CHINESE JOURNAL OF PARASITOLOGY AND PARASITIC DISEASES >
MicroRNA differential expression profiles and their diagnostic value in the sheep infected with Echinococcus granulosus
Received date: 2024-02-01
Revised date: 2024-04-30
Online published: 2024-07-16
Supported by
National Natural Science Foundation of China(32260874);State Key Laboratory of Sheep Genetic Improvement and Healthy Production(MYSKLKF202003)
Objective To screen the miRNAs differential expression profiles in the serum from the sheep infected with Echinococcus granulosus and evaluate their potential values in the diagnosis of echinococcosis. Methods 10 sheep were divided into an infection group (5) and a control group (5). The E. granulosus infected-group was given 2 000 eggs per sheep by gavage, and the control group of sheep was given saline. Sixty days after infection, peripheral blood was collected from both groups, and total serum RNA was extracted. Small RNA high-throughput sequencing was used to identify and screen differentially expressed miRNAs. Five differentially expressed miRNAs were validated by real-time quantitative PCR (qRT-PCR). MedCale software was used to draw receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calculate the area under the curve (AUC), and select miRNAs with potential diagnostic values (AUC ≥ 0.7). qRT-PCR was used to detect the relative transcription levels of miRNAs with potential diagnostic values in 15 serum samples of sheep infected with E. granulosus, and the AUC, sensitivity, and specificity were calculated.Target genes of the differentially expressed miRNAs were predicted using miRanda and RNA hybrid software, and gene ontology (GO) enrichment analysis and Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analysis were conducted. Results Sequencing results identified a total of 26 differentially expressed miRNAs, including 21 upregulated and 5 downregulated. The qRT-PCR results showed that the relative expression levels of five relatively abundant differentially expressed miRNAs in infection group, including oar-miR-191, oar-let-7a, oar-miR-150, oar-miR-26a, and oar-miR-21, were 2.22 ± 0.31, 2.12 ± 0.24, 2.42 ± 0.35, 2.09 ± 0.15, and 3.23 ± 0.83, respectively, which were higher than the control group (1.00 ± 0.11). There was a statistically significant difference in the relative expression levels of oar-miR-191, oar-let-7a, oar-miR-150, and oar-miR-26a compared to the control group (t = 3.960, 4.766, 4.096, 9.126; all P < 0.05). ROC curve analysis revealed that the AUC of oar-let-7a, oar-miR-26a, and oar-miR-21 were all less than 0.7. the AUC of oar-miR-191 was 0.858, with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI) of 0.719-0.997 (P < 0.05), indicating its high diagnostic value, with a sensitivity of 71.43% and specificity of 85.71%. The AUC of oar-miR-150 was 0.738, with a 95% CI of 0.550-0.926 (P < 0.05), indicating its diagnostic significance, with a sensitivity of 53.33% and specificity of 86.67%. The results of the GO significance enrichment analysis showed that miRNA target genes with transcriptional levels increased by more than twice were mainly related to stress response, cell surface molecules, protein binding, and other functions. The KEGG pathway enrichment analysis results indicate that miRNA target genes with at least a two-fold increase in transcription levels are mainly enriched in key signalling pathways such as inflammation response, autophagy, and apoptosis. Conclusion The oar-miR-191 and oar-miR-150 screened in this study have good sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of E. granulosus infection, suggesting their potential as a biomarker for the diagnosis of echinococcosis.
Key words: Echinococcus granulosus; MicroRNA; Serum; High-throughput sequencing; ROC curve
WU Yixuan , GUO Xiaola , CHEN Yixia . MicroRNA differential expression profiles and their diagnostic value in the sheep infected with Echinococcus granulosus[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF PARASITOLOGY AND PARASITIC DISEASES, 2024 , 42(3) : 295 -302 . DOI: 10.12140/j.issn.1000-7423.2024.03.003
| [1] | Wen H, Tuerganaili AJ, Shao YM, et al. Research achievements and challenges for echinococcosis control[J]. Chin J Parasitol Parasit Dis, 2015, 33(6): 466-471. (in Chinese) |
| (温浩, (吐尔干艾力?阿吉, 邵英梅, 等. 棘球蚴病防治成就及面临的挑战[J]. 中国寄生虫学与寄生虫病杂志, 2015, 33(6): 466-471.) | |
| [2] | Casulli A, Siles-Lucas M, Tamarozzi F. Echinococcus granulosus sensu lato[J]. Trends Parasitol, 2019, 35(8): 663-664. |
| [3] | Wang LY, Qin M, Liu ZH, et al. Prevalence and spatial distribution characteristics of human echinococcosis in China[J]. PLoS Negl Trop Dis, 2021, 15(12): e0009996. |
| [4] | Zhang MY, Wu WP, Guan YY, et al. Analysis on disease burden of hydatid disease in China[J]. Chin J Parasitol Parasit Dis, 2018, 36(1): 15-19, 25. (in Chinese) |
| (张梦媛, 伍卫平, 官亚宜, 等. 我国棘球蚴病疾病负担分析[J]. 中国寄生虫学与寄生虫病杂志, 2018, 36(1): 15-19, 25.) | |
| [5] | Yuzhu ZM. Harm and control of sheep hydatid disease[J]. Chin J Tradit Vet Sci, 2022(8): 63-65. (in Chinese) |
| (玉珠卓玛. 羊棘球蚴病的危害和防控[J]. 中兽医学杂志, 2022(8): 63-65.) | |
| [6] | Acu?a SM, Floeter-Winter LM, Muxel SM. MicroRNAs: biological regulators inpathogen-host interactions[J]. Cells, 2020, 9(1): 113. |
| [7] | Yan C, Zhou QY, Wu J, et al. Csi-let-7a-5p delivered by extracellular vesicles from a liver fluke activates M1-like macrophages and exacerbates biliary injuries[J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2021, 118(46): e2102206118. |
| [8] | Zhou X, Hou QL, Li B, et al. Effects of Echinococcus granulosus microcysts on the activation of peritoneal macrophages and the level of inflammatory factors in mice[J]. J Pathog Biol, 2021, 16(4): 411-418. (in Chinese) |
| (周璇, 侯秋莲, 李斌, 等. 细粒棘球蚴微囊对小鼠腹腔巨噬细胞活化及炎症因子水平的影响[J]. 中国病原生物学杂志, 2021, 16(4): 411-418.) | |
| [9] | Ren MD, Ning YY, Li M, et al. Differential expression of circulating microRNAs in patients with cystic echinococcosis and screening for specific diagnostic biomarkers for the disease[J]. Chin J Parasitol Parasit Dis, 2017, 35(5): 423-428. (in Chinese) |
| (任梦迪, 宁玉烨, 黎明, 等. 细粒棘球蚴病患者外周血微小RNA的差异表达分析及其特异性诊断标志物的筛选[J]. 中国寄生虫学与寄生虫病杂志, 2017, 35(5): 423-428.) | |
| [10] | Habibi B, Gholami S, Bagheri A, et al. Cystic echinococcosis microRNAs as potential noninvasive biomarkers: current insights and upcoming perspective[J]. Expert Rev Mol Diagn, 2023, 23(10): 885-894. |
| [11] | Mahami-Oskouei M, Norouzi B, Ahmadpour E, et al. Expression analysis of circulating miR-146a and miR-155 as novel biomarkers related to effective immune responses in human cystic echinococcosis[J]. Microb Pathog, 2021, 157: 104962. |
| [12] | Karami MF, Beiromvand M, Rafiei A, et al. Serum level of egr-miR-2a-3p as a potential diagnostic biomarker for cystic echinococcosis[J]. Acta Parasitol, 2023, 68(1): 114-121. |
| [13] | Cao DP, Jiang BF, Zhang YG, et al. MicroRNA-125b-5p is a promising novel plasma biomarker for alveolar echinococcosis in patients from the southern province of Qinghai[J]. BMC Infect Dis, 2021, 21(1): 246. |
| [14] | Mariconti M, Vola A, Manciulli T, et al. Role of microRNAs in host defense against Echinococcus granulosus infection: a preliminary assessment[J]. Immunol Res, 2019, 67(1): 93-97. |
| [15] | Orsten S, Baysal ?, Yabanoglu-Ciftci S, et al. MicroRNA expression profile in patients with cystic echinococcosis and identification of possible cellular pathways[J]. J Helminthol, 2021, 95: e1. |
| [16] | Xu JW, Li Y, Kang ML, et al. Multiple forms of cell death: a focus on the PI3K/AKT pathway[J]. J Cell Physiol, 2023, 238(9): 2026-2038. |
| [17] | Akbarzadeh M, Mihanfar A, Akbarzadeh S, et al. Crosstalk between miRNA and PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway in cancer[J]. Life Sci, 2021, 285: 119984. |
| [18] | Hu XP, Xie Q, Chen CF, et al. Let-7a inhibits T-cell proliferation and IFN-γ secretion by down-regulating STAT3 expression in patients with psoriasis[J]. Cell Physiol Biochem, 2017, 42(1): 115-125. |
| [19] | Wang JZ, Feng QL, Liang DK, et al. MiRNA-26a inhibits myocardial infarction-induced apoptosis by targeting PTEN via JAK/STAT pathways[J]. Cells Dev, 2021, 165: 203661. |
| [20] | Wang SL, Liu ZG, Wang JC, et al. miR-21 promotes osteoclastogenesis through activation of PI3K/Akt signaling by targeting Pten in RAW264.7 cells[J]. Mol Med Rep, 2020, 21(3): 1125-1132. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |