FROM ENDEMIC TO PRELIMINARY CONTROL--SPECIAL REPORTS ON ECHINOCOCCOSIS IN SICHUAN PROVINCE

Exploration of a health education model and evaluation of its effect on echinococcosis control among students in Tibetan community, Sichuan Province

  • Guang-jia ZHANG ,
  • Qian WANG ,
  • Yang LIU ,
  • Bo ZHONG ,
  • Ze-li DANBA ,
  • Chu-mu LUORONG ,
  • Qv-zhen JIANGYANG ,
  • Zhi-qiang LAN ,
  • Yan HUANG ,
  • Wen-jie YU
Expand
  • 1 Sichuan Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Chengdu 610041, China
    2 Ganzi Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Kangding 626000, China
    3 Daofu Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Daofu 626400, China

Received date: 2020-12-31

  Revised date: 2021-02-26

  Online published: 2021-04-30

Supported by

Sichuan Province Science and Technology Planning Project(2018SZ0116)

Abstract

Objective To explore the intervention effects of targeted health education on the knowledge of echinococcosis prevention and treatment and the practice rate of healthy behavior among students, and provide reference for implementation of health education of echinococcosis on classified base. Methods All students in the central primary schools in Bamei and Longdeng Townships in Daofu County, were assigned as the intervention group, and all students in the central primary school Qimei and Xianshui Townships were assigned as the control group. From 2016 to 2020, students in the control group were provided with conventional echinococcosis health education, and students in the intervention group were provided with additional special interventions. In each year, 150 students randomly selected from each grade of grades 3-6 in each school were surveyed. A questionnaire was used to assess the awareness rate of knowledge of echinococcosis control and the formation rate of health behavior among the students. Results In 2016, before the intervention, the awareness rates of knowledge of echinococcosis control in the intervention and control groups were 77.0% and 74.3%, respectively, and the formation rates of health behavior were 68.5% and 70.6%, respectively, with no significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05). After the intervention, the awareness rate and behavior formation rate of students in both groups increased from 82.8% and 71.9% in 2017 to 93.1% and 85.5% in 2020, respectively (P < 0.05), and the intervention effect was better in the intervention group compared with the control group. The difference in the knowledge awareness rate between the two groups began to be significant in the first year after the intervention (82.8% and 77.4% in 2017) (P < 0.05), while the difference in the behavior formation rate began to be significant in the second year (78.5% and 75.1% in 2018) (P < 0.05), with a significant lagging response in behavior formation. In the control group, the awareness rate and behavior formation rate did not show significant difference between different years (P > 0.05), while in the intervention group, the awareness rate and behavior formation rate showed significant differences during 2016—2019 and 2017—2019, respectively (P < 0.05). Meanwhile, the awareness rate and behavior formation rate of students in the intervention group did not show significant difference between 2019 and 2020 (P > 0.05), indicating the intervention had gained steady achievements. The stratified analysis on the results demonstrated that after 4 year-consecutive health education, the difference in awareness rate between the intervention group and the control group was statistically significant in both boys and girls in 2020 (P < 0.05). The difference in awareness rate between the intervention group and the control group was statistically significant in all grades from 3 to 6 (P < 0.05). The difference in awareness rate between the intervention and the control groups was statistically significant in both Han Chinese and Tibetans (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups in other ethnicities (P > 0.05). In addition, there was a significant difference in behavior formation rate between the intervention group and the control group in girls (P < 0.05). There was a significant difference in behavior formation rate between the intervention group and the control group in grades 4-6 (P < 0.05). Statistically significant differences in the behavior formation rate between the intervention and control groups were found in Tibetan and Han Chinese (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups in male students, at grade 3, or in other ethnic groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion The health education pertinent to students can help improving their awareness of echinococcosis knowledge and forming health behavioral habits.

Cite this article

Guang-jia ZHANG , Qian WANG , Yang LIU , Bo ZHONG , Ze-li DANBA , Chu-mu LUORONG , Qv-zhen JIANGYANG , Zhi-qiang LAN , Yan HUANG , Wen-jie YU . Exploration of a health education model and evaluation of its effect on echinococcosis control among students in Tibetan community, Sichuan Province[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF PARASITOLOGY AND PARASITIC DISEASES, 2021 , 39(2) : 145 -149 . DOI: 10.12140/j.issn.1000-7423.2021.02.003

References

[1] Wu WP, Wang H, Wang Q, et al. A nationwide sampling survey on echinococcosis in China during 2012—2016[J]. Chin J Parasitol Parasit Dis, 2018,36(1):1-14. (in Chinese)
[1] ( 伍卫平, 王虎, 王谦, 等. 2012—2016年中国棘球蚴病抽样调查分析[J]. 中国寄生虫学与寄生虫病杂志, 2018,36(1):1-14.)
[2] Wang Q, Yang L, Wang Y, et al. Disease burden of echinococcosis in Tibetan communities: a significant public health issue in an underdeveloped region of western China[J]. Acta Trop, 2019: 105283.
[3] Jenkins D. WHO/OIE manual on echinococcosis in humans and animals: a public health problem of global concern[J]. Int J Parasitol, 2001,31(14):1717-1718.
[4] Patel A McCrone P Leese M, et al. Cost-effectiveness of adherence therapy versus health education for people with schizophrenia: randomised controlled trial in four European countries[J]. Cost Eff Resour Alloc, 2013,11(1):12.
[5] Jiang L, Chen DZ. Health education in the prevention and treatment of echinococcosis[J]. Bull Dis Control Prev, 2011,26(6):62-63. (in Chinese)
[5] ( 姜磊, 陈大忠. 包虫病防治工作中的健康教育[J]. 疾病预防控制通报, 2011,26(6):62-63.)
[6] Xiao N, Zhou ZJ, Chen XW, et al. Assessment of health education against echinococcosis in Tibetan region of Sichuan Province, China[J]. Chin J Parasitol Parasit Dis, 2012,30(1):6-11. (in Chinese)
[6] ( 肖宁, 周章俊, 陈兴旺, 等. 四川省藏区防治棘球蚴病健康教育效果评价[J]. 中国寄生虫学与寄生虫病杂志, 2012,30(1):6-11.)
[7] Li C, Wang Q, Hang YM, et al. Evaluation of the effect of the teacher-in-charge and student-participatory education on the intervention of echinococcosis among Tibetan students in Aba Prefecture[J]. Chin J Sch Health, 2019,40(10):123-125. (in Chinese)
[7] ( 李程, 王谦, 杭玉梅, 等. 班主任和学生参与式教育对阿坝州藏族学生包虫病干预效果评价[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2019,40(10):123-125.)
[8] Li XS. Medical Statistics[M]. 2nd ed. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2008: 269-270. (in Chinese)
[8] ( 李晓松. 医学统计学[M]. 2版. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2008: 269-270.)
[9] Li D, Gao Q, Liu J, et al. Knowledge, attitude, and practices (KAP) and risk factors analysis related to cystic echinococcosis among residents in Tibetan communities, Xiahe County, Gansu Province, China[J]. Acta Trop, 2015,147:17-22.
[10] Elyar E, Ayxamgul A, Li BL, et al. Research progress on health education of echinococcosis in China and other foreign countries[J]. Ocuup Health, 2019,35(20):2863-2867. (in Chinese)
[10] ( 艾力亚力·艾力, 阿依谢姆古丽·阿力马斯, 李波霖, 等. 国内外包虫病健康教育研究进展[J]. 职业与健康, 2019,35(20):2863-2867.)
Outlines

/

〈 〉