中国寄生虫学与寄生虫病杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (4): 500-504.doi: 10.12140/j.issn.1000-7423.2026.04.006

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

广州管圆线虫在大鼠体内动态分布与DNA载量研究

李天美*()(), 姜英睿, 方文, 李婷, 赵申华, 任建辉   

  1. 大理白族自治州血吸虫病防治研究所, 云南大理 671000
  • 收稿日期:2026-02-03 修回日期:2026-03-21 出版日期:2026-08-30 发布日期:2026-08-18
  • 作者简介:李天美(ORCID: 0000-0003-3718-0378),女,本科,副主任医师,从事寄生虫病预防控制与研究。E-mail: litianmeisky@163.com
    作者贡献

    李天美负责实验设计与指导、论文撰写与修改,姜英睿负责实验实施、数据收集与分析,方文、李婷、赵申华参与样品采集,任建辉参与论文修改。

  • 基金资助:
    国家卫生健康委员会寄生虫病原与媒介生物学重点实验室开放研究课题(NHCKFKT2021-12);云南省高层次卫生健康技术人才(H-2018073)

Dynamic distribution and DNA load of Angiostrongylus cantonensis in rats

LI Tianmei*()(), JIANG Yingrui, FANG Wen, LI Ting, ZHAO Shenhua, REN Jianhui   

  1. Dali Autonomous Prefecture Institute of Schistosomiasis Control and Prevention, Dali 671000, Yunnan, China
  • Received:2026-02-03 Revised:2026-03-21 Online:2026-08-30 Published:2026-08-18
  • Contact: * E-mail: litianmeisky@163.com
  • Supported by:
    Key Laboratory of Parasitic Pathogens and Vector Biology of the National Health Commission(NHCKFKT2021-12);Yunnan Provincial High-level Health Technical Talent(H-2018073)

摘要:

目的 分析广州管圆线虫在大鼠体内的动态分布与DNA载量变化规律,为临床诊断与防控提供实验依据。 方法 将55只雄性SD大鼠随机分为对照组(10只)和感染组(45只)。感染组分为低剂量组(20条/鼠)、中剂量组(60条/鼠)和高剂量组(100条/鼠),每组15只,经口灌胃相应数量的广州管圆线虫Ⅲ期幼虫;对照组灌胃等量无菌生理盐水。于感染后第3、7、14、28、35天采集脑脊液、全血、血清、脑组织、心脏及肺组织,其中脑组织、心脏及肺组织置解剖镜下检查并去除肉眼可见虫体;所有有效样品分别采用常规PCR扩增内转录间隔区2(ITS2)序列,TaqMan探针法实时荧光定量PCR(qPCR)扩增ITS1序列,常规PCR阳性产物经双向测序后进行BLAST比对。以梯度稀释的广州管圆线虫标准质粒(阳性标准品)进行常规PCR和qPCR检测,确定检测限;以旋毛虫、猪囊尾蚴、美洲钩虫及大鼠基因组DNA为模板验证特异度;以1.67 × 107~1.67 × 102拷贝/μL的标准质粒评估重复性及检测限。采用SPSS 26.0统计学软件进行数据分析。 结果 感染组45只大鼠经解剖镜检均查见虫体,感染成功率为100%(45/45);共采集样品270份,有效样品245份,常规PCR检出率为0(0/245);qPCR检出率为67.35%(165/245)。qPCR检测体系灵敏度为10拷贝/μL,与旋毛虫、猪囊尾蚴、美洲钩虫及大鼠基因组DNA均无交叉反应。低、中、高剂量组检出率随感染时间延长呈上升趋势(χ2 = 11.82、13.57、14.84,均P < 0.01),第3天分别为7/18、5/18和11/18;第7天分别为8/18、11/18和11/18;第14天分别为6/13、7/11和13/15;第28天分别为11/17、12/15和15/15;第35天分别为15/16、16/18和17/17。阴性对照组各时间点样品均未检出广州管圆线虫DNA。各组织及体液样品的qPCR阳性检出率由高到低依次为:脑组织88.37%(38/43)、心脏74.42%(32/43)、肺组织72.09%(31/43)、脑脊液65.79%(25/38)、血清52.94%(18/34)和全血47.73%(21/44)。三因素方差分析结果显示,感染组织(F = 22.110,P < 0.01)、感染剂量(F = 3.762,P < 0.05)和感染时间(F = 34.768,P < 0.01)均可影响DNA载量,且感染组织与感染时间存在交互效应(F = 4.295,P < 0.01)。感染早期(3~7 d)DNA信号集中于脑组织;第14天起肺组织和心脏载量快速上升;第28~35天脑组织、肺组织、心脏均处于高载量水平,其中第35天肺组织载量超过脑组织。 结论 广州管圆线虫残留DNA在大鼠体内以脑、肺组织分布为主,且随感染进程动态演变,感染后第14~35天为残留DNA载量的高峰期。

关键词: 广州管圆线虫, 实时荧光定量PCR, DNA载量, 组织分布

Abstract:

Objective To investigate the dynamic distribution and changes in DNA load of Angiostrongylus cantonensis in rats, so as to provide experimental evidence for clinical diagnosis and disease control. Methods Fifty-five SD rats were randomly assigned to a control group (n = 10) and an infection group (n = 45). The infection group was subdivided into a low-dose group (20 larvae/rat), a medium-dose group (60 larvae/rat), and a high-dose group (100 larvae/rat), with 15 rats per subgroup. Rats in the infection groups were infected with third-stage larvae of A. cantonensis by oral gavage; the control group received an equal volume of sterile physiological saline by gavage. Cerebrospinal fluid, whole blood, serum, brain tissue, heart, and lung tissue were collected on days 3, 7, 14, 28, and 35 post-infection. Brain, heart, and lung tissues were examined under a dissecting microscope and visible worms were removed. All valid samples were tested for the ITS2 sequence with conventional PCR assay and ITS1 sequence with TaqMan probe-based qPCR assay, and positive PCR amplification products were subjected to bidirectional sequencing, followed by sequence alignment using the BLAST program. The limit of detection was determined by both conventional PCR and qPCR using serially diluted standard plasmids of A. cantonensis (positive standard), and the specificity was assessed using genomic DNA from Trichinella spiralis, Cysticercus cellulosae, Necator americanus, and rats as templates, while repeatability was evaluated across a range of 1.67 × 107 to 1.67 × 102 copies/μL. All statistical analyses were performed using the software SPSS 26.0. Results Visible parasites were detected in 45 rats from the infection groups by dissection microscopy, with a 100% (45/45) percentage of successful infections. A total of 270 samples were collected, including 245 valid samples. Conventional PCR assay yielded no specific bands, with a detection rate of 0 (0/245), while the detection rate of qPCR assay was 67.35% (165/245). The sensitivity of the qPCR assay was 10 copies/μL, and no cross-reactivity was observed with genomic DNA from T. spiralis, C. cellulosae, N. americanus, or rats. The detection rates showed a tendency towards a rise in the low-, medium-, and high-dose infection groups over time (χ2 = 11.82, 13.57, 14.84, all P < 0.01), with 7/18, 5/18, and 11/18 on day 3 post-infection, 8/18, 11/18, and 11/18 on day 7 post-infection, 6/13, 7/11, and 13/15 on day 14 post-infection, 11/17, 12/15, and 15/15 on day 28 post-infection and 15/16, 16/18, and 17/17 on day 35 post-infection, while no A. cantonensis DNA was detected in samples from the negative control group at any time point. The highest detection rate of A. cantonensis was seen in brain tissues (88.37%, 38/43) using qPCR assay, followed by in heart (74.42%, 32/43), lung tissue (72.09%, 31/43), cerebrospinal fluid (65.79%, 25/38), serum (52.94%, 18/34), and whole blood (47.73%, 21/44). Three-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed that tissue type (F = 22.110, P < 0.01), dose of infection (F = 3.762, P < 0.05), and time of infection (F = 34.768, P < 0.01) significantly affected DNA load, with a significant interaction between tissue and time (F = 4.295, P < 0.01). DNA signals were predominantly concentrated in brain tissues at early stage of infection (3 to 7 days post-infection), and the DNA load increased rapidly in lung and heart since day 14 post-infection. High levels of DNA load were seen in brain, lung, and heart on days 28 to 35 post-infection, and the DNA load was higher in lung tissues than in brain tissues on day 35 post-infection. Conclusion Residual DNA of A. cantonensis is predominantly distributed in brain and lung tissues of rats and evolves dynamically over the course of infection, with the period from 14 to 35 days post-infection representing the peak of residual DNA load.

Key words: Angiostrongylus cantonensis, Real-time fluorescent quantitative PCR, DNA load, Tissue distribution

中图分类号: