中国寄生虫学与寄生虫病杂志 ›› 2008, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (3): 11-209.

• 现场研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

晚期血吸虫病社会负担评价指标的研究

邓瑶1,周晓农1 *,贾铁武1,王显红1,杨坤1,2,吴晓华1,李石柱1
  

  1. 1 中国疾病预防控制中心寄生虫病预防控制所,世界卫生组织疟疾、血吸虫病和丝虫病合作中心,上海 200025;2 江苏省血吸虫病防治研究所,无锡 214064
  • 收稿日期:1900-01-01 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2008-06-30 发布日期:2008-06-30

Evaluation Indices of Social Burden Caused by Advanced Schistosomiasis

DENG Yao1,ZHOU Xiao-nong1 *,JIA Tie-wu1,WANG Xian-hong1,YANG Kun1,2,WU Xiao-hua1,LI Shi-zhu1
  

  1. 1 National Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, WHO Coll-aborating Centre for Malaria, Schistosomiasis and Filariasia, Shanghai 200025, China; 2 Jiangsu Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Wuxi 214064, China
  • Received:1900-01-01 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2008-06-30 Published:2008-06-30

摘要: 目的 研究我国晚期血吸虫病社会负担评价指标,并确定其权重,为血吸虫病现场防治工作提供科学依据。 方法 通过文献资料确定晚期血吸虫病社会负担评价的一级指标;召开头脑风暴专家会议初步确定其二级指标;经第1轮专家咨询法对上述二级指标进行筛选,并对一级指标的重要性进行排序;通过第2、3轮专家咨询法得到各个二级指标的权重值。 结果 晚期血吸虫病社会负担评价指标体系由4个一级指标及16个二级指标构成。4个一级指标按其重要性排序依次为社会经济、政府形象、大众心理、社会安定。“社会经济”中“中央及地方政府投入的血防经费”的权重系数最大,为14.063;“政府形象”中“对患者的公平性即是否一视同仁”的权重系数最小,为3.125。 结论 本研究对晚期血吸虫病社会负担的各层面及其重要性进行了研究,确立了晚期血吸虫病社会负担评价指标体系。

关键词: 晚期血吸虫病, 头脑风暴法, 专家咨询法, 社会负担, 评价指标

Abstract: Objective To study the evaluation indices and their weights of social burden caused by advanced schistosomiasis so as to provide scientific basis for control of the disease. Methods Primary indices of social burden evaluation for advanced schistosomiasis were summarized based on literature review. Secondary indices were put forward by a brainstorming process of experts. After the first round Delphi method, the secondary indices that needed were chosen, and the importance of primary indices was prioritized. Through the second and third round Delphi method, the weight of each secondary index was obtained. Results Four primary indices and 16 secondary indices consisted the index system of social burden induced by the disease. According to the significance, the 4 primary indices were arranged as social economy, government image, public psychology and social security. The weight of “funding for schistosomiasis control from central and local governments” in “social economic” stood the largest (14.063), while that of “equity to patients” in “government image”, the smallest (3.125). Conclusion The study covers all major aspects and their significance in social burden of advanced schistosomiasis, and an evaluation index system has been established for field validation.

Key words: Advanced schistosomiasis, Brainstorming, Delphi method, Social burden, Evaluation index