中国寄生虫学与寄生虫病杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (1): 84-90.doi: 10.12140/j.issn.1000-7423.2025.01.013

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

多房棘球蚴感染巨噬细胞中CD47和SIRPα表达变化与抑制作用的研究

魏盼龙1(), 张耀刚2, 张涛3, 杨紫晗3, 侯静2, 田美媛2, 黄登亮2, 马艳艳4,*()   

  1. 1 青海大学研究生院,青海 西宁 810000
    2 青海大学附属医院中心实验室,青海 西宁 810000
    3 青海大学附属医院,青海 西宁 810000
    4 青海大学附属医院科研管理处,青海 西宁 810000
  • 收稿日期:2024-11-05 修回日期:2025-01-20 出版日期:2025-02-28 发布日期:2025-03-26
  • 通讯作者: 马艳艳,女,博导,教授,从事感染性疾病与免疫研究。E-mail:mayanyan_research@qhu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:魏盼龙,男,硕士研究生,从事寄生虫感染与免疫研究。E-mail:WeiPanLong1990@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(81960129);国家自然科学基金(82360128);青海省“昆仑英才·高端创新创业人才”和青海大学附属医院中青年项目(ASRF-2023-ZD-02)

Research on the expression changes and inhibitory effects of CD47 and SIRPα in macrophages infected with Echinococcus multilocularis

WEI Panlong1(), ZHANG Yaogang2, ZHANG Tao3, YANG Zihan3, HOU Jing2, TIAN Meiyuan2, HUANG Dengliang2, MA Yanyan4,*()   

  1. 1 Graduate School of Qinghai University, Xining 810000, Qinghai, China
    2 Central Laboratory, Affiliated Hospital of Qinghai University, Xining 810000, Qinghai, China
    3 Affiliated Hospital of Qinghai University, Xining 810000, Qinghai, China
    4 Department of Scientific Research Management, Affiliated Hospital of Qinghai University, Xining 810000, Qinghai, China
  • Received:2024-11-05 Revised:2025-01-20 Online:2025-02-28 Published:2025-03-26
  • Contact: E-mail: mayanyan_research@qhu.edu.cn
  • Supported by:
    National Natural Science Foundation of China(81960129);National Natural Science Foundation of China(82360128);Qinghai Province “Kunlun Talents High-end Innovative and Entrepreneurial” and the Qinghai University Affiliated Hospital for Young and Middle-aged Project(ASRF-2023-ZD-02)

摘要:

目的 探究多房棘球蚴感染对巨噬细胞CD47与信号调节蛋白α(SIRPα)表达水平及巨噬细胞功能的影响,为探索多房棘球蚴病(AE)发病机制提供依据。方法 收集30例AE患者的肝脏病理组织,选取病灶周围0.5 cm处的病灶近旁肝组织(CLT)和超过病灶2 cm以上的病灶远端肝组织(DLT),石蜡切片行免疫组化、冰冻切片行免疫荧光,观察分析CLT和DLT中CD47和SIRPα的表达水平。小鼠单核巨噬细胞白血病细胞(RAW264.7)与多房棘球蚴原头节共培养(细胞数∶原头节数 = 500∶1),分别于加入原头节前、共培养24和48 h后收集细胞,流式细胞术、细胞免疫荧光和实时荧光定量PCR(qPCR)检测巨噬细胞CD47和SIRPα的表达变化。RAW264.7细胞分为对照组、感染组、抑制剂组和抑制剂感染组(1 × 105个/组),感染组和抑制剂感染组加入原头节(200个/组)、抑制剂组和抑制剂感染组加入CD47/SIRPα结合抑制剂(NCGC00138783TFA,10 μmol/L),共培养48 h后加入增强型绿色荧光蛋白(EGFP)标记的大肠埃希菌(1 × 106个/组),荧光观察后流式细胞术检测巨噬细胞吞噬能力变化,qPCR检测巨噬细胞极化标志物和细胞因子mRNA相对转录水平的变化。两组间比较采用独立样本t检验或配对t检验,多组间比较用单因素方差分析,多重比较使用Tukey’s HSD法。结果 免疫组化结果显示,AE患者CLT的CD47、SIRPα阳性细胞分别占(61.99 ± 3.61)%、(54.06 ± 1.85)%,均高于DLT的(57.08 ± 3.38)%、(40.77 ± 1.49)%(t = 9.434、58.840,均P < 0.01);免疫荧光结果显示,CLT的CD47/SIRPα皮尔逊相关系数为0.66 ± 0.02,高于DLT的0.45 ± 0.01(t = 7.624,P < 0.01)。流式检测结果显示,共培养24和48 h后的巨噬细胞CD47中位荧光强度分别为8 259.00 ± 66.01和9 445.00 ± 41.58,均高于加入原头节前的5 603.00 ± 193.40(HSD = 0.691、0.735,均P < 0.01);共培养24和48 h后的巨噬细胞SIRPα中位荧光强度分别为3 123.00 ± 184.60和2 931.00 ± 54.08,均高于加入原头节前的2 508.00 ± 43.15(HSD = 0.491、0.235,均P < 0.01)。qPCR结果显示,共培养24和48 h后的巨噬细胞CD47 mRNA相对转录水平分别为1.80 ± 0.02和1.64 ± 0.01,均高于加入原头节前的0.99 ± 0.01(HSD = 0.098、0.125,均P < 0.01);加入原头节前、共培养24和48 h后的巨噬细胞SIRPα mRNA相对转录水平分别为1.00 ± 0.02、0.52 ± 0.05和1.27 ± 0.03,24 h后低于加入原头节前(HSD = 0.015,P < 0.01),48 h后高于加入原头节前(HSD = 0.105,P < 0.01)。免疫荧光结果显示,共培养24和48 h后的CD47/SIRPα皮尔逊相关系数分别为0.920 ± 0.001和0.990 ± 0.001,均高于加入原头节前的0.770 ± 0.001(HSD = 0.091、0.135,均P < 0.01)。荧光结果显示,抑制剂感染组的EGFP平均荧光强度为8 923.0 ± 49.3,高于感染组的7 537.0 ± 29.3(HSD = 0.205,P < 0.01);流式检测结果显示,抑制剂感染组的EGFP平均荧光强度为21.54 ± 0.03,高于感染组的18.55 ± 0.51(HSD = 0.327,P < 0.01)。qPCR结果显示,抑制剂感染组M1型标志物诱导型一氧化氮合酶(iNOS)、CD86的mRNA相对转录水平分别为20.87 ± 0.40、40.64 ± 0.75,均高于感染组的5.38 ± 0.11和3.79 ± 0.05(HSD = 0.194、0.261,均P < 0.01);M2型标志物精氨酸酶1(Arg1)、CD206的mRNA相对转录水平分别为48.76 ± 2.22、6.33 ± 0.06,均低于感染组的83.28 ± 0.58和12.33 ± 0.12(HSD = 0.283、0.164,均P < 0.01)。抑制剂感染组M1型细胞因子白细胞介素6(IL-6)、IL-1β、、肿瘤坏死因子α(TNF-α)的mRNA相对转录水平分别为3 896.00 ± 176.70、271.30 ± 8.39和4.90 ± 0.10,均高于感染组的2 869.00 ± 89.55、154.90 ± 2.61和3.04 ± 0.03(HSD = 0.712、0.625、0.693,P < 0.05、0.01、0.01);M2型细胞因子IL-10、转化生长因子β(TGF-β)的mRNA相对转录水平分别为127.40 ± 4.92、1.34 ± 0.03,均低于感染组的380.30 ± 8.55和1.61 ± 0.02(HSD = 0.324、0.163,均P < 0.01)。结论 多房棘球蚴感染后巨噬细胞的CD47和SIRPα表达升高、吞噬能力下降,特异性抑制CD47/SIRPα结合能够改善巨噬细胞吞噬功能并促进巨噬细胞向M1型极化。

关键词: 多房棘球蚴, 免疫检查点, 吞噬作用, 巨噬细胞极化

Abstract:

Objective To investigate the effects of Echinococcus multilocularis infection on the expression of CD47 and signal regulatory protein α (SIRPα) in macrophages and the function of macrophages, and to provide evidence for exploring the pathogenesis of alveolar echinococcosis (AE). Methods Liver tissue samples were collected from 30 AE patients. Tissues were categorized into close liver tissue (CLT) located 0.5 cm from the lesion and distal liver tissue (DLT) located more than 2 cm from the lesion. Paraffin sections were used for immunohistochemistry and frozen sections were used for immunofluorescence to analyze the expression levels of CD47 and SIRPα in CLT and DLT. Mouse monocyte-macrophage leukemia cells (RAW264.7) were co-cultured with E. multilocularis protoscoleces at a ratio of 500 ∶ 1. Cells were collected before the addition of protoscoleces and after co-culture for 24 and 48 hours, respectively. The expression changes of CD47 and SIRPα in macrophages were detected by flow cytometry, cellular immunofluorescence and quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR). RAW264.7 cells were divided into control group, infection group, inhibitor group and inhibitor-infection group (1 × 105 cells per group). The infection group and inhibitor-infection group were supplemented with protoscoleces (200 per group), while the inhibitor group and inhibitor-infection group were treated with a CD47/SIRPα binding inhibitor (NCGC00138783TFA, 10 µmol/L). Enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP)-labeled Escherichia coli were added to each group (1 × 106 per group) after co-culture for 48 hourse. Following fluorescence observation, the phagocytic capacity of macrophages was assessed by flow cytometry. Additionally, the mRNA relative transcription levels of macrophage polarization markers and cytokines were detected by qPCR. Independent samples t-test or paired t-test was used for comparisons between two groups, one-way ANOVA was used for multiple groups, and Tukey’s HSD method was used for multiple comparisons. Results Immunohistochemical analysis revealed that in AE patients, the proportions of CD47 and SIRPα positive cells in CLT were (61.99 ± 3.61)% and (54.06 ± 1.85)%, respectively, which were higher than (57.08 ± 3.38)% and (40.77 ± 1.49)% in DLT (t = 9.434, 58.840; both P < 0.01). Immunofluorescence analysis revealed that the Pearson correlation coefficient between CD47 and SIRPα in CLT was 0.66 ± 0.02, which was higher than that in DLT (0.45 ± 0.01) (t = 7.624, P < 0.01). The results of flow cytometry showed that the median fluorescence intensity of CD47 in macrophages after co-culture for 24 and 48 hours were 8 259.00 ± 66.01 and 9 445.00 ± 41.58, respectively, which were higher than the pre-co-culture value of 5 603.00 ± 193.40 (HSD = 0.691, 0.735; both P < 0.01). The median fluorescence intensity of SIRPα in macrophages after co-culture for 24 and 48 hours were 3 123.00 ± 184.60 and 2 931.00 ± 54.08, respectively, which were higher than the pre-co-culture value of 2 508.00 ± 43.15 (HSD = 0.491, 0.235; both P < 0.01). qPCR analysis revealed that the relative transcription levels of CD47 in macrophages after co-culture for 24 and 48 hours were 1.80 ± 0.02 and 1.64 ± 0.01, respectively, which were higher than the pre-co-culture level of 0.99 ± 0.01 (HSD = 0.098 and 0.125; both P < 0.01). The relative transcription levels of SIRPα in macrophages were 1.00 ± 0.02 before the addition of protoscoleces, 0.52 ± 0.05 and 1.27 ± 0.03 after co-culture for 24 and 48 hours, respectively. The level after 24 hours was lower than that before the addition of protoscoleces (HSD = 0.015, P < 0.01), while the level after 48 hours was higher than that before the addition of protoscoleces (HSD = 0.105, P < 0.01). Immunofluorescence analysis revealed that the Pearson correlation coefficients between CD47 and SIRPα after co-culture for 24 and 48 hours were 0.920 ± 0.001 and 0.990 ± 0.001, respectively, which were higher than the pre-co-culture value of 0.770 ± 0.001 (HSD = 0.091, 0.135; both P < 0.01). Fluorescence analysis revealed that the mean fluorescence intensity of EGFP in the inhibitor-infection group was 8 923.0 ± 49.3, which was higher than that in the infection group (7 537.0 ± 29.3) (HSD = 0.205, P < 0.01). Flow cytometry analysis revealed that the mean fluorescence intensity of EGFP in the inhibitor-infection group was 21.54 ± 0.03, which was higher than that in the infection group (18.55 ± 0.51) (HSD = 0.327, P < 0.01). qPCR analysis revealed that the mRNA relative transcription levels of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) and CD86, the markers of M1 macrophage, were 20.87 ± 0.40 and 40.64 ± 0.75 in the inhibitor-infection group, respectively, which were higher than 5.38 ± 0.11 and 3.79 ± 0.05 in the infection group (HSD = 0.194, 0.261; both P < 0.01). The mRNA relative transcription levels of arginase 1 (Arg1) and CD206, the markers of M2 macrophage, were 48.76 ± 2.22 and 6.33 ± 0.06 in the inhibitor-infection group, respectively, which were lower than 83.28 ± 0.58 and 12.33 ± 0.12 in the infection group (HSD = 0.283, 0.164; both P < 0.01). In the inhibitor-infection group, the mRNA relative transcription levels of interleukin 6 (IL-6), IL-1β and tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α), the M1-type cytokines, were 3 896.00 ± 176.70, 271.30 ± 8.39 and 4.90 ± 0.10, respectively, which were higher than 2 869.00 ± 89.55, 154.90 ± 2.61 and 3.04 ± 0.03 in the infection group (HSD = 0.712, 0.625, 0.693; P < 0.05, 0.01, 0.01). The mRNA relative transcription levels of IL-10 and transforming growth factor β (TGF-β), the M2-type cytokines, in the inhibitor-infection group were 127.40 ± 4.92 and 1.34 ± 0.03, respectively, which were lower than 380.30 ± 8.55 and 1.61 ± 0.02 in the infection group (HSD = 0.324, 0.163; both P < 0.01). Conclusion The expression of CD47 and SIRPα in macrophages were increased after E. multilocularis infection, while the phagocytic function of macrophages was reduced. Specific inhibition of the CD47/SIRPα interaction could improve the phagocytic function and promote macrophage polarization towards the M1 phenotype.

Key words: Echinococcus multilocularis, Immune checkpoint, Phagocytosis, Macrophage polarization

中图分类号: