	2	99.0	1.00^a	100	-	100	-
MNSC复配草甘膦 MNSC with glyphosate	2	100	-	100	-	100	-
WPN复配草甘膦 WPN with glyphosate	2	98.0	0.50^a	100	-	100	-
WPN	2	100		100		100
草甘膦Glyphosate	2	20.0		18.0		17.0
清水Water		2.0		4.0		4.0

组别Group	浓度/g·m^-2或ml·m^-2 Dosage/g·m^-2 or ml·m^-2	1 d钉螺死亡率/% Snail death rate after 1 day /%	χ²	P	3 d钉螺死亡率/% Snail death rate after 3 days /%	χ²	P	7 d钉螺死亡率/% Snail death rate after 7 days /%	χ²	P
SCN	2	95.0（205/221）	0.15	0.70	93.6（145/155）	0.59	0.44	94.1（143/152）	0.09	0.77
SCN复配草甘膦 SCN with glyphosate	2	90.2（166/184）	0.35	0.55	93.4（127/136）	0.65	0.42	97.1（199/205）	1.18	0.28
MNSC	2	90.4（178/197）	0.30	0.57	92.3（116/125）	0.99	0.32	94.0（155/165）	0.12	0.73
MNSC复配草甘膦 MNSC with glyphosate	2	100（212/212）	18.20	0.00	100（191/191）		0.002^a	100（183/183）		0.002^a
WPN复配草甘膦 WPN with glyphosate	2	89.4（135/151）	0.70	0.40	95.0（151/159）	0.32	0.86	95.1（232/244）	0.12	0.91
WPN	2	91.8（258/281）			95.4（206/216）			94.8（147/155）
草甘膦Glyphosate	2	7.5（11/147）			13.8（22/159）			8.2（20/245）
清水Water		4.4（7/161）			4.4（8/181）			3.3（5/150）

药物Drug	用药成本/元·（100 m²）^-1 Drug cost/Yuan per 100 m²	灭螺人工费/元·（100 m²）^-1 Labor cost of snail-killing/ Yuan per 100 m²	除草人工费/元·（100 m²）^-1 Labor cost of weeding/ Yuan per 100 m²	合计/元·（100 m²）^-1 Total/ Yuan per 100 m²
SCN	6.00	57.50	37.50	101.00
SCN复配草甘膦 SCN with glyphosate	12.00	57.50	-	69.50
MNSC	6.80	57.50	37.50	101.80
MNSC复配草甘膦 MNSC with glyphosate	12.80	57.50	-	70.30
WPN	8.90	57.50	37.50	103.90
WPN复配草甘膦 WPN with glyphosate	14.90	57.50	-	72.40