了解全国省级疾病预防控制中心（简称疾控中心）及寄生虫病防治机构的寄生虫病防治专业人员对全球卫生培训的需求、参与培训班的效果评价及建议,为进一步完善全球卫生培训设计提供借鉴。以全国30个省（直辖市、自治区,不含西藏）疾控中心及7个省级寄生虫病防治机构（云南、安徽、江苏、江西、湖北、湖南、山东）参加过中国疾控中心和中国疾控中心寄生虫病预防控制所全球卫生培训的132名人员作为调查对象。通过问卷收集性别、年龄、职称和单位类别,参加全球卫生培训的意愿及最主要原因,参加援外工作的短板以及希望学习的内容,参与培训班的效果评价及建议等信息。共有119名人员完成了调查问卷,应答率为90.2%（119/132）。愿意参加全球卫生培训的人员占比为73.9%（88/119）,仅16.8%（20/119）的受访者所在单位举办过全球卫生培训。愿意参加援外工作和实际参加过援外工作的人员占比分别为95.8%（114/119）和9.2%（11/119）。46.2%（55/119）的受访者参加全球卫生培训的最主要原因是为了提升业务和沟通交流能力。受访者认为参加援外工作最大的短板是个人经验不足（40.3%,48/119）。66.4%（71/107）的受访者认为参加的全球卫生培训整体效果非常好。各省级疾控中心及寄生虫病防治机构专业人员参加全球卫生培训的需求强烈,前期培训的效果良好,后续培训时间和内容可进一步完善。

This study was performed to understand the needs of global health trainings for professionals in provincial centers for disease control and prevention (CDC) and institutions for parasitic disease prevention and control, and evaluate the efficacy of training courses with suggestions, to provide reference for further improving the design of global health training. A total of 132 participants joined the global health training held by Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (China CDC) and the National Institute Parasitic Diseases of China CDC were surveyed. They were from 30 provincial CDCs (or CDCs at levels of municipality and autonomous regions excluding Tibet) and 7 provincial (Yunnan, Anhui, Jiangsu, Jiangxi, Hubei, Hunan and Shandong) parasitic disease control and prevention institutions. Questionnaires containing information on gender, age, positional title, institution category, the intention and main reasons to attend global health training, gaps on foreign aid work, content of training, and efficacy evaluations and suggestions for training courses. A total of 119 respondents completed the questionnaire, with a response rate of 90.2% (119/132). Of the 119 respondents 73.9% (88/119) showed willingness to attend global health training, and only 16.8% (20/119) of the respondents answered that their institutions or centers had held global health training. The proportions of those willing to participate in foreign aid work and those who had participated in foreign aid work were 95.8% (114/119) and 9.2% (11/119), respectively. In addition, 46.2% (55/119) of the respondents regarded improvement of professional competence and communication skills as the most pressing reasons for attending global health training. The most important gap for foreign aid work, according to the respondents (40.3%, 48/119), was the insufficiency of experience. Further, 66.4% (71/107) of the respondents were satisfied with the overall efficacy of global health training. There is a strong need to participate in global health trainings among professionals in provincial CDCs and institutions. The effectiveness of the previous training courses is quite well. Improvements in training time and content are expected for future training courses.