CHINESE JOURNAL OF PARASITOLOGY AND PARASITIC DISEASES >
Comparison of status of soil-transmitted helminth infection between poverty and non-poverty areas in Jiangxi Province
Received date: 2020-05-09
Online published: 2020-11-12
Supported by
Jiangxi Province Key Lab Project(2019BCD40006);Science and Technology Planning Project of Jiangxi Health Commission(20152019);Science and Technology Planning Project of Jiangxi Health Commission(20176028);Science and Technology Planning Project of Jiangxi Health Commission(20204868)
Objective To compare and analyze the status of soil-transmitted helminth (STH) infection between poverty and non-poverty areas in Jiangxi Province, in order to provide scientific basis for precise parasitic diseases control. Methods According to the protocol of the 3rd National Human Parasitic Diseases Survey in 2014, the survey sites for current study were sampled using the stratified cluster sampling method based on the economic and geographical characteristics of Jiangxi Province. From each sampled natural village, 250 villagers were randomly selected for fecal examination by modified Kato-Katz thick smear method to estimate the prevalence of STH infection. Meanwhile, 60 villagers who participated in fecal examinationin each survey site were randomly selected for the questionnaire survey. According to the list of poverty counties in Jiangxi Province issued by the government, the survey data and information of major parasitic diseases in Jiangxi Province in 2014 were sorted and analyzed. The comparison of infection rate between the poverty areas and the non-poverty areas was made by the Chi-square test. Results A total of 92 survey sites of 32 counties in Jiangxi Province were surveyed. The average infection rates of STH, Ascaris lumbricoides and Trichuris trichiura in the poverty areas were 6.97% (466/6 690), 2.20% (147/6 6690) and 2.42% (162/6 690), respectively, which were significantly higher than those of the non-poverty areas [6.04% (1 022/16 916), 0.35% (59/16 916) and 0.37% (63/16 916), respectively] (P < 0.01). The average infection rate of hookworm in non-poverty areas was 5.44% (920/16 916), which was significantly higher than the 2.71% (181/16 916) in poverty areas (P < 0.01). The infection rates of STH and hookworm in both poverty and non-poverty areas showed a trend of increase with age, which peaked in the age group of ≥70 (9.54%, 44/461; 13.13%, 184/1 401; respectively). The infection rates of A. lumbricoides peaked in the age group of <10 in the poverty areas (3.07%, 29/946) and in the age group of 20-29 years in the non-poverty areas (0.55%, 6/1 088). The infection rates of T. trichiura peaked in the age group of ≥70 in the poverty areas (3.69%, 17/461) and in the age group of 10-19 years in the non-poverty areas (0.60%, 9/1 491). The infection rates of STH in the age group of <10 and in the age group of 30-39 years in the poverty areas [4.97% (47/946), 5.64% (44/780)] were higher than those in the non-poverty areas [1.10% (28/2 534), 2.73% (46/1 685)], respectively (P < 0.01). The infection rates of hookworm in the age groups of 40-49 years and above in the non-poverty areas [4.67% (140/2 999), 7.40% (237/3 203), 10.66% (268/2 515), 13.13% (184/1 401)] were higher than those in the poverty areas [2.70% (30/1 111), 3.34% (40/1 999), 4.72% (43/911), 9.54% (44/461)], respectively (P < 0.01). The infection rates of A. lumbricoides in all age groups except the age group of 20-29 years in the poverty areas were higher than those in the non-poverty areas, and the infection rates of T. trichiura in all age groups except the group aged 10-19 years in the poverty areas were higher than those in the non-poverty areas. In both the poverty and non-poverty areas, the infection rates of STH [8.66% (290/3 348), 6.66% (581/8 720)], hookworm [3.58% (120/3 348), 6.06% (528/8 720)] and T. trichiura [2.63% (88/3 348), 0.42% (37/8 720)] in females, were higher than those in males [5.27% (176/3 342), 5.38% (441/8 196); 1.83% (61/3 342), 4.78(392/8 196) and 2.21% (74/3 342), 0.32%(26/8 196), respetively] (P < 0.01). In the poverty areas, the infection rate of A. lumbricoides in females (2.75%, (93/3 348) was higher than that in males (1.65%, 55/3 342) (P < 0.01). In females, the infection rate of STH in the poverty areas was higher than that in the non-poverty areas (P < 0.01). The infection rates of A. lumbricoides and T. trichiura both in female and males in the poverty areas were higher than those in the non-poverty areas (P < 0.01); and the infection rates of hookworm both in female and males were higher in the non-poverty areas than in the poverty areas (P < 0.01). The proportion of safe toilets in the non-poverty areas was 52.06%, significantly lower than that in the poverty areas(61.23%, P < 0.01). The rate of fertilization with fresh feces was 36.31% in the non-poverty areas, which did not differ significantly from the 33.72% in the poverty areas (P > 0.05); in addition, 55.20% and 63.62% of residents in the non-poverty and poverty areas respectively had the habit of working barefoot in field. Conclusion The survey data indicates that the key target parasites for control are hookworm in non-poverty areas, while A. lumbricoides, hookworm and T. trichiura in poverty areas, and the population at the age of 40-49 years and above is the main target for hookworm control and populations at the age of 40-49 years and below is the main target for control of A. lumbricoides and T. trichiura.
Xiao-jun ZENG , Wei-sheng JIANG , Jun GE , Shu-ying XIE , Zhao-jun LI , Chun-qin HANG , Dong LI . Comparison of status of soil-transmitted helminth infection between poverty and non-poverty areas in Jiangxi Province[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF PARASITOLOGY AND PARASITIC DISEASES, 2020 , 38(5) : 548 -553 . DOI: 10.12140/j.issn.1000-7423.2020.05.004
| [1] | Zeng XJ, Jiang WS, Xie SY, et al. Trends of soil-transmittednematode infections in Jiangxi Province[J]. Chin J Schisto Control, 2017,29(6):710-715. (in Chinese) |
| [1] | ( 曾小军, 姜唯声, 谢曙英, 等. 江西省土源性线虫病流行趋势分析[J]. 中国血吸虫病防治杂志, 2017,29(6):710-715.) |
| [2] | Wang LD. Report on the national survey of important human parasitic diseases in China [M]. Beijing: People’s Medical Publishing House, 2008: 3-27. (in Chinese) |
| [2] | ( 王陇德. 全国人体重要寄生虫现状调查报告[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2008: 3-27.) |
| [3] | Xu LQ, Jiang ZX, Zhou CH, et al. To learn from the advanced experience of Japan and South Korea to promote the intestinal parasitic diseases control in China[J]. Chin J Parasit Dis Control, 1997,10(4):241-245. (in Chinese) |
| [3] | ( 许隆祺, 蒋则孝, 周长海, 等. 学习日本、韩国先进经验促进我国肠道寄生虫病防治工作[J]. 中国寄生虫病防治杂志, 1997,10(4):241-245.) |
| [4] | Coordinating Office of the National Survey on the Important Human Parasitic Diseases. A national survey on current status of the important parasitic diseases in human population[J]. Chin J Parasitol Parasit Dis, 2005,23(S):332-340. (in Chinese) |
| [4] | ( 全国人体重要寄生虫病现状调查办公室. 全国人体重要寄生虫病现状调查报告[J]. 中国寄生虫学与寄生虫病杂志, 2005,23(增刊):332-340. |
| [5] | Zeng XJ, Li ZJ, Jiang WS, et al. Survey of epidemic status of principal human parasites in Jiangxi Province in 2014[J]. Chin J Schisto Control, 2015,27(6):595-599. (in Chinese) |
| [5] | ( 曾小军, 李召军, 姜唯声, 等. 2014年江西省人体重点寄生虫感染现状[J]. 中国血吸虫病防治杂志, 2015,27(6):595-599.) |
| [6] | Xu LQ. Distribution and pathogenic impact of human parasites in China[M]. Beijing: People’s Medical Publishing House, 2000. (in Chinese). |
| [6] | ( 许隆祺. 中国人体寄生虫分布与危害[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2000.) |
| [7] | Zhou XN. Report on the national survey of important human parasitic diseases in China (2015)[M]. Beijing: People’s Medical Publishing House, 2018: 39-105. (in Chinese) |
| [7] | ( 周晓农. 2015年全国人体重点寄生虫现状调查报告[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2018: 39-105.) |
| [8] | Zeng XJ, Jiang WS, Xie SY, et al. Effect of integrated control intervention on soil-transmitted helminth infections in Jiangxi Province in southeast China[J]. Acta Trop, 2019,194:148-154. |
| [9] | Zeng XJ, Jiang WS, Chen HG, et al. Influence and trend of natural and social factors on the epidemic of soil-transmitted nematodes in Jiangxi Province[J]. Jiangxi Med J, 2004,39(S):17-19. (in Chinese) |
| [9] | ( 曾小军, 姜唯声, 陈红根, 等. 自然和社会因素对江西省土源性线虫流行的影响分析及趋势分析[J]. 江西医药, 2004,39(增刊):17-19.) |
| [10] | Huang BN, Zeng XJ, Jiang WS, et al. Survey and analysis of hookworm infection among rural residents in Jiangxi Province[J]. Parasit Infect Dis, 2005,3(3):122-123. (in Chinese) |
| [10] | ( 黄北南, 曾小军, 姜唯声, 等. 江西省农村居民钩虫感染状况调查发现[J]. 寄生虫病与感染性疾病, 2005,3(3):122-123.) |
| [11] | Xie SY, Gong ZH, Chen Z, et al. Current status of human hookworm infection in Jiangxi Province in 2014[J]. Chin J Schisto Control, 2018,30(4):446-448, 471. (in Chinese) |
| [11] | ( 谢曙英, 龚志红, 陈喆, 等. 2014年江西省人体钩虫感染现状调查[J]. 中国血吸虫病防治杂志, 2018,30(4):446-448, 471.) |
| [12] | Zhou CH, Zang W, Wang GF. Effect of ancylostomiasis control in 6 demonstration plots of parasitic disease comprehensive control[J]. Chin J Schisto Control, 2011,23(5):506-509. (in Chinese) |
| [12] | ( 周长海, 臧炜, 王国飞. 6个寄生虫病综合防治示范区钩虫病防治效果[J]. 中国血吸虫病防治杂志, 2011,23(5):506-509.) |
| [13] | Zhang Q, Chen YD, Xu LQ, et al. Effect of control on infections of soil-transmitted helminthes in demonstration plots of China for 3 years[J]. Chin J Schisto Control, 2011,23(5):476-482. (in Chinese) |
| [13] | ( 张倩, 陈颖丹, 许隆祺, 等. 我国土源性线虫病综合防治示范区3年防治效果[J]. 中国血吸虫病防治杂志, 2011,23(5):476-482.) |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |