中国寄生虫学与寄生虫病杂志 ›› 1993, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (3): 185-189.

• • 上一篇    下一篇

应用疟疾传播数学模型比较疟疾与丝虫病的传播动力学及防治效应

吴开琭,吴开琛   

  1. 海南师范学院数学研究所; 中国预防医学科学院寄生虫病研究所(世界卫生组织疟疾、血吸虫病和丝虫病合作中心)
  • 收稿日期:2017-01-06 修回日期:2017-01-06 出版日期:1993-08-31 发布日期:2017-01-06

COMPARISON OF THE TRANSMISSION DYNAMICS AND THE CONTROL EFFECTS BETWEEN MALARIA AND FILARIASIS BY USING MATHEMATICAL MODEL

  • Received:2017-01-06 Revised:2017-01-06 Online:1993-08-31 Published:2017-01-06

摘要: 通过 Ross&MacDonald 疟疾模型模拟计算的比较,指出了疟疾传播快,丝虫病传播慢的现象,其动力学机制是由于丝虫的感染效率比疟疾低得多,从而导致媒介能量,即传播速率明显低于疟疾。由于丝虫的感染度对感染效率影响很大,通过服药治疗,特别是普服药盐措施,降低感染度和感染效率,可以使媒介能量或传播速率降至临界水平以下,从而达到阻断传播的目的。而在疟疾,只有通过防制蚊媒(包括防蚊),才能降低媒介能量和传播速率,从而在根本上控制疟疾。上述理论分析正在为我国疟疾和丝虫病的防治实践所证实。

关键词: 疟疾, 丝虫病, 传播动力学, 数学模型

Abstract: By dynamic modeling based on Ross MacDonald's mathematical model, the characteristics of rapid transmission of malaria and slow transmission of filariasis was compared. The dynamic mechanism showed that the infection efficiency in filariasis, namely, the probability of becoming infected in man by one infective bite of mosquito, was much lower than that in malaria; hence the vectorial capacity or transmission velocity in filariasis was also markedly lower than that in malaria. Since the intensity of infection i. e. the microfilaria density can largely affect the infection efficiency in filariasis, drug treatment, especially using DEC -medicated salt can reduce the intensity of infection and the infection efficiency, thus interrupting transmission finally. However, for malaria, only when the measures for mosquito vector control (including mosquito proofing) are taken as a priority to reduce the vectorial capacity or transmission velocity, malaria can then be controlled subsequently. These theoretical analyses are being demonstrated by the practice for malaria and filariasis control in our country, which could also be used as a theoretical base for enlightening the successful filariasis control strategies in our country.