研究简报

重庆市荣昌区务农种植人员钩虫感染现状及其影响因素分析

  • 朱勇 ,
  • 许静茹 ,
  • 闫书宁 ,
  • 李玲 ,
  • 蒋远娅 ,
  • 王兰 ,
  • 刘代强
展开
  • 1 重庆荣昌区疾病预防控制中心,重庆 402460
    2 重庆市疾病预防控制中心,重庆 400707
    3 中国疾病预防控制中心寄生虫病预防控制所(国家热带病研究中心);传染病溯源预警与智能决策全国重点实验室;国家卫生健康委员会寄生虫病原与媒介生物学重点实验室;世界卫生组织热带病合作中心;科技部国家级热带病国际联合研究中心,上海 200025
    4 重庆荣昌区人民医院,重庆 402460
朱勇(ORCID:0009-0007-8185-0793),男,本科,副主任检验技师,从事疾病控制与检测工作。E-mail:441734397@qq.com
* 刘代强,男,本科,副主任医师,从事基层外科常见病的诊断、治疗研究与数据分析工作。E-mail:2053890039@qq.com

收稿日期: 2024-09-06

  修回日期: 2024-11-30

  网络出版日期: 2025-04-25

基金资助

2024年荣昌区社会事业科技计划项目(荣科发[2024]9号)

Prevalence and risk factors of hookworm infections among agricultural planters in Rongchang District, Chongqing Municipality

  • ZHU Yong ,
  • XU Jingru ,
  • YAN Shuning ,
  • LI Ling ,
  • JIANG Yuanya ,
  • WANG Lan ,
  • LIU Daiqiang
Expand
  • 1 Chongqing Rongchang District Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Chongqing 402460, China
    2 Chongqing Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Chongqing 400707, China
    3 National Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention; Chinese Center for Tropical Diseases Research; National Key Laboratory of Intelligent Tracking and Forecasting for Infectious Diseases; NHC Key Laboratory on Parasite and Vector Biology; WHO Collaborating Centre for Tropical Diseases; National Center for International Research on Tropical Diseases, Ministry of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200025, China
    4 Chongqing Rongchang District People’s Hospital, Chongqing 402460, China

Received date: 2024-09-06

  Revised date: 2024-11-30

  Online published: 2025-04-25

Supported by

2024 Rongchang District Social Undertaking Science and Technology Plan Project (Rong Kefa [2024] No. 9)

摘要

为探讨重庆市荣昌区务农种植人员钩虫感染现状及其危险因素,于2024年以随机整群抽样方法抽取重庆市荣昌区东、西、南、北、中的5个自然村的务农种植人员为调查对象,通过问卷调查收集社会人口学特征、居住环境、农业劳作方式及卫生习惯等信息。采集调查对象粪便样品(> 30 g),改良加藤厚涂片法(一粪两检)检测钩虫感染情况。采集中度和重度感染者家庭土壤样品(每户户外田地或菜园土样和厕所周边阴凉处土样各1份)进行钩蚴分离,以美洲钩虫ITS2序列和十二指肠钩虫5.8S rRNA序列为分子靶标进行多重PCR扩增,邻接法(NJ)构建系统进化树。感染率的比较方法采用χ2和χ2趋势检验,独立危险因素分析采用条件Logistic回归模型。 结果显示,563名调查对象钩虫感染率为14.9%(84/563)。钩虫感染者平均感染度为841.4,其中轻、中和重度感染者分别占57.1%(48/84)、34.5%(29/84)和8.3%(7/84)。调查对象人群近5年内均未进行过肠道寄生虫查治,且未报告有钩虫感染相关的症状或体征。各组中年龄≥ 60岁(17.7%,65/367)、文化程度为文盲(27.8%,10/36)、家庭年收入< 20 000元(20.1%,59/294)、每年种植劳作时间≥ 1个月(17.7%,73/412)、家厕类型为老式旱厕(2/10)、种植旱田农作物(15.7%,84/534)、使用人粪施肥(20.6%,75/364)、经常/偶尔赤足下地劳作(21.3%,68/320)、经常/偶尔落地食物不洗捡食(18.6%,54/291)、经常/偶尔喝生水(18.2%,53/291)、经常/偶尔便后不洗手(21.8%,58/266)等人群钩虫感染率较高(χ2 = 8.022、8.920、15.780、9.476、9.793、4.194、26.213、23.402、6.275、5.145、18.827,均P < 0.05)。随着年龄增加、文化程度降低、家庭年收入减少和家厕卫生状况变差,钩虫感染率升高(χ2趋势 = 7.105、8.836、8.836、7.121,均P < 0.05)。使用人粪施肥(OR = 4.041,95%CI:1.937~8.429)、赤足下地劳作(OR = 2.726,95%CI:1.506~4.935)是务农种植人员钩虫感染的独立危险因素。60份土壤样品分离钩蚴后PCR扩增,6份呈阳性,均鉴定为美洲钩虫。建议进一步加强感染监测与治疗,开展重点人群健康教育及卫生行为干预,推进农村地区厕所环境整治及粪便无害化处理,切断传播途径以有效降低钩虫病流行风险。

本文引用格式

朱勇 , 许静茹 , 闫书宁 , 李玲 , 蒋远娅 , 王兰 , 刘代强 . 重庆市荣昌区务农种植人员钩虫感染现状及其影响因素分析[J]. 中国寄生虫学与寄生虫病杂志, 2025 , 43(2) : 290 -295 . DOI: 10.12140/j.issn.1000-7423.2025.02.022

Abstract

In order to investigate the current prevalence and risk factors of hookworm infections among agricultural planters in Rongchang District, Chongqing Municipality, agricultural planters were sampled using a random cluster sampling method from 5 natural villages in eastern, western, southern, northern and central parts of Rongchang District, Chongqing Municipality in 2024, and participants’ socio-demographic characteristics, living environments, agricultural labor style, and hygiene habits were collected through questionnaire surveys. Participants’ stool samples (> 30 g) were collected, and hookworm infection was detected using a Kato-Katz technique (two slides of one stool sample). Soil samples were collected from households with moderate and severe hookworm infections (one soil sample from each outdoor field or vegetable garden and one sample from a shaded area neighboring the toilet) for hookworm larval isolation. The ITS2 gene sequence of Necator americanus and the 5.8S rRNA gene sequence of Ancylostoma duodenale were amplified using multiplex PCR assay, and a phylogenetic tree was created using the neighbor-joining (NJ) method. Differences of prevalence of hookworm infections were compared with Chi-square test and Chi-square test for trend, and the independent risk factors of hookworm infections were identified using a conditional logistic regression model. The prevalence of hookworm infections was 14.9% (84/563) among 563 participants, with a mean infection intensity of 841.4, and the proportions of mild, moderate, and severe infections were 57.1% (48/84), 34.5% (29/84), and 8.3% (7/84), respectively. The participants had no history of examination or treatment for intestinal parasites during the past 5 years, and had no complaints of any hookworm infections-related symptoms or signs. Age of ≥ 60 years (17.7%, 65/367), an education level of illiteracy (27.8%, 10/36), annual family income < 20 000 RMB (20.1%, 59/294), annual growing labor duration of one month and longer (17.7%, 73/412), use of pit toilets (2/10), growing dryland crops (15.7%, 84/534), use of human feces as fertilizers (20.6%, 75/364), frequent/occasional barefoot labors (21.3%, 68/320), frequent/occasional consumption of food falling to the ground without washing (18.6%, 54/291), frequent/occasional drinking of unboiling water (18.2%, 53/291), frequent/occasional not handwashing post-defecation (21.8%, 58/266) resulted in a relatively higher incidence rate of hookworm infections among participants (χ2 = 8.022, 8.920, 15.780, 9.476, 9.793, 4.194, 26.213, 23.402, 6.275, 5.145, 18.827, all P < 0.05), and the prevalence of hookworm infections increased with age, reduced educational levels, decreased annual household incomes and poor hygiene of household toilets (χ2trend = 7.105, 8.836, 8.836, 7.121, all P < 0.05). Conditional logistic regression analysis identified use of human feces as fertilizers [odds ratio (OR) = 4.041, 95% confidence interval (CI): (1.937, 8.429)] and barefoot labor [OR = 2.726, 95% CI: (1.506, 4.935)] as independent risk factors for hookworm infections among agricultural planters. Hookworm larvae were isolated from 60 soil samples, and PCR assay tested positive in 6 samples, which were all characterized as N. americanus. It is recommended to intensify the surveillance and treatment of hookworm infections, implement health education and health behavior interventions among high-risk populations, improve toilet environmental modifications and harmless treatment of night soil in rural areas, and block the transmission routes of hookworm infection, in order to effectively reduce the risk of transmission of hookworm disease.

参考文献

[1] CDC. Soil-Transmitted Helminths 2024[EB/OL]. https://www.cdc.gov/sth/about/hookworm.htmlCDC_AAref_Val=https://www.cdc.gov/parasites/hookworm/index.html
[2] 陈颖丹, 周长海, 朱慧慧, 等. 2015年全国人体重点寄生虫病现状调查分析[J]. 中国寄生虫学与寄生虫病杂志, 2020, 38(1): 5-16.
  Chen YD, Zhou CH, Zhu HH, et al. National survey on the current status of important human parasitic diseases in China in 2015[J]. Chin J Parasitol Parasit Dis, 2020, 38(1): 5-16. (in Chinese)
[3] 张米禛, 黄继磊, 朱慧慧, 等. 2020年全国人体土源性线虫感染情况分析[J]. 中国寄生虫学与寄生虫病杂志, 2023, 41(3): 331-335, 343.
  Zhang MZ, Huang JL, Zhu HH, et al. Epidemiological analysis of soil-transmitted nematode infections in China in 2020[J]. Chin J Parasitol Parasit Dis, 2023, 41(3): 331-335, 343. (in Chinese)
[4] 赵陆源, 黄继磊, 周长海, 等. 2021年全国土源性线虫感染监测结果分析[J]. 中国寄生虫学与寄生虫病杂志, 2024, 42(6): 687-693.
  Zhao LY, Huang JL, Zhou CH, et al. National surveillance on soil-transmitted helminth infections in China, 2021[J]. Chin J Parasitol Parasit Dis, 2024, 42(6): 687-693. (in Chinese)
[5] 朱勇, 贺学俊, 吴维东, 等. 重庆市某区2017年农村土源性线虫病监测结果分析[J]. 热带医学杂志, 2018, 18(12): 1635-1638.
  Zhu Y, He XJ, Wu WD, et al. Analysis on the monitoring results of soilborne nematodes in rural area of Chongqing in 2017[J]. J Trop Med, 2018, 18(12): 1635-1638. (in Chinese)
[6] 中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会. 肠道蠕虫检测改良加藤厚涂片法: WS/T 570—2017[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2017.
  National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China. Detection of intestinal helminths—The Kato-Katz method: WS/T 570—2017[S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2017. (in Chinese)
[7] 国家卫生健康委员会. 全国肝吸虫病和土源性线虫病监测方案(试行)[S]. 北京: 国家卫生健康委员会, 2024.
  National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China. National Surveillance Program for Clonorchiasis and Soil-Transmitted Helminthiasis (Trial)[S]. Beijing: National Health Commission, 2024. (in Chinese)
[8] Ding X, Yang YG, Zhang YS, et al. Establishment of a simple and rapid nucleic acid detection method for hookworm identification[J]. Pathogens, 2023, 12(4): 630.
[9] 汪敏, 马晓荷, 张世清, 等. 2018—2019年安徽省蔬菜种植人员钩虫感染及危险因素分析[J]. 中国血吸虫病防治杂志, 2023, 35(1): 68-72.
  Wang M, Ma XH, Zhang SQ, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of hookworm infections among vegetable growers in Anhui Province from 2018 to 2019[J]. Chin J Schisto Control, 2023, 35(1): 68-72. (in Chinese)
[10] 谢君, 李珊珊. 重庆市人体土源性线虫感染相关因素分析[J]. 中国血吸虫病防治杂志, 2019, 31(5): 525-528.
  Xie J, Li SS. Analysis of factors related to human soil-transmitted nematode infections in Chongqing City[J]. Chin J Schisto Control, 2019, 31(5): 525-528. (in Chinese)
[11] 王笑笑, 姚立农, 陈华良, 等. 浙江省东南山区钩虫感染现况调查[J]. 预防医学, 2021, 33(11): 1130-1132.
  Wang XX, Yao LN, Chen HL, et al. Hookworm infection in southeast area of Zhejiang Province[J]. Prev Med, 2021, 33(11): 1130-1132. (in Chinese)
[12] 王龙江, 许艳, 孙慧, 等. 2021—2022年山东省土源性线虫感染监测结果分析[J]. 中国寄生虫学与寄生虫病杂志, 2024, 42(4): 537-541.
  Wang LJ, Xu Y, Sun H, et al. Analysis onsurveillance of soil-transmitted nematode infections in Shandong Province from 2021 to 2022[J]. Chin J Parasitol Parasit Dis, 2024, 42(4): 537-541. (in Chinese)
[13] 赵庆华, 曹俊, 李水明, 等. 2016—2020年句容市人群土源性线虫病监测结果分析[J]. 中国血吸虫病防治杂志, 2022, 34(1): 89-91.
  Zhao QH, Cao J, Li SM, et al. Surveillance of human soil-transmitted nematodiasis in Jurong City from 2016 to 2020[J]. Chin J Schisto Control, 2022, 34(1): 89-91. (in Chinese)
[14] 倪碧娴, 徐祥珍, 金小林, 等. 2017—2021年江苏省土源性线虫感染情况监测分析[J]. 中国寄生虫学与寄生虫病杂志, 2022, 40(6): 730-736.
  Ni BX, Xu XZ, Jin XL, et al. Analysis of surveillance on soil-transmitted nematode infections in Jiangsu Province from 2017 to 2021[J]. Chin J Parasitol Parasit Dis, 2022, 40(6): 730-736. (in Chinese)
[15] Ziegelbauer K, Speich B, M?usezahl D, et al. Effect of sanitation on soil-transmitted helminth infection: Systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. PLoS Med, 2012, 9(1): e1001162.
[16] 诸廷俊, 周长海, 王聚君, 等. 8个干预示范区停止干预措施后土源性线虫病的控制现状评价[J]. 中国寄生虫学与寄生虫病杂志, 2017, 35(5): 439-444.
  Zhu TJ, Zhou CH, Wang JJ, et al. Evaluation of soil-transmitted helminth control after cessation of intervention measures in eight demonstration plots[J]. Chin J Parasitol Parasit Dis, 2017, 35(5): 439-444. (in Chinese)
[17] 李燕榕, 李莉莎, 程由注, 等. 福建省钩虫感染分布现状及其影响因素分析[J]. 中国病原生物学杂志, 2008, 3(11): 843-846.
  Li YR, Li LS, Cheng YZ, et al. Distribution and risk factors of hookworm infection in Fujian Province[J]. J Pathog Biol, 2008, 3(11): 843-846. (in Chinese)
[18] Gasser RB, Cantacessi C, Loukas A. DNA technological progress toward advanced diagnostic tools to support human hookworm control[J]. Biotechnol Adv, 2008, 26(1): 35-45.
[19] Massetti L, Colella V, Zendejas PA, et al. High-throughput multiplex qPCRs for the surveillance of zoonotic species of canine hookworms[J]. PLoS Negl Trop Dis, 2020, 14(6): e0008392.
[20] 牛庆丽, 罗建勋, 殷宏. 转录间隔区(ITS)在寄生虫分子生物学分类中的应用及其进展[J]. 中国兽医寄生虫病, 2008, 16(4): 41-47.
  Niu QL, Luo JX, Yin H. Advances and application of rdna-its in the molecular taxonomy of parasite[J]. Chin J Vet Parasitol, 2008, 16(4): 41-47. (in Chinese)
文章导航

/

〈 〉