旦增曲珍负责数据收集、分析和论文撰写,边巴卓玛、次多杰、索朗拉姆、索郎旺杰、康珠益西负责现场调查、数据收集,拉巴桑珠负责项目设计指导,贡桑曲珍负责项目设计、技术指导、现场协调。
收稿日期: 2025-12-21
修回日期: 2026-01-30
网络出版日期: 2026-04-15
基金资助
西藏自治区自然科学基金(XZ202501ZR0053);西藏大学2025年研究生“高水平人才培养计划”(2025-GSP-S152)
Factors affecting human alveolar echinococcosis in Baqing County, Xizang Autonomous Region: a case control study
Received date: 2025-12-21
Revised date: 2026-01-30
Online published: 2026-04-15
Supported by
Natural Science Foundation of Xizang Autonomous Region(XZ202501ZR0053);2025 Postgraduate “High-Level Talent Training Program” of Xizang University(2025-GSP-S152)
目的 探讨西藏自治区巴青县人群多房棘球蚴病(AE)的主要影响因素,为牧区棘球蚴病防控提供科学依据。方法 基于2023年1月—2024年10月在西藏自治区巴青县开展的人群棘球蚴病筛查,以经腹部B超检查并依据WS 257—2006《包虫病诊断标准》确诊的AE患者为病例组,同期筛查排除棘球蚴病的居民为对照组,按性别相同、年龄相近(± 5岁)、居住于同一或地理相邻行政村的匹配原则,采用1∶2匹配病例,每个匹配集包含1例病例和2名对照。于2024年9月—2025年5月由统一培训的调查员进行面对面问卷调查。问卷内容包括一般人口学特征、犬只饲养与管理情况、环境暴露因素、个人行为习惯等。采用R软件进行统计学分析,组间比较采用χ2检验;AE患病影响因素采用条件logistic回归分析。结果 共调查258人,其中病例组86人,对照组172人,均为藏族。病例组平均年龄为(44.6 ± 14.2)岁,对照组为(44.1 ± 14.1)岁,两组差异无统计学意义(t = 0.26,P > 0.05)。病例组与对照组在性别、职业、教育水平、身体质量指数值、婚姻状况、家庭常住人口等方面差异均无统计学意义(χ2 = 0.00、1.53、0.83、4.09、0.71、0.53,均P > 0.05)。单因素条件logistic回归分析结果显示,养犬[OR = 2.82,95%置信区间(CI):1.45~5.48]、犬只从不驱虫(OR = 3.22,95% CI:1.09~9.48)、犬粪不规范处理(OR = 4.86,95% CI:2.09~11.30)、经常与犬接触(OR = 2.98,95% CI:1.42~6.24)、家周围有狐狸(OR = 2.42,95% CI:1.37~4.27)、主要饮用江河水(OR = 2.55,95% CI:1.26~5.16)、饮用生水(OR = 2.02,95% CI:1.17~3.48)以及经常食用未清洗新鲜虫草(OR = 3.87,95% CI:1.55~9.67)与AE患病风险相关(均P < 0.05)。多因素条件logistic回归分析结果显示,养犬时间 > 5年(OR = 4.68,95% CI:1.09~20.17)、犬粪不做处理(OR = 9.35,95% CI:2.39~36.64)、与犬经常接触(OR = 6.92,95% CI:1.21~39.51)及饮用水来源为江河湖泊沟塘水(OR = 4.97,95% CI:1.07~23.20)等4个因素是AE患病的主要危险因素。结论 巴青县人群AE的发生与犬源管理及饮水安全密切相关,应加强犬只管理和犬粪规范处理、改善饮水卫生条件并强化牧民健康教育。
旦增曲珍 , 边巴卓玛 , 次多杰 , 索朗拉姆 , 索郎旺杰 , 康珠益西 , 拉巴桑珠 , 贡桑曲珍 . 西藏自治区巴青县人群多房棘球蚴病影响因素分析:病例对照研究[J]. 中国寄生虫学与寄生虫病杂志, 2026 , 44(2) : 284 -289 . DOI: 10.12140/j.issn.1000-7423.2026.02.020
Objective To identify the main influencing factors of human alveolar echinococcosis (AE) in Baqing County, Xizang Autonomous Region, so as to provide insights into echinococcosis control in pastoral areas. Methods Based on the human echinococcosis screening programme in Baqing County, Xizang Autonomous Region from January 2023 to October 2024, AE patients that were definitively diagnosed with abdominal B‑mode ultrasonography and based on WS 257-2006 Diagnostic Criteria for Echinococcosis were selected as the case group, and residents that were free of echinococcosis as revealed by abdominal B-mode ultrasonography during the same time served as controls. Matching was performed based on the same gender, similar age (± 5 years), and residence in the same or geographically adjacent administrative villages, with one case matched to two controls. From September 2024 to May 2025, a face to face questionnaire survey was conducted by uniformly trained investigators, and the questionnaire covered general demographics, dog breeding and management, environmental exposure factors, and personal behavioral habits. All statistical analyses were performed using the software R, with chi square test used for between group comparisons, and a conditional logistic regression model for identifying factors affecting the risk of AE. Results A total of 258 residents from Baqing County were enrolled, including 86 cases in the case groups and 172 matched controls, and all subjects were Tibetan residents. The mean age was (44.6 ± 14.2) years in the case group and (44.1 ± 14.1) years in the control group, with no statistically significant difference (t = 0.26, P > 0.05), and no significant differences were observed in gender, occupation, educational level, body mass index, marital status, or household size (χ2 = 0.00, 1.53, 0.83, 4.09, 0.71 and 0.53, all P > 0.05). Univariate conditional logistic regression analysis identified significant associations of dog breeding (OR = 2.82, 95% CI: 1.45-5.48), never deworming for dogs (OR = 3.22, 95% CI: 1.09-9.48), improper disposal of dog feces (OR = 4.86, 95% CI: 2.09-11.30), frequent contact with dogs (OR = 2.98, 95% CI: 1.42-6.24), presence of foxes around the residence (OR = 2.42, 95% CI: 1.37-4.27), use of river/stream water as the main drinking water source (OR = 2.55, 95% CI: 1.26-5.16), drinking unboiled water (OR = 2.02, 95% CI: 1.17-3.48), and frequent consumption of unwashed fresh Cordyceps (OR = 3.87, 95% CI: 1.55-9.67) with the risk of AE (all P < 0.05), and multivariate analysis identified dog breeding duration for > 5 years (OR = 4.68, 95% CI: 1.09-20.17), non disposal of dog feces (OR = 9.35, 95% CI: 2.39-36.64), frequent contact with dogs (OR = 6.92, 95% CI: 1.21-39.51), and drinking water sourced from rivers, lakes, ditches, or ponds (OR = 4.97, 95% CI: 1.07-23.20) as main risk factors for AE. Conclusion The development of human AE is closely associated with dog management and drinking water safety in Baqing County. It is recommended to reinforce dog management and standardized disposal of dog feces, improve drinking water sanitation, and enhance health education among herders.
| [1] | World Health Organization. Echinococcosis: key facts[EB/OL]. (2021-05-17)[2025-11-02]. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/echinococcosis. |
| [2] | Romig T, Deplazes P, Jenkins D, et al. Ecology and life cycle patterns of Echinococcus species[J]. Adv Parasitol, 2017, 95: 213-314. |
| [3] | Kakamad FH, Anwar KA, Ahmed HK, et al. Risk factors associated with human echinococcosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Front Vet Sci, 2024, 11: 1480579. |
| [4] | Jensenius M, M?rch K, Yaqub S, et al. Alveolar echinococcosis[J]. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 2024, 144(10): 815-821. |
| [5] | Yang N, Ma WM, Ke Y, et al. Transplantation of adipose-derived stem cells ameliorates Echinococcus multilocularis-induced liver fibrosis in mice[J]. PLoS Negl Trop Dis, 2022, 16(1): e0010175. |
| [6] | Wen H, Vuitton L, Tuxun T, et al. Echinococcosis: advances in the 21st century[J]. Clin Microbiol Rev, 2019, 32(2): e00075-e00018. |
| [7] | Deplazes P, Rinaldi L, Alvarez Rojas CA, et al. Global distribution of alveolar and cystic echinococcosis[J]. Adv Parasitol, 2017, 95: 315-493. |
| [8] | Ma T, Wang Q, Hao MM, et al. Epidemiological characteristics and risk factors for cystic and alveolar echinococcosis in China: an analysis of a national population-based field survey[J]. Parasit Vectors, 2023, 16(1): 181. |
| [9] | 贡桑曲珍, 王立英, 牛彦麟, 等. 西藏自治区人群棘球蚴病空间分布特征分析[J]. 中国病原生物学杂志, 2018, 13(1): 64-67. |
| Gong S, Wang LY, Niu YL, et al. Analysis of the characteristics of the spatial distribution of human echinococciasis in the Tibet Autonomous Region[J]. J Parasit Biol, 2018, 13(1): 64-67. (in Chinese) | |
| [10] | 刘白雪, 蒉嫣, 薛垂召, 等. 2023年全国棘球蚴病防治工作进展[J]. 中国寄生虫学与寄生虫病杂志, 2025, 43(1): 6-13. |
| Liu BX, Kui Y, Xue CZ, et al. Progress of the national echinococcosis control programme in China, 2023[J]. Chin J Parasitol Parasit Dis, 2025, 43(1): 6-13. (in Chinese) | |
| [11] | Ma T, Jiang D, Hao MM, et al. Geographical detector-based influence factors analysis for echinococcosis prevalence in Tibet, China[J]. PLoS Negl Trop Dis, 2021, 15(7): e0009547. |
| [12] | Wang LY, Wang ZY, Qin M, et al. A regressive analysis of the main environmental risk factors of human echinococcosis in 370 counties in China[J]. PLoS Negl Trop Dis, 2024, 18(5): e0012131. |
| [13] | 杨峰. 羊棘球蚴病的诊断与防治[J]. 中国畜牧业, 2024(21): 105-106. |
| Yang F. Diagnosis and control of sheep echinococcosis[J]. China Anim Ind, 2024(21): 105-106. (in Chinese) | |
| [14] | 刘白雪, 蒉嫣, 薛垂召, 等. 2024年全国棘球蚴病防治工作进展[J]. 中国寄生虫学与寄生虫病杂志, 2025, 43(5): 739-748. |
| Liu BX, Kui Y, Xue CZ, et al. Progress of the national echinococcosis control programme in 2024[J]. Chin J Parasitol Parasit Dis, 2025, 43(5): 739-748. (in Chinese) | |
| [15] | 艾佳佳, 季笑遥, 白玛央金, 等. 2019―2023年西藏自治区人类囊型棘球蚴病流行特征及影响因素[J]. 中华疾病控制杂志, 2025, 29(5): 600-605. |
| Ai JJ, Ji XY, B M, et al. Epidemiological characteristics and influencing factors of human cystic echinococcosis in Tibet Autonomous Region, 2019-2023[J]. Chin J Dis Control Prev, 2025, 29(5): 600-605. (in Chinese) | |
| [16] | 马冰村, 刘玉英, 张甜甜, 等. 青海省棘球蚴病影响因素的病例对照研究[J]. 中国寄生虫学与寄生虫病杂志, 2023, 41(2): 183-191. |
| Ma BC, Liu YY, Zhang TT, et al. A case-control study on the influencing factors of echinococcosis in Qinghai Province[J]. Chin J Parasitol Parasit Dis, 2023, 41(2): 183-191. (in Chinese) | |
| [17] | 何伟, 王谦, 黄燕, 等. 四川省石渠县人群细粒棘球蚴病影响因素的病例对照研究[J]. 中国血吸虫病防治杂志, 2019, 31(5): 486-490. |
| He W, Wang Q, Huang Y, et al. Risk factors of human cystic echinococcosis in Shiqu County, Sichuan Province: a case-control study[J]. Chin J Schisto Control, 2019, 31(5): 486-490. (in Chinese) | |
| [18] | Moss JE, Chen X, Li T, et al. Reinfection studies of canine echinococcosis and role of dogs in transmission of Echinococcus multilocularis in Tibetan communities, Sichuan, China[J]. Parasitology, 2013, 140(13): 1685-1692. |
| [19] | Wang X, Zuo QQ, Xue CZ, et al. Niche analysis of spatial distribution and host selection of global Echinococcus species-worldwide, up to June 30, 2024[J]. China CDC Wkly, 2025, 7(26): 889-894. |
| [20] | Conraths FJ, Probst C, Possenti A, et al. Potential risk factors associated with human alveolar echinococcosis: systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. PLoS Negl Trop Dis, 2017, 11(7): e0005801. |
| [21] | Weng XD, Mu ZQ, Wei X, et al. The effects of dog management on Echinococcus spp. prevalence in villages on the eastern Tibetan Plateau, China[J]. Parasit Vectors, 2020, 13: 207. |
| [22] | Zhang TT, Li B, Liu YY, et al. Risk factors associated with echinococcosis in the general Chinese population: a meta-analysis and systematic review[J]. Front Public Health, 2022, 10: 821265. |
| [23] | Torgerson PR, Robertson LJ, Enemark HL, et al. Source attribution of human echinococcosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. PLoS Negl Trop Dis, 2020, 14(6): e0008382. |
| [24] | Wang LY, Qin M, Gavotte L, et al. Societal drivers of human echinococcosis in China[J]. Parasit Vectors, 2022, 15(1): 385. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |