中国寄生虫学与寄生虫病杂志

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

我国消除疟疾风险评估分析

周晓农1,张少森1,徐俊芳1,2,夏志贵1,王汝波1,钱颖骏1,周水森1,杨维中3   

  1. 1 中国疾病预防控制中心寄生虫病预防控制所,卫生部寄生虫病原与媒介生物学重点实验室,世界卫生组织疟疾、血吸虫病和丝虫病合作中心,上海 200025;2 湖北省民族大学医学院,恩施 445000;3 中国疾病预防控制中心,北京 100010
  • 出版日期:2014-12-30 发布日期:2015-02-12

Risk Assessment for Malaria Elimination in P. R. China

ZHOU Xiao-nong1,ZHANG Shao-sen1,XU Jun-fang1,2,XIA Zhi-gui1,WANG Ru-bo1,QIAN Ying-jun1,ZHOU Shui-sen1,YANG Wei-zhong3   

  1. 1 National Institute of Parasitic Diseases,Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention,Key Laboratory for Parasite and Vector Biology,MOH;WHO Collaborating Center for Malaria,Schistosomiasis and Filariasis,Shanghai 200025,China; 2 Medical College,Hubei University for Nationalitlies,Enshi 445000,China;3 Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention,Beijing 100010,China
  • Online:2014-12-30 Published:2015-02-12

摘要:

目的  明确我国消除疟疾进程中的风险区域,为有效推动全国消除疟疾进程和全面实施消除疟疾策略提供依据。 方法  收集2010年全国24个疟疾流行省以县为单位的数据,包括各流行县的疟疾流行现状、潜在传播风险和机构工作能力等指标,计算疟疾传播风险评估指数和消除疟疾能力评估指数,定量分析各地疟疾传播风险和消除疟疾能力,对我国消除疟疾进程中的风险区域进行分类,并采用ArcGIS软件绘制我国消除疟疾的风险地图。  结果  收集获得2010年全国24个疟疾流行省2 147个流行县有关疟疾传播风险和消除疟疾能力的数据;统计获得各县能力总评估指数与传播风险指数,结果显示约40%的县在平均线以下;根据疟疾传播风险、疾病防治工作能力及疟疾发病率水平之间关系的三维数据分析结果显示,全国2 147个流行县可分为4类,1类流行县(极高度风险县)共20个,主要分布在云南(9个)、广西(5个)和西藏(1个)等8个省(直辖市、自治区); 2类流行县(高风险县)共17个,主要分布在云南(3个)、广西(2个)、贵州(2个)、陕西(2个)和西藏(1个)等12个省(直辖市、自治区);3类风险县(中度风险县)共170个,主要分布在云南(15个)、贵州(14个)、河北(14个)、四川(13个)、山西(10个)等19个省(直辖市、自治区); 4类风险县(低风险县)共1 940个,在24个省(直辖市、自治区)均有分布。  结论  明确了我国消除疟疾的4类风险区域的分布。

关键词: 疟疾, 消除, 风险评估

Abstract:

Objective  To identify the risk area in China during the malaria elimination process, and provide the evidence for promotion of the national malaria elimination programme and implementation of elimination strategy.  Methods  Data collection was conducted in 24 endemic provinces in 2010, including data of transmission capacity, potential risk of malaria transmission and the capacity of health professional team at county level. Quantitative assessment of the malaria transmission risk as well as the capacity of health facilities were conducted based on the calculation of malaria transmission risk index (MTI) and health facilities capacity index (CI). ArcGIS 10.0 was used to develop the risk map based on the outcome of quantitative assessment.  Results  The data of transmission capacity, potential risk of transmission and the capacity of health professional team were collected from 2 147 counties in 24 provinces. Based on MTI and CI calculated for each county, statistic results showed that about 40% of the counties were under the average level of both MTI and CI. The relationship among potential risk of transmission, the capacity of health professional team and malaria incidence were analyzed in three dimensions, and four types were categorized among 2 147 counties. Type Ⅰ(super-high risk area) counties (20) distributed in Yunnan (9), Guangxi (5), Henan (1), Hunan (1), Hebei (1), Sichuan (1), Chongqing (1), and Tibet (1). 17 counties were classified into type Ⅱ(high risk area) area, distributed in Yunnan (3), Guangxi (2), Guizhou (2), Shaanxi (2), Guangdong (1), Jiangxi (1), Hubei(1), Sichuan (1), Gansu (1), Hebei (1), Fujian (1) and Tibet (1). A total of 170 type Ⅲ (moderate risk area) counties distributed in 19 provinces including Yunnan (15), Guizhou (14), Hebei (14), Sichuan (13), Shanxi(10), Guangxi (9), Hunan (9), Anhui (9), Jiangsu (9), Shaanxi (9), Shandong (9), Chongqing (8), Gansu (8), Jiangxi (7), Henan (7), Fujian (6), Guangdong (5), Hubei (5), and Zhejiang (4). 1 940 type Ⅳ (low risk area) counties distributed in 24 provinces.  Conclusion  The distribution of four types of risk area for malaria elimination is identified in China.

Key words: Malaria, Elimination, Risk assessment