ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Evaluation of habitat adaptability of Dermacentor niveus and Dermacentor marginatus in Xinjiang based on maximum entropy model

  • Wen-wen HE ,
  • Jun WU ,
  • Er-cha HU ,
  • Li-mujiang A ,
  • Qian-yun SHI ,
  • Ming-dalai NUO ,
  • Lu GAN ,
  • Yun-wei HAO ,
  • Cha-han BAYIN
Expand
  • Department of Parasitology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China

Received date: 2021-06-01

  Revised date: 2021-07-22

  Online published: 2022-02-07

Supported by

National Key Research and Develop Plan(2017YFD0500401)

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the habitat adaptability of Dermacentor niveus and D. marginatus, and to provide reference for the prevention and control of the two tick species and their disease transmission. Methods The distribution sites of D. niveus and D. marginatus in Xinjiang from 1980 to 2017 were collected from the distribution and diversity data set of tick species in China, and the distribution sites of the two tick species in Xinjiang from 2017 to 2021 were collected through China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Baidu Academic, PubMed and other databases. Environmental variables were downloaded from the World Meteorological Database. The maximum entropy (MaxEnt) model was established with 75% data records as training subset and the remaining 25% as model evaluation subset. The main environmental variables were screened using the “Jackknife” method of MaxEnt model and the R software. MaxEnt species distribution prediction model and ArcGIS spatial analysis method were used to predict the breeding environment distribution of D. niveus and D. marginatus. The model output was presented using ArcMap 10.1, and the characteristics of ecological environment of the two tick species were predicted according to the response curves of bioclimatic variables plotted by MaxEnt model. Results A total of 46 and 64 distribution sites of D. niveus and D. marginatus were found from the screening, respectively, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values of the model assessment test subsets of D. niveus and D. marginatus were 0.847 and 0.815, respectively. From the 19 environmental variables, 8 environmental factors were screened out, which affect the survival of D. niveus and D. marginatus. The natural habitat prediction showed that the suitable habitats for D. niveus in Xinjiang were in the Junggar Basin, the Turpan Basin and the Tarim Basin; the suitable habitats for D. marginatus were in the Junggar Mountains, the Tianshan Mountains and the Kunlun Mountains. The areas of non-suitable habitat, low suitable habitat, moderate suitable habitat and high suitable habitat for D. niveus accounted for 35.80%, 29.18%, 10.32% and 24.70% of the total area of Xinjiang; while those for D. marginatus accounted for 33.62%, 17.01%, 17.08% and 32.28%, respectively. By the Jackknife method, the data screening found that precipitation of the driest month (Bio14), seasonal temperature change (Bio4), and mean temperature of the wettest quarter (Bio8) were the main environmental variable factor of D. niveus distribution, while the precipitation of the driest quarter (Bio17), annual precipitation (Bio12) and precipitation of wettest quarter (Bio16) were the main environmental variable factor of the distribution of D. marginatus. The response curve of main environmental variables showed that when the Bio14 was 21 mm, the coefficient of variation of Bio4 was 1 510, and Bio8 was 20 ℃, the existence probability of D. niveus was the highest; when Bio17 was 71 mm, Bio12 was 230 mm and Bio16 was 269 mm, the existence probability of D. marginatus was the highest. Conclusion MaxEnt model established exhibits high prediction precision and accuracy. It was demonstrated that low altitude area was the preferable habitat for D. niveus, whereas the high altitude area was the preferable habitat for D. marginatus. The precipitation in the driest month was the main environmental factor affecting the two tick species; the temperature was the primary environmental variable affecting D. niveus distribution, and precipitation was the primary environmental variable affecting D. marginatus distribution.

Cite this article

Wen-wen HE , Jun WU , Er-cha HU , Li-mujiang A , Qian-yun SHI , Ming-dalai NUO , Lu GAN , Yun-wei HAO , Cha-han BAYIN . Evaluation of habitat adaptability of Dermacentor niveus and Dermacentor marginatus in Xinjiang based on maximum entropy model[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF PARASITOLOGY AND PARASITIC DISEASES, 2022 , 40(1) : 68 -75 . DOI: 10.12140/j.issn.1000-7423.2022.01.010

References

[1] Wang Z. The identification and evolutionary analysis of portion Dermacentor species, and serology detected its carrying babesiosis in Xinjiang[D]. Urumqi: Xinjiang Agricultural University, 2014: 6-14. (in Chinese)
[1] (王真. 新疆部分革蜱种属鉴定、遗传进化分析及其携带牛巴贝斯虫的血清学检测[D]. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆农业大学, 2014: 6-14.)
[2] Maina AN, Speck S, Spitalska E, et al. Rickettsia species: rickettsioses[M]//BSL3 and BSL4 agents. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 2012: 123-148.
[3] Hajdušek O, Síma R, Ayllón N, et al. Interaction of the tick immune system with transmitted pathogens[J]. Front Cell Infect Microbiol, 2013, 3: 26.
[4] Wu H. Ultrastructural observation of four dominant Dermacentor species (Acari︰Ixodidae) and molecular detection of Anaplasma ovis carried by Dermacentor, Xinjiang[D]. Urumqi: Xinjiang Agricultural University, 2017: 14-19. (in Chinese)
[4] (吴辉. 新疆优势种革蜱超微结构鉴定及其携带绵羊无浆体的分子诊断[D]. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆农业大学, 2017: 14-19.)
[5] Gray JS, Dautel H, Estrada-Peña A, et al. Effects of climate change on ticks and tick-borne diseases in Europe[J]. Interdiscip Perspect Infect Dis, 2009, 2009: 593232.
[6] Shao ZJ. Overview of serious tick-borne diseases and vector ticks in China[J]. Chin J Hyg Insectic Equip, 2021, 27(4): 293-299. (in Chinese)
[6] (邵中军. 我国重要蜱传疾病及传播媒介研究概述[J]. 中华卫生杀虫药械, 2021, 27(4): 293-299.)
[7] Wardhana AH, Cecchi G, Muharsini S, et al. Environmental and phylogeographical determinants of the distribution of the Old World screwworm fly in Indonesia[J]. Acta Trop, 2014, 138(Suppl): S62-S68.
[8] Chen XM, Lei YC, Zhang XQ, et al. Effects of sample sizes on accuracy and stability of maximum entropy model in predicting species distribution[J]. Sci Silvae Sin, 2012, 48(1): 53-59. (in Chinese)
[8] (陈新美, 雷渊才, 张雄清, 等. 样本量对MaxEnt模型预测物种分布精度和稳定性的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2012, 48(1): 53-59.)
[9] Wang YS, Xie BY, Wan FH, et al. Application of ROC curve analysis in evaluating the performance of alien species’ potential distribution models[J]. Biodivers Sci, 2007, 15(4): 365-372. (in Chinese)
[9] (王运生, 谢丙炎, 万方浩, 等. ROC曲线分析在评价入侵物种分布模型中的应用[J]. 生物多样性, 2007, 15(4): 365-372.)
[10] Zhao GP. Spatial distribution of ticks and their hazard prediction in China[D]. Beijing: Academy of Military Sciences, 2018: 32-33. (in Chinese)
[10] (赵国平. 中国蜱类空间分布及其危害预测[D]. 北京: 军事科学院, 2018: 32-33.)
[11] Zhang GS, Zheng D, Tian YQ, et al. A dataset of distribution and diversity of ticks in China[J]. Sci Data, 2019, 6(1): 105.
[12] Anderson RP, Gonzalez I Jr. Species-specific tuning increases robustness to sampling bias in models of species distributions: an implementation with Maxent[J]. Ecol Model, 2011, 222(15): 2796-2811.
[13] He QJ, Zhou GS. Climatic suitability of potential summer maize planting zones in China[J]. Acta Geogr Sin, 2011, 66(11): 1443-1450. (in Chinese)
[13] (何奇瑾, 周广胜. 我国夏玉米潜在种植分布区的气候适宜性研究[J]. 地理学报, 2011, 66(11): 1443-1450.)
[14] Phillips SJ, Anderson RP, Dudík M, et al. Opening the black box: an open-source release of Maxent[J]. Ecography, 2017, 40(7): 887-893.
[15] Liu B, Qin WQ, Yan W. Potential geographical distribution of Paraleyrodes minei (Hemiptera︰Aleyrodidae) in China based on Maxent model[J]. J Environ Entomol, 2019, 41(6): 1276-1286. (in Chinese)
[15] (刘博, 覃伟权, 阎伟. 基于MaxEnt模型的小巢粉虱在中国的潜在地理分布[J]. 环境昆虫学报, 2019, 41(6): 1276-1286.)
[16] Seoane J, Bustamante J, Díaz-Delgado R. Competing roles for landscape, vegetation, topography and climate in predictive models of bird distribution[J]. Ecol Model, 2004, 171(3): 209-222.
[17] Zhang YK, Liu JZ. Diversity, and roles, of pathogens and symbionts in ticks[J]. Chin J Appl Entomol, 2019, 56(1): 1-11. (in Chinese)
[17] (张艳凯, 刘敬泽. 蜱类病原体和共生菌多样性及其作用[J]. 应用昆虫学报, 2019, 56(1): 1-11.)
[18] Hu XK, Hao YW, Xia S, et al. Detection of schistosomiasis transmission risks in Yunnan Province based on ecological niche modeling[J]. Chin J Parasitol Parasit Dis, 2020, 38(1): 80-86, 94. (in Chinese)
[18] (胡小康, 郝瑜婉, 夏尚, 等. 基于生态位模型的云南省血吸虫病传播风险探测研究[J]. 中国寄生虫学与寄生虫病杂志, 2020, 38(1): 80-86, 94.)
[19] Ehdaie B. Variation in water-use efficiency and its components in wheat: Ⅱ. pot and field experiments[J]. Crop Sci, 1995, 35(6): 1617-1626.
[20] Phillips SJ, Anderson RP, Schapire RE. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions[J]. Ecol Model, 2006, 190(3/4): 231-259.
[21] Phillips SJ. A brief tutorial on MaxEnt[EB/OL]. (2017-01-01)[2021-06-01]. http://biodiversityinformatics.amnh.org/open_source/maxent/
[22] Lu XY, Jiang L, Ye YY, et al. Study on potential geographical distribution of Phauda flammans Walker in China based on the MaxEnt model[J]. J Environ Entomol, 2019, 41(6): 1268-1275. (in Chinese)
[22] (卢小雨, 蒋露, 叶奕优, 等. 基于MaxEnt模型的朱红毛斑蛾在我国的潜在地理分布[J]. 环境昆虫学报, 2019, 41(6): 1268-1275.)
[23] Wu RC, Gan S, Li QQ. Research on neolithic site prediction distribution in Yulin area based on maxent model[J]. Comput Eng Softw, 2019, 40(9): 148-152. (in Chinese)
[23] (吴瑞婵, 甘淑, 李强强. 基于Maxent模型的榆林地区新石器时代遗址预测分布研究[J]. 软件, 2019, 40(9): 148-152.)
[24] Giovannini A, Seglie D, Giacoma C. Identifying priority areas for conservation of spadefoot toad, Pelobates fuscus insubricus using a maximum entropy approach[J]. Biodivers Conserv, 2014, 23(6): 1427-1439.
[25] Mengesha HA. Conducting and analyzing openmodeller and maximum entropy model software for species distribution modeling using arc GIS[J]. J Biol Agric Healthc, 2017, 7(3): 58-71.
[26] Yu X, Ye RY, Gong ZD. Ticks in Xinjiang[M]. Urumqi: Science and Technology Health Press, 1997: 7-8. (in Chinese)
[26] (于心, 叶瑞玉, 龚正达. 新疆蜱类志[M]. 乌鲁木齐: 科技卫生出版社, 1997: 7-8.)
Outlines

/

〈 〉