The Role of Medical Institutions in the Control of Imported Malaria Since the Initiation of Malaria Elimination Program in Henan Province

Previous Articles     Next Articles

The Role of Medical Institutions in the Control of Imported Malaria Since the Initiation of Malaria Elimination Program in Henan Province

YANG Cheng-yun, QIAN Dan, ZHANG Ya-lan, CHEN Wei-qi, LIU Ying,ZHOU Rui-min, LU De-ling, ZHANG Hong-wei*, ZHAO Yu-ling   

  1. Center for Disease Control and Prevention of Henan Province, Zhengzhou 450016, China
  • Online:2016-04-30 Published:2016-06-30

PDF (PC)

Abstract: Objective To retrospectively overview the diagnosis and treatment of malaria during 2010-2014 in Henan Province and understand the role of medical institutions in imported malaria control. Methods Information on malaria epidemic situation as well as its diagnosis and treatment during 2010-2014 in Henan Province was collected from the infectious disease surveillance system and information management system for the prevention and treatment of parasitic disease. Descriptive analysis was performed to determine the role of medical institutions in the reporting, diagnosis and treatment of malaria. Results A total of 821 imported malaria cases were reported during 2010-2014 in Henan Province, among whom 12 died, with a case fatality rate of 1.7%. The 12 deaths were all due to falciparum malaria and from Africa. The number of cases reported by medical institutions and disease control agencies were 432（52.6%） and 389（47.4%）, respectively. Among the 569 imported malaria cases with diagnosis records, 380 were determined to be malaria at first-diagnosis, with a diagnostic accuracy of 66.8%（380/569）. The accuracy of first diagnosis by medical institutions（49.2%, 178/362） was significantly lower than that by disease control agencies（97.6%, 202/207）（χ2=139.147, P<0.01）. The accuracy of first diagnosis by medical institutions at the town-ship level or below, the county level, the city/prefecture level and the provincial level was 14.2%（18/127）, 43.4% （23/53）, 73.6%（67/97） and 76.9%（70/91）, respectively（χ2=112.764, P<0.01）. However, there was no significant difference in the accuracy among disease control agencies of the above levels（χ2=0.380, P＞0.05）. The cases diagnosed by medical institutions and disease control agencies constituted 48.9%（278/569） and 51.1%（291/569）, respectively, with no significant difference（χ2=0.594, P＞0.05）. In addition, the cases diagnosed by medical institutions at the town-ship level or below, the county level, the city/prefecture level and the provincial level constituted 1.2%（7/569）, 3.7%（21/569）, 12.5%（71/569） and 31.5%（179/569）, respectively（χ2=299.143, P<0.01）. Similar results were also obtained for disease control agencies of the above levels（χ2=91.569, P<0.01）. Conclusion There are considerable differneces of the first diagnosis accuracy and the diagnosis rate among medical institutions of different levels. Medical institutions of lower levels, which establish a diagnosis mainly based on microscopic examination, have lower diagnosis rate than the disease control agencies at same levels.

Key words: Elimination, Imported malaria, Medical institution, Retrospective analysis, Henan