ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Impact of Toxoplasma gondii infection on mucosal immunopathology in mouse small intestines

  • ZHANG Ling ,
  • LIN Xincheng ,
  • LV Fangli
Expand
  • 1 Scientific Research Center, the Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen 518107, Guangdong, China
    2 Department of Parasitology, School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen 518107, Guangdong, China
    3 Department of Parasitology, Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong, China

Received date: 2025-11-10

  Revised date: 2026-01-19

  Online published: 2026-04-13

Supported by

National Natural Science Foundation of China(82272366);National Natural Science Foundation of China(81971955);Basic Research Fund in Shenzhen Natural Science Foundation(JCYJ20220530145002006);Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province(2021A1515012115);Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province(2019A1515011667)

Abstract

Objective To examine the effect of acute Toxoplasma gondii infection on mucosal immune responses and immunopathology in mouse small intestines and unravel the mechanism. Methods Fifteen Kunming mice were randomly divided into two groups, including the T. gondii infection group (10 mice) and the control group (5 mice). Mice in the infection group were intraperitoneally injected with tachyzoites of the T. gondii RH strain (1 × 103 tachyzoites per mouse), while animals in the control group were injected with an equal volume of PBS. Mice were sacrificed at 7 days post-infection, and the posterior section of small intestine (2 cm in length) and mesenteric lymph nodes were taken for paraffin embedding, preparing slices, and hematoxylin and eosin staining to observe the pathological changes of mice. The intestinal villi length and the crypt depth were measured, and the numbers of goblet cells and Paneth cells were counted. In addition, immunohistochemical staining was performed to count the number of CD68+ cells in small intestines. Differences of means were tested for statistical significance using independent sample t test with the software GraphPad Prism 10.1.2. Results The structures of mouse small intestinal villi and mesenteric lymph nodes were intact with a normal morphology in the control group, while mice in the infection group exhibited severe pathological damage in the small intestine, characterized by necrosis of villous epithelial cells, shedding or shortening of intestinal villi, deepening of intestinal crypts, and extensive infiltration of inflammatory cells in small intestinal mucosal tissues. Additionally, the histological structures of the mesenteric lymph nodes of mice in the infection group were disrupted, with diffuse necrotic lesions observed. T. gondii tachyzoites and pseudocysts were observed in mouse small intestines and mesenteric lymph nodes in the infection group. The mean length of mouse small intestinal villi was shorter in the infection group than that in the control group [(93.07 ± 2.158) μm vs. (125.0 ± 19.36) μm; t = 2.756, P < 0.05], and the mean depth of mouse small intestinal crypts was greater in the infection group than that in the control group [(49.04 ± 8.809) μm vs. (39.9 ± 4.174) μm; t = 2.382, P < 0.05]. The number of goblet cells per 10 mouse small intestinal villi was lower in the control group than that in the infection group [(78.70 ± 14.01) cells vs. (96.71 ± 13.89) cells; t = 2.618, P < 0.05], and the number of goblet cells per 10 mouse small intestinal crypts was fewer in the infection group than that in the control group [(31.60 ± 8.60) cells vs. (53.17 ± 13.03) cells; t = 4.014, P < 0.05]. The number of Paneth cells per 20 mouse small intestinal crypts was fewer in the infection group than that in the control group [(69.80 ± 8.90) cells vs. (103.0 ± 4.86) cells; t = 8.342, P < 0.01]. In addition, the number of CD68+ macrophages per high-power field in mouse small intestine tissue was larger in the infection group than that in the control group [(42.33 ± 11.41) cells vs. (15.75 ± 2.754) cells; t = 4.496, P < 0.01], and the number of CD68+ macrophages in mouse Peyer’s patches per high-power field was higher in the infection group than that in the control group [(185.0 ± 23.80) cells vs. (15.75 ± 2.754) cells; t = 9.286, P < 0.01]. Conclusion Acute T. gondii infection may induce small intestinal damage in mice, with a decrease in goblet cell and Paneth cell counts and an increase in CD68+ macrophage number in small intestinal tissues, suggesting that goblet cells, Paneth cells, and macrophages may contribute to mucosal immune responses and immunopathology of small intestines.

Cite this article

ZHANG Ling , LIN Xincheng , LV Fangli . Impact of Toxoplasma gondii infection on mucosal immunopathology in mouse small intestines[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF PARASITOLOGY AND PARASITIC DISEASES, 2026 , 44(2) : 209 -213 . DOI: 10.12140/j.issn.1000-7423.2026.02.009

References

[1] Fernández-Escobar M, Schares G, Maksimov P, et al. Toxoplasma gondii genotyping: a closer look into Europe[J]. Front Cell Infect Microbiol, 2022, 12: 842595.
[2] Montoya JG, Liesenfeld O. Toxoplasmosis[J]. Lancet, 2004, 363(9425): 1965-1976.
[3] Snyder LM, Denkers EY. From initiators to effectors: roadmap through the intestine during encounter of Toxoplasma gondii with the mucosal immune system[J]. Front Cell Infect Microbiol, 2020, 10: 614701.
[4] Schreiner M, Liesenfeld O. Small intestinal inflammation following oral infection with Toxoplasma gondii does not occur exclusively in C57BL/6 mice: review of 70 reports from the literature[J]. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz, 2009, 104(2): 221-233.
[5] Liesenfeld O. Immune responses to Toxoplasma gondii in the gut[J]. Immunobiology, 1999, 201(2): 229-239.
[6] Grainger JR, Wohlfert EA, Fuss IJ, et al. Inflammatory monocytes regulate pathologic responses to commensals during acute gastrointestinal infection[J]. Nat Med, 2013, 19(6): 713-721.
[7] Coombes JL, Charsar BA, Han SJ, et al. Motile invaded neutrophils in the small intestine of Toxoplasma gondii-infected mice reveal a potential mechanism for parasite spread[J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2013, 110(21): E1913-E1922.
[8] Glover M, Tang ZW, Sealock R, et al. Diarrhea as a presenting symptom of disseminated toxoplasmosis[J]. Case Rep Gastrointest Med, 2017, 2017: 3491087.
[9] Egan CE, Cohen SB, Denkers EY. Insights into inflammatory bowel disease using Toxoplasma gondii as an infectious trigger[J]. Immunol Cell Biol, 2012, 90(7): 668-675.
[10] Antfolk M, Jensen KB. A bioengineering perspective on modelling the intestinal epithelial physiology in vitro[J]. Nat Commun, 2020, 11(1): 6244.
[11] Suzuki Y, Yang Q, Remington JS. Genetic resistance against acute toxoplasmosis depends on the strain of Toxoplasma gondii[J]. J Parasitol, 1995, 81(6): 1032-1034.
[12] Casagrande L, Pastre MJ, Trevizan AR, et al. Moderate intestinal immunopathology after acute oral infection with Toxoplasma gondii oocysts is associated with expressive levels of serotonin[J]. Life Sci, 2022, 309: 120985.
[13] Sumyuen MH, Garin YJ, Derouin F. Early kinetics of Toxoplasma gondii infection in mice infected orally with cysts of an avirulent strain[J]. J Parasitol, 1995, 81(2): 327-329.
[14] 欧阳然, 刘星卓, 黄世光, 等. 阻断半乳糖凝集素-受体相互作用对弓形虫感染小鼠小肠免疫病理的影响[J]. 中国寄生虫学与寄生虫病杂志, 2023, 41(3): 279-285.
  Ouyang R, Liu XZ, Huang SG, et al. Effect of locking galectin-receptor interaction on the immunopathology of small intestine of Toxoplasma gondii-infected mice[J]. Chin J Parasitol Parasit Dis, 2023, 41(3): 279-285. (in Chinese)
[15] 祝子伏, 董辉, 苏瑞景, 等. Chinese 1型弓形虫在终宿主家猫肠内发育的研究[J]. 中国人兽共患病学报, 2018, 34(10): 883-887.
  Zhu ZF, Dong H, Su RJ, et al. Research of the development of Chinese 1 strain Toxoplasma gondii in intestinal epithelial cells of cat[J]. Chin J Zoonoses, 2018, 34(10): 883-887. (in Chinese)
[16] Shang HT, Wei H, Yue BF, et al. Microsatellite analysis in two populations of Kunming mice[J]. Lab Anim, 2009, 43(1): 34-40.
[17] Mansouri P, Mansouri P, Behmard E, et al. Novel targets for mucosal healing in inflammatory bowel disease therapy[J]. Int Immunopharmacol, 2025, 144: 113544.
[18] Sousa RAP, Nunes de Paula JH, Silva RJ, et al. Salivary shield: rhodnius prolixus salivary glandular extract reduces intestinal immunopathology and protects against Toxoplasma gondii infection[J]. Gut Pathog, 2025, 17(1): 13.
[19] Araujo ECB, Brice?o MPP, Cariaco Y, et al. Toxoplasma gondii infection decreases intestinal 5-lipoxygenase expression, while exogenous LTB4 controls parasite growth[J]. Infect Immun, 2022, 90(7): e0002922.
[20] Raetz M, Hwang SH, Wilhelm CL, et al. Parasite-induced TH1 cells and intestinal dysbiosis cooperate in IFN-γ-dependent elimination of Paneth cells[J]. Nat Immunol, 2013, 14(2): 136-142.
[21] Bevins CL, Salzman NH. Paneth cells, antimicrobial peptides and maintenance of intestinal homeostasis[J]. Nat Rev Microbiol, 2011, 9(5): 356-368.
[22] Ma S, Zhu KC, Liu Y, et al. Research progress on the relationship between the intestinal barrier and macrophages[J]. Curr Issues Mol Biol, 2025, 47(10): 813.
[23] Phillips CL, Welch BA, Garrett MR, et al. Regional heterogeneity in rat Peyer’s patches through whole transcriptome analysis[J]. Exp Biol Med (Maywood), 2021, 246(5): 513-522.
[24] Liesenfeld O, Kang H, Park D, et al. TNF-alpha, nitric oxide and IFN-gamma are all critical for development of necrosis in the small intestine and early mortality in genetically susceptible mice infected perorally with Toxoplasma gondii[J]. Parasite Immunol, 1999, 21(7): 365-376.
[25] Dunay IR, Damatta RA, Fux B, et al. Gr1+ (Ly6C+) Inflammatory monocytes are required for mucosal resistance to the pathogen Toxoplasma gondii[J]. Immunity, 2008, 29(2): 306-317.
Outlines

/

〈 〉