中国寄生虫学与寄生虫病杂志 ›› 2018, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (1): 1-14.

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

2012-2016年中国棘球蚴病抽样调查分析

伍卫平1, 王虎2, 王谦3, 周晓农1,*(), 王立英1, 郑灿军4, 曹建平1, 肖宁1, 王莹1, 朱曜宇1, 牛彦麟5, 薛垂召1, 曾祥嫚6, 房琦1, 韩帅1, 余晴1, 杨诗杰1, 付青1, 白雪飞3, 田添1, 李军建7, 张梦媛1, 吴文婷1, 张山山1, 侯岩岩8, 冯宇9, 马宵10, 李斌11, 李凡卡12, 郭卫东13, 杨亚明14, 吴向林15, 金小林16, 张红卫17, 于石成4   

  1. 1 中国疾病预防控制中心寄生虫病预防控制所,世界卫生组织热带病合作中心,科技部国家级热带病国际联合研究中心,卫生部寄生虫病原与媒介生物学重点实验室,上海 200025
    2 青海省卫生和计划生育委员会,西宁 810000
    3 四川省疾病预防控制中心,成都 610041
    4 中国疾病预防控制中心,北京 102206
    5 北京市疾病预防控制中心,北京 100013
    6 宁波市第二医院,宁波 315000
    7 上海市第一人民医院,上海 201620
    8 新疆自治区疾病预防控制中心,乌鲁木齐 830001
    9 甘肃省疾病预防控制中心,兰州 73000
    10青海省地方病预防控制所,西宁 810000
    11 西藏自治区疾病预防控制中心,拉萨 850000
    12 新疆生产建设兵团,乌鲁木齐 830002
    13 内蒙古自治区疾病预防控制中心,呼和浩特 010031
    14 云南省寄生虫病防治研究所,普洱 650022
    15 宁夏自治区疾病预防控制中心,银川 750004
    16 江苏省寄生虫病防治研究所,无锡 214064
    17 河南省疾病预防控制中心,郑州 450016
  • 收稿日期:2018-01-16 出版日期:2018-02-28 发布日期:2018-03-14
  • 通讯作者: 周晓农
  • 基金资助:
    中央转移支付包虫病防治专项和国家科技重大专项(No. 2012ZX10004-220)

A nationwide sampling survey on echinococcosis in China during 2012-2016

Wei-ping WU1, Hu WANG2, Qian WANG3, Xiao-nong ZHOU1,*(), Li-ying WANG1, Can-jun ZHENG4, Jian-ping CAO1, Ning XIAO1, Ying WANG1, Yao-yu ZHU1, Yan-lin NIU5, Chui-zhao XUE1, Xiang-man ZENG6, Qi FANG1, Shuai HAN1, Qing YU1, Shi-jie YANG1, Qing FU1, Xue-fei BAI3, Tian TIAN1, Jun-jian LI7, Meng-yuan ZHANG1, Wen-ting WU1, Shan-shan ZHANG1, Yan-yan HOU8, Yu FENG9, Xiao MA10, Bin LI11, Fan-ka LI12, Wei-dong GUO13, Ya-ming YANG14, Xiang-lin WU15, Xiao-lin JIN16, Hong-wei ZHANG17, Shi-cheng YU4   

  1. 1 National Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention; WHO Collaborating Centre for Tropical Diseases; National Center for International Research on Tropical Diseases, Ministry of Science and Technology; Key Laboratory of Parasite and Vector Biology, Ministry of Health, Shanghai 200025, China
    2 Qinghai Health and Family Planning Commission, Xining 810000, China
    3 Sichuan Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Chengdu 610041, China
    4 Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 102206, China
    5 Beijing Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 100013, China
    6 Ningbo No.2 Hospital, Ningbo 315000, China
    7 Shanghai First People’s Hospital, Shanghai 201620, China;
    8 Xinjiang Autonomous Regional Center for Disease Control and prevention, Urumqi 830001, China
    9 Gansu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Lanzhou 73000, China
    10 Qinghai Provincial Institute of Endemic Disease control, Xining 810000, China
    11 Tibet Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Lhasa 850000, China
    12 Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Urumqi 830002, China
    13 Inner Mongolia Autonomous Regional Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Hohhot 010031, China
    14 Yunnan Provincial Institute for Parasitic Disease Control, Kunming 650022, China
    15 Ningxia Autonomous Regional Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Yinchuan 750004, China
    16 Jiangsu Provincial Institute for Parasitic Disease Control, Wuxi 214064, China
    17 Henan Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Zhengzhou 450016, China
  • Received:2018-01-16 Online:2018-02-28 Published:2018-03-14
  • Contact: Xiao-nong ZHOU
  • Supported by:
    Supported by the Central Government Transferred Special Funds for Echinococcosis Control and National Science and Technology Major Projects (No. 2012ZX10004-220)

摘要:

目的 了解中国棘球蚴病流行范围和程度。方法 2012-2016年,在内蒙古、四川、西藏、甘肃、青海、宁夏、云南、陕西、新疆(包括新疆生产建设兵团)9省(自治区)有疑似棘球蚴病本地感染者和可能存在棘球蚴病传播条件的县(市、师),按照牧业、半农半牧、农业和城镇等4种生产类型的行政村(居委会)占全县人口的比例,确定各层抽样行政村数,随机抽取16个调查村,每村调查200人,对1岁以上常住居民进行超声检查棘球蚴病患病情况,疑似病例辅以血清学检测。在各调查县(市、师)以牧区、半农半牧区、农区和城镇为主的乡(镇)各抽1所完全小学,超声检查儿童棘球蚴病患病情况,并采集血样,用ELISA检测血清抗棘球蚴抗体。在每个调查村抽取20个养犬户,每户采集1条犬的粪样,ELISA检测犬粪棘球绦虫抗原。每县(市、师)选取当地繁育的1齿龄(岁)及以上的羊1 000只或牛500头,采用内脏剖检法检查家畜棘球蚴感染情况。在多房棘球蚴病患者居住地周围捕捉各种啮齿类动物,内脏剖检法检查多房棘球蚴感染情况。另在2000年以来有棘球蚴病病例报告的河南和江苏两省各选2个县(市)病例所在区域进行人群患病情况和中间宿主感染情况调查。根据调查结果、当地存在传播条件和有本地感染病例、周边有棘球蚴病流行区的确定为棘球蚴病流行县。按照分层加权的方法推算居民患病率和患病人数。结果 全国共调查413个县,其中368个县被确定为棘球蚴病流行县,分布于内蒙古、四川、西藏、甘肃、青海、宁夏、云南、陕西和新疆等9省(自治区),其中115个县为细粒棘球蚴病和多房棘球蚴病混合流行,无单纯多房棘球蚴病的流行县(市、师)。在364个流行县(市、师)中,共调查1 001 173人,检出棘球蚴病5 133例,总检出率为0.51%;其中细粒棘球病4 018例(占78.28%)、多房棘球蚴病1 008例(占19.64%)、细粒和多房混合感染病例47例(占0.92%)和未分型60例(占1.17%)。推算流行区人群患病率为0.28%,患病人数为166 098例。364个流行县(市、师)中,属青藏高原的有158个县(占43.41%),人群棘球蚴病检出率为1.28%(4 260/332 884),高于非青藏高原地区的0.13%(873/668 289)(χ2 = 5 752.13,P < 0.05)。西藏自治区人群棘球蚴病检出率和推算患病率均最高,分别为1.71%(1 371/80 384)和1.66%,与其他省(自治区)的检出率比较差异有统计学意义(χ2 = 2 435.70,P < 0.05)。牧区、半农半牧区、农区和城镇等4种生产类型地区的棘球蚴病检出率分别为1.62%(2 901/178 544)、0.50%(1 097/219 829)、0.19%(830/435 672)和0.21%(280/131 745)(χ2 = 5 278.60,P < 0.05)。男性和女性棘球蚴病检出率分别为0.43%(2 047/476 601)和0.59%(3 086/524 522)(χ2 = 123.27,P < 0.05)。不同年龄组中,≥ 90岁年龄组人群棘球蚴病检出率最高,为1.35%(6/443);棘球蚴病检出率随着年龄的增长而升高(χ2趋势 = 247.99,P < 0.05)。不同职业人群中,宗教人士的棘球蚴病检出率最高,为4.42%(79/1 786);不同职业人群的检出率差异有统计学意义(χ2 = 6 138.90,P < 0.05)。不同文化程度人群中,文盲人群的棘球蚴病检出率最高,为1.22%(2 968/242 423);不同文化程度人群棘球蚴病检出率差异有统计学意义(χ2 = 3 381.40,P < 0.05)。共超声检查儿童385 878人,棘球蚴病检出率为0.10%(371/385 878);ELISA检测儿童血样364 770份,抗棘球蚴抗体阳性率为3.03%(11 035/364 770),其中青海省的儿童血清抗体阳性率最高(5.92%,2 693/45 507),与其他省(自治区)的比较差异有统计学意义(χ2 = 1 481.80,P < 0.05)。共采集犬粪样111 832份,检出棘球绦虫抗原阳性4 750份,阳性率为4.25%,其中青海省的犬粪抗原阳性率最高,为13.02%(1 505/11 563),与其他省(自治区)的比较差异有统计学意义(χ2 = 2 435.50,P < 0.05)。在342个流行县开展家畜(羊、牛、猪)棘球蚴感染情况调查,感染总检出率为4.68%(10 186/217 774),其中西藏自治区的家畜感染检出率最高,为13.21%(283/2 143),与其他省(自治区)的比较差异有统计学意义(χ2 = 351.14,P < 0.05);羊感染的检出率为4.84%(8 448/178 946)。在有多房棘球蚴病流行的54个县中,共捕获啮齿目和兔形目动物42 734只,检出多房棘球蚴感染667只,检出率为1.56%;其中西藏自治区(7个县)的检出率最高,为10.34%(12/116),与其他省(自治区)的比较差异有统计学意义(χ2 = 52.82,P < 0.05)。在河南省(济源市和许昌市)ELISA检测人群血样549份(其中成人血样49份),血清抗棘球蚴抗体均为阴性;江苏省(溧阳市和宜兴市)ELISA检测人群血样474份,血清抗棘球蚴抗体阳性率为5.91%(28/474),抗体阳性者超声检查均为阴性。结论 本调查结果和既往资料确定全国棘球蚴病流行县有368个,分布于内蒙古、四川、西藏、甘肃、青海、宁夏、云南、陕西和新疆等9省(自治区),其中115个县为细粒棘球蚴病和多房棘球蚴病混合流行区。西藏、青海和四川等3省(自治区)的人群棘球蚴病检出率较高,青海、西藏、甘肃等3省(自治区)的犬粪棘球绦虫抗原阳性率较高,西藏、青海和新疆等3省(自治区)的家畜棘球蚴感染检出率较高。

关键词: 中国, 棘球蚴病, 细粒棘球蚴病, 多房棘球蚴病, 流行情况

Abstract:

Objective To identify the endemic areas and endemic situation of echinococcosis in China. Methods Nine provinces and autonomous regions(Inner Mongolia, Sichuan, Tibet, Gansu, Qinghai, Ningxia, Yunnan, Shaanxi and Xinjiang (including Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps) were involved in this study during 2012-2016. In counties (cities) with suspected local cases of hydatidosis and suitable conditions for disease transmission, the numbers of administrative villages of pastoral area, semi-agricultural and semi-pastoral area, agricultural area, and town were determined according to their population sizes relative to the whole population size in the county. Sixteen villages were randomly selected, from each of which 200 residents aged > 1 year were examined by ultrasonography, accompanied by serological test for the suspected. In each county (city) surveyed, one primary school was selected from a township that was dominated by the pastoral area, semi-agricultural and semi-pastoral area, agricultural area, and town, respectively. Students in the schools were examined by ultrasonography, and blood taken for serum to detect antibody by ELISA. Twenty households raising dogs were selected from each village, and Echinococcus antigen in dog feces was detected by ELISA for one dog in each household. In each county (city), 1 000 sheep/pigs or 500 cattle raised locally were selected to examine hydatid infection in internal organs. Rodents were captured around the residence of patients with alveolar echinococcosis (AE), visceral biopsy was performed to examine lesions caused by Echinococcus multilocularis and identified by microscope. Two counties were selected In Henan and Jiangsu Provinces, respectively, where indigenous cases of hydatidosis were reported since 2000, a survey was made in human population and livestock. Then counties prevalent with echinococcosis were determined based on the survey results, local conditions for transmission, number of indigenous cases, and the prevalence of hydatidosis in regions nearby. According to the method of stratified weighting, the prevalence and the number of patients were estimated. Results A total of 413 counties were surveyed, of which 368 counties were identified as endemic counties of echinococcosis, distributed in the nine provinces and autonomous regions above. Of which, 115 counties showed mixed prevalence of cystic echinococcosis (CE) and AE. No county showed AE prevalence alone. Among 364 endemic counties, 1 001 173 residents were examined by ultrosound, of whom 5 133 (0.51%) were detected with hydatidosis, comprising 4 018 CE cases (78.28%), 1 008 AE cases (19.64%), 47 cases of mixed CE and AE (0.92%), and 60 unclassified cases (1.17%). The prevalence was estimated to be 0.28% in the whole endemic area, and the number of patients was estimated to be 166 098. Of the 364 endemic counties, 158 (43.41%) were located in Qinghai-Tibetan plateau, with a prevalence of 1.28% (4 260/332 884), higher than that of non-Qinghai-Tibetan plateau areas (0.13%, 873/668 289) (χ2 = 5 752.13, P < 0.05). The prevalence was highest in Tibet Autonomous Region (1.71%, 1 371/80 384), with significant difference comparing with other provinces (autonomous regions) (χ2 = 2 435.70, P < 0.05). The prevalence of hydatidosis in pastoral area, semi-pastoral and semi-agricultural area, agricultural area and town were 1.62% (2 901/178 544), 0.50% (1 097/219 829), 0.19% (830/435 672) and 0.21% (280/131 745), respectively (χ2 = 5 278.60, P < 0.05). The prevalence was higher in males (0.43%, 2 047/476 601) than in females (0.59%, 3 086/524 522) (χ2 = 123.27, P < 0.05). The prevalence increased with age (χ2trend = 247.99, P < 0.05), being highest in those of ≥ 90 years (1.35%, 6/443). There was a significant difference in prevalence among different occupations (χ2 = 6 138.90, P < 0.05), with highest prevalence in the religious (4.42%, 79/1 786). As to the education level, the prevalence was highest in the illiterates (1.22%, 2 968/242 423) and there was a significant difference among education levels (χ2 = 3 381.40, P < 0.05). A total of 385 878 children were examined by ultrasonography, and the prevalence was 0.10% (371/385 878). ELISA was performed in 364 770 blood samples, with an antibody positive rate of 3.03% (11 035/364 770). The positive rate was highest among children in Qinghai (5.92%, 2 693/45 507), with significant difference comparing with other provinces (autonomous regions) (χ2 = 1 481.80, P < 0.05). A total of 111 832 samples of dog feces were collected, and 4 750 were positive for Echinococcus antigen, with a positive rate of 4.25%. The positive rate of Echinococcus antigen was highest in Qinghai Province (13.02%, 1 505/11 563), with significant difference comparing with other provinces (autonomous regions) (χ2 = 2 435.50, P < 0.05). Investigation of hydatid infection in livestock (sheep, cattle and pigs) in 342 endemic counties showed a prevalence of 4.68% (10 186/217 774), among which the infection rate in livestock was highest in Tibet Autonomous Region (13.21%, 283/2 143), with significant difference comparing with other provinces (autonomous regions) (χ2 = 351.14, P < 0.05). The prevalence in sheep was 4.84% (8 448/178 946). A total of 42 734 rodents were captured in 54 counties with endemic AE, and 667 (1.56%) rodents were detected with AE. The AE prevalence was highest in the Tibet Autonomous Region (7 counties) (10.34%, 12/116), with significant difference comparing with other provinces (autonomous regions) (χ2 = 52.82, P < 0.05). In Henan Province (Jiyuan City and Xuchang City), ELISA was performed on 549 blood samples (including 49 blood samples from adults), and all showed negative. Among 474 blood samples tested by ELISA in Jiangsu Province (Liyang City and Yixing City), the positive rate of anti-Echinococcus antibody was 5.91% (28/474), and those sero-positives all showed negative results in ultralsonography. Conclusions Combining the results of this survey and previous data, there are 368 endemic counties of echinococcosis in the 9 provinces (autonomous regions), of which 115 counties showed a mixed prevalence of CE and AE. The prevalence of hydatidosis in populations is higher in Tibet, Qinghai and Sichuan, and the prevalence in livestock was higher in Tibet, Qinghai and Xinjiang. And the positive rate of echinococcus antigen in dog feces was higher in Qinghai, Tibet and Gansu.

Key words: China, Echinococcosis, Cystic echinococcosis, Alveolar echinococcosis, Prevalence

中图分类号: