研究简报

2018—2020年贵州省中华按蚊抗药性调查研究

  • 师伟芳 ,
  • 田珍灶 ,
  • 周敬祝 ,
  • 黄学平 ,
  • 周雪梅 ,
  • 吴国艳 ,
  • 李琼 ,
  • 廖启浪 ,
  • 王丹
展开
  • 1.贵州省疾病预防控制中心,贵阳 550004
    2.荔波县疾病预防控制中心,贵州荔波 558400
    3.从江县疾病预防控制中心,贵州从江 557400
    4.播州区疾病预防控制中心,贵州播州 563100
师伟芳(1987-),女,博士,副主任技师,从事寄生虫病及病媒生物控制工作。E-mail:swf1102@163.com
* 王丹(1986-),女,硕士,主管技师,从事病媒生物控制工作。E-mail:danwang6636@163.com

收稿日期: 2022-05-09

  修回日期: 2022-10-10

  网络出版日期: 2023-02-25

Investigation on the insecticide resistance of Anopheles sinensis in Guizhou Province from 2018 to 2020

  • SHI Weifang ,
  • TIAN Zhenzao ,
  • ZHOU Jingzhu ,
  • HUANG Xueping ,
  • ZHOU Xuemei ,
  • WU Guoyan ,
  • LI Qiong ,
  • LIAO Qilang ,
  • WANG Dan
Expand
  • 1. Guizhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Guiyang 550004, China
    2. Libo Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Libo 558400, Guizhou, China
    3. Congjiang Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Congjiang 557400, Guizhou, China
    4. Bozhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Bozhou 563100, Guizhou, China

Received date: 2022-05-09

  Revised date: 2022-10-10

  Online published: 2023-02-25

摘要

为了解目前贵州省中华按蚊对常见杀虫剂的抗药性水平,本研究选择贵州省从江县、播州区和荔波县为调查点,分别于2018、2019及2020年8月捕捉中华按蚊成蚊,根据WHO推荐使用的药膜接触筒法测定受试蚊对4% DDT、0.05%溴氰菊酯、5%马拉硫磷的敏感性,确定抗性级别,采用χ2检验比较60 min击倒率及校正死亡率的差异。从江、播州和荔波受试蚊均对0.05%溴氰菊酯首只击倒时间最长,分别为8.63、17.52、14.87 min,对4% DDT分别为6.33、2.95、11.88 min,对5%马拉硫磷分别为7.95、2.15、9.80 min。从江、播州和荔波受试蚊接触5%马拉硫磷药膜60 min后击倒率最高,分别为83.9%、39.0%、59.0%,3县(区)间差异有统计学意义(χ2 = 53.98,P < 0.05);接触4% DDT药膜60 min后击倒率分别为61.9%、33.3%、36.2%,接触0.05%溴氰菊酯药膜分别为20.0%、34.2%、11.3%。从江、播州和荔波受试蚊接触4% DDT后的半数击倒时间(KT50)分别为51.29、127.65 、80.05 min,接触0.05%溴氰菊酯的KT50分别为208.27、74.69、420.14 min,接触5%马拉硫磷的KT50分别为29.33、75.60、42.19 min。从江、播州和荔波受试蚊接触5%马拉硫磷后的校正死亡率分别为90.1%、95.0%、95.9%,均为初步抗性群体(M),地区间差异无统计学意义(χ2 = 4.64,P > 0.05);接触4% DDT后的校正死亡率分别为65.6%、38.6% 、55.0%,接触0.05%溴氰菊酯分别为35.2%、35.2%、10.4%,均为抗性群体(R)。贵州省从江县、播州区和荔波县中华按蚊对溴氰菊酯产生了非常强的抗药性,对DDT和马拉硫磷的抗药性水平分别处于抗性水平和初步抗性水平。

本文引用格式

师伟芳 , 田珍灶 , 周敬祝 , 黄学平 , 周雪梅 , 吴国艳 , 李琼 , 廖启浪 , 王丹 . 2018—2020年贵州省中华按蚊抗药性调查研究[J]. 中国寄生虫学与寄生虫病杂志, 2023 , 41(1) : 108 -111 . DOI: 10.12140/j.issn.1000-7423.2023.01.017

Abstract

To determine the insecticide resistance of Anopheles sinensis in Guizhou Province, A. sinensis was captured from the fields of Congjiang County, Bozhou District and Libo County of Guizhou in August 2018 to 2020. The mosquitoes were tested by the filter paper contact method, which is recommended by WHO. The susceptibility and insecticide resistance level of the captured mosquitoes to the diagnostic dose of 4% DDT, 0.05% deltamethrin and 5% malathion were evaluated. A Chi-square test was used to compare the knockdown rates after 60 min exposure and the corrected mortality rate between different study sites. After 60 min exposure, the knockdown time of the first mosquito to 0.05% deltamethrin was the longest in all study area, which takes 8.63 min, 17.52 min and 14.87 min in Congjiang, Bozhou and Libo; for 4% DDT, the knockdown time of the first mosquito was 6.33 min, 2.95 min and 11.88 min; for 5% malathion, the knockdown time of the first mosquito was 7.95 min, 2.15 min and 9.80 min, respectively. In Congjiang, Bozhou and Libo, after exposed for 60 min, the knockdown rates of tested mosquitoes to 5% malathion was the highest in all study areas, which were 83.9%, 39.0%, 59.0% respectively and there were significant differences in the knockdown rates among the three study areas (χ2 = 53.98, P < 0.05). For 4% DDT, the knockdown rates were 61.9%, 33.3% and 36.2%; for 0.05% deltamethrin, the knockdown rates were 20.0%, 34.2%, 11.3%, respectively. The knockdown rates for 50% (KT50) of tested mosquitoes in Congjiang, Bozhou, Libo for 4% DDT were 51.29 min, 127.65 min and 80.05 min; for 0.05% deltamethrin were 208.27 min, 74.69 min and 420.14 min; for 5% malathion were 29.33 min, 75.60 min and 42.19 min, respectively. The adjusted mortality rates of tested mosquitoes in Congjiang, Bozhou, Libo for 5% malathion were 90.1%, 95.0% and 95.9% respectively, which suggested the existence of resistance. There were no significant differences among the three study areas (χ2 = 4.64,P > 0.05). For 4% DDT, the mortality rates were 65.6%, 38.6% and 55.0%; for 0.05% deltamethrin, the mortalityrates were 35.2%, 35.2% and 10.4%, respectively, which suggested that all tested mosquitoes had developed high level of resistance. This study suggested that An. sinensis in Guizhou Province have developed high level of resistance to deltamethrin, and maintained resistance to DDT and may have possible resistance to malathion.

参考文献

[1] Guizhou Local Chronicles Compilation Committee. Guizhou annals local chronicles[M]. Guiyang: Guizhou People’s Publishing House, 2012: 722-762. (in Chinese)
  (贵州省地方志编纂委员会. 贵州省志?地方志[M]. 贵阳: 贵州人民出版社, 2012: 722-762.)
[2] Wang XL, Zhang SM, Zeng FX, et al. Analysis of malaria transmission potential of different vectors in Guizhou Province[J]. Guizhon Med J, 1997, 21(6): 374-376. (in Chinese)
  (王小力, 张思淼, 曾凤秀, 等. 贵州省不同媒介疟疾传播潜势分析[J]. 贵州医药, 1997, 21(6): 374-376.)
[3] Feng J, Zhang L, Xia ZG, et al. Malaria elimination in China: an eminent milestone in the anti-malaria campaign and challenges in the post-elimination stage[J]. Chin J Parasitol Parasit Dis, 2021, 39(4): 421-428. (in Chinese)
  (丰俊, 张丽, 夏志贵, 等. 中国消除疟疾: 重要里程碑意义及消除后的挑战[J]. 中国寄生虫学与寄生虫病杂志, 2021, 39(4): 421-428.)
[4] Ding X, Shi WF, Zhang YQ, et al. Surveillance of malaria vector Anopheles in Guizhou Province from 2005 to 2019[J]. Chin J Schisto Control, 2021, 33(3): 274-280. (in Chinese)
  (丁旭, 师伟芳, 张玉琼, 等. 2005—2019年贵州省传疟媒介按蚊密度及种群监测[J]. 中国血吸虫病防治杂志, 2021, 33(3): 274-280.)
[5] World Health Organization. Test procedures for insecticide resistance monitoring in malaria vector mosquitoes[M]. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2012: 1-30.
[6] Ministry of Health of the People’s Republic of China. Test methods of mosquito resistance to insecticides—Bioassay methods: GB/T 26347—2010[S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2011. (in Chinese)
  (中华人民共和国卫生部. 蚊虫抗药性检测方法生物测定法: GB/T 26347—2010[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2011.)
[7] Zhang SM, Zheng HJ, Cao KQ, et al. An epidemiological survey on toxoplasmosis in 16 provinces of China[J]. J Pract Parasit Dis, 1994(3): 37-38. (in Chinese)
  (张思淼, 郑惠君, 曹可钦, 等. 贵州省疟疾及丝虫病主要传播媒介概况[J]. 实用寄生虫病杂志, 1994(3): 37-38.)
[8] Xiong MH, Zou YD, Xu LN. Comparative study on the resistance of Anopheles sinensis to five insecticides in Libo County, Guizhou Province[J]. Chin J Vector Biol Control, 1997, 8(2): 161. (in Chinese)
  (熊美华, 邹亚丁, 徐丽娜. 贵州荔波县中华按蚊对5种杀虫剂抗药性的比较研究[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 1997, 8(2): 161.)
[9] Yang MQ, Zou YD, Xiong MH, et al. Susceptibility of Anopheles sinensis to deltamethrin and malathion in Tangtou, Sinan County, Guizhou Province[J]. Guizhou Med J, 1994, 18(2): 124-125. (in Chinese)
  (杨明奇, 邹亚丁, 熊美华, 等. 贵州省思南县塘头地区中华按蚊对溴氰菊酯和马拉硫磷的敏感性调查[J]. 贵州医药, 1994, 18(2): 124-125.)
[10] Zou YD, Xu LN, Xiong MH, et al. Toxicity determination of deltamethrin to Anopheles sinensis in Sinan[J]. Hubei J Prev Med, 1998, 9(suppl): 160. (in Chinese)
  (邹亚丁, 徐莉娜, 熊美华, 等. 溴氰菊酯对思南县中华按蚊的毒效测定[J]. 湖北预防医学杂志, 1998, 9(增刊): 160.)
[11] Li JL, Zhou HY, Cao J, et al. Sensitivity of Anopheles sinensis to insecticides in Jiangsu Province[J]. Chin J Schisto Control, 2011, 23(3): 296-300. (in Chinese)
  (李菊林, 周华云, 曹俊, 等. 江苏省疟疾媒介中华按蚊对杀虫剂的敏感性[J]. 中国血吸虫病防治杂志, 2011, 23(3): 296-300.)
[12] Liu Y, Chen JS, Zhou RM, et al. Investigation on the sensitivity of Anopheles sinensis to insecticide[J]. Chin J Parasitol Parasit Dis, 2012, 30(4): 309-311. (in Chinese)
  (刘颖, 陈建设, 周瑞敏, 等. 中华按蚊对杀虫剂敏感性调查[J]. 中国寄生虫学与寄生虫病杂志, 2012, 30(4): 309-311.)
[13] Li Z, Ding J, Wang CY, et al. Investigation of resistance of malaria vector Anopheles to five insecticides in some areas of Liaoning Province, China[J]. Chin J Vector Biol Control, 2013, 24(5): 464-466. (in Chinese)
  (李志, 丁俊, 王纯玉, 等. 辽宁省部分地区传疟媒介按蚊对5种杀虫剂的抗药性调查[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2013, 24(5): 464-466.)
[14] Dai YH, Cheng P, Liu LJ, et al. Detection investigation of Anopheles sinensis resistance to four commonly used insecticides in selected areas of Shandong Province, China[J]. Chin J Vector Biol Control, 2014, 25(3): 219-221. (in Chinese)
  (代玉华, 程鹏, 刘丽娟, 等. 山东省部分地区中华按蚊的抗药性监测[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2014, 25(3): 219-221.)
[15] Yang ML, Li YM, Li KL, et al. Susceptibility of five anopheles species to deltamethrin and DDT and knockdown resistance mutation detection in Hainan Island, China[J]. Acta Parasitol Med Entomol Sin, 2019, 26(2): 99-104. (in Chinese)
  (杨明磊, 李逸明, 李凯利, 等. 海南岛5种按蚊种群对溴氰菊酯和DDT的敏感性测定及击倒抗性突变检测研究[J]. 寄生虫与医学昆虫学报, 2019, 26(2): 99-104.)
[16] Fan MQ, Zhou YB, Liu Y, et al. Resistances of wild Anopheles sinensis adult populations to five insecticides in Shanghai and Daoxian County of Hunan Province[J]. Chin J Vector Biol Control, 2015, 26(3): 242-248. (in Chinese)
  (范明秋, 周毅彬, 刘曜, 等. 上海市和湖南省永州市中华按蚊成蚊对杀虫剂的抗药性比较研究[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2015, 26(3): 242-248.)
[17] Hu YB, He ZQ, Liu Y, et al. Susceptibility of Anopheles sinensis to insecticides in Puyang City, Henan Province[J]. Chin J Schisto Control, 2021, 33(5): 501-504, 509. (in Chinese)
  (胡亚博, 贺志权, 刘颖, 等. 河南省濮阳市中华按蚊对杀虫剂敏感性调查[J]. 中国血吸虫病防治杂志, 2021, 33(5): 501-504, 509.)
[18] Lin ZR, Lin YK, Guo XR, et al. Resistance of Anopheles sinensis to five insecticides in China-Myanmar border areas in Yingjiang County, Yunnan Province, China[J]. Chin J Vector Biol Control, 2022, 33(3): 430-433. (in Chinese)
  (林祖锐, 蔺应坤, 郭祥瑞, 等. 云南省盈江县中缅边境地区中华按蚊对5种杀虫剂的抗药性调查[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2022, 33(3): 430-433.)
[19] Zhou GR, Zeng L, Lan ZY, et al. Analysis on the epidemic situation of imported malaria in Guizhou Province from 2014 to 2018[J]. Parasit Infect Dis, 2019, 17(4): 222-225, 232. (in Chinese)
  (周光荣, 曾乐, 兰子尧, 等. 2014—2018年贵州省输入性疟疾疫情分析[J]. 寄生虫病与感染性疾病, 2019, 17(4): 222-225, 232.)
[20] Liu QY, Liu XB. Anopheles vector control strategy and technology for eliminating the malaria in China[J]. Chin J Vector Biol Control, 2021, 32(5): 513-518. (in Chinese)
  (刘起勇, 刘小波. 中国消除疟疾媒介按蚊控制策略和技术[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2021, 32(5): 513-518.)
文章导航

/

〈 〉