论著

内蒙古自治区棘球蚴病流行基线抽样调查与分析

  • 韩松 ,
  • 雷霞 ,
  • 聂莉 ,
  • 罗文博 ,
  • 姜晓峰
展开
  • 1 内蒙古自治区疾病预防控制中心,内蒙古 呼和浩特 010031
    2 通辽市第六人民医院,内蒙古 通辽 028000
韩松,男,本科,主管技师,主要从事传染病防控研究。E-mail:1240295906@qq.com
*姜晓峰(ORCID:0000-0002-3940-7110),男,硕士,主任医师,主要从事传染病防控和卫生应急研究。E-mail: 117826929@qq.com

收稿日期: 2024-11-05

  修回日期: 2025-01-25

  网络出版日期: 2025-03-26

基金资助

内蒙古自治区科技计划(2021GG0132);内蒙古卫生健康科技计划(202201170);内蒙古卫生健康科技计划(202201171)

Baseline sampling survey and analysis of the pidemiology of echinococcosis in Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region

  • HAN Song ,
  • LEI Xia ,
  • NIE Li ,
  • LUO Wenbo ,
  • JIANG Xiaofeng
Expand
  • 1 The center for Disease Control and Prevention of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, Huhehaote 010031, Inner Mongolia, China
    2 The Sixth People’s Hospital of Tongliao City, Tongliao 028000, Inner Mongolia, China

Received date: 2024-11-05

  Revised date: 2025-01-25

  Online published: 2025-03-26

Supported by

Science and Technology Plan of Inner Mongolia(2021GG0132);Science and Technology Plan of Health and Hygiene in Inner Mongolia(202201170);Science and Technology Plan of Health and Hygiene in Inner Mongolia(202201171)

摘要

目的 了解内蒙古自治区棘球蚴病流行范围和程度,为科学防控提供依据。方法 2012—2018年采用分层整群抽样法对内蒙古11个盟市的36个旗(县、市、区)进行棘球蚴病流行基线抽样调查与分析,各旗(县、市、区)调查约3 200人,采用超声检测诊断人棘球蚴病患病情况并记录信息。在调查村养犬户随机采集犬的粪样(每户1条犬),采用ELISA法检测犬粪棘球绦虫抗原。内脏剖检法检查家畜(羊)棘球蚴感染情况。结果 22个旗(县、市、区)发现棘球蚴病患者,其中牧业区15个、半农半牧区5个、农业区2个。发现病例数最多旗县为西乌珠穆沁旗(16例,占21.6%),患病率介于0.10%~0.50%的旗(县、市、区)有6个,介于0.03%~0.10%的有16个。共调查115 155人,共检出74例棘球蚴病患者,均为细粒棘球蚴病,患病率为0.11%(74/115 155)。女性(患病率0.08%,51/60 544)、30~59岁年龄段(占比60.81%,45/74)、牧民(占比55.41%,41/74)文化程度为小学(患病率0.10%,39/39 237)和游牧人群(患病率0.29%,6/2 097)人群是高风险人群。36个旗(县、市、区)采集犬粪17 909份,犬粪棘球绦虫抗原阳性率为1.84%(330/17 909)。26个旗(县、市、区)发现阳性犬粪,犬粪阳性率≥ 5.00%的有1个(新巴尔虎右旗11.75%),1.00%~5.00%的有18个,0.29%~1.00%的有8个。33个旗(县、市、区)共检查羊32 100头,羊棘球蚴病患病率为0.46%。14个旗(县、市、区)发现棘球蚴患病羊,患病率介于0.10%~7.30%,患病率 > 1.00%的旗(县、市、区)有3个,均为牧业区。结论 内蒙古棘球蚴病流行范围较广,整体流行水平较低。存在明显的地区和人群聚集分布特征,应加强重点地域和人群的防控工作。

本文引用格式

韩松 , 雷霞 , 聂莉 , 罗文博 , 姜晓峰 . 内蒙古自治区棘球蚴病流行基线抽样调查与分析[J]. 中国寄生虫学与寄生虫病杂志, 2025 , 43(1) : 26 -29 . DOI: 10.12140/j.issn.1000-7423.2025.01.005

Abstract

Objective To investigate the epidemiology of echinococcosis in Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, so as to provide insights into echinococcosis control. Methods Baseline surveys on the epidemiology of echinococcosis were performed using a stratified cluster sampling method in 36 banners (counties, cities, districts) across 11 leagues (cities) in Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region from 2012 to 2018. Approximately 3 200 residents were recruited in each banner (county, city, district), and human echinococcosis was diagnosed with ultrasound. Fecal samples were randomly collected from one dog per household in the surveyed villages, and the Echinococcus coproantigen was detected using ELISA in dogs. In addition, Echinococcus infection was identified using necropsy in livestock (sheep). Results Echinococcosis patients were diagnosed in 22 banners (counties, cities, districts), including 15 in pastoral areas, 5 in semi-agricultural and semi-pastoral areas, and 2 in agricultural areas. The highest number of echinococcosis cases was recorded in Xiwuzhumuqin Banner (16 cases, 21.6% of all cases), and there were 6 banners (counties, cities, districts) with echinococcosis prevalence of 0.10% to 0.50%, and 16 with prevalence of 0.03% to 0.10%. A total of 115 155 residents received ultrasound screening for echinococcosis, and 74 residents were diagnosed with echinococcosis (all cystic echinococcosis), with a prevalence rate of 0.11% (74/115 155). Women (0.08% prevalence, 51/60 544), residents at ages of 30 to 59 years (accounting for 60.81%, 45/74), herders (accounting for 55.41%, 41/74), residents with an educational level of primary school (0.10% prevalence, 39/39 237), and nomadic populations (0.29% prevalence, 6/2 097) were identified at a high risk of echinococcosis. A total of 17 909 dog feces samples were collected from 36 banners (counties, cities, districts), and the positive rate of Echinococcus coproantigen was 1.84% (330/17 909) in dogs. Dog feces positive for Echinococcus coproantigen was detected in 26 banners (counties, cities, districts), and there was one banner with a 5.00% and higher positive rate of Echinococcus coproantigen in dogs (New Barag Right Banner, 11.75%), 18 banners (counties, cities, districts) with positive rates of 1.00% to 5.00% and 8 banners (counties, cities, districts) with positive rates of 0.29% to 1.00%. A total of 32 100 sheep were examined for echinococcosis in 33 banners (counties, cities, districts), and the prevalence of echinococcosis was 0.46%. Sheep with echinococcosis were found in 14 banners (counties, cities, districts), with echinococcosis prevalence of 0.10% to 7.30%, and there were 3 banners (counties, cities, districts) with echinococcosis prevalence of > 1.00%, all in pastoral areas. Conclusion Echinococcosis is widely but overall lowly prevalent in Inner Mongolia, and there are obvious regional and population clustering distributions. Intensified echinococcosis prevention and control is recommended in key areas and populations.

参考文献

[1] 蒉嫣, 薛垂召, 王旭, 等. 2022年全国棘球蚴病防治工作进展[J]. 中国寄生虫学与寄生虫病杂志, 2024, 42(1): 8-16.
  Kui Y, Xue CZ, Wang X, et al. Progress of echinococcosis control in China, 2022[J]. Chin J Parasitol Parasit Dis, 2024, 42(1): 8-16. (in Chinese)
[2] 王强, 许静, 夏志贵, 等. 我国重点寄生虫病疫情形势及防控工作重点[J]. 中国寄生虫学与寄生虫病杂志, 2024, 42(1): 1-7.
  Wang Q, Xu J, Xia ZG, et al. Epidemic status and key tasks for the control and elimination of key parasitic diseases in China[J]. Chin J Parasitol Parasit Dis, 2024, 42(1): 1-7. (in Chinese)
[3] 姜晓峰, 冯克民, 郝慧霞, 等. 2013—2018年内蒙古自治区棘球蚴病报告病例空间分布特征[J]. 中国血吸虫病防治杂志, 2020, 32(3): 268-272.
  Jiang XF, Feng KM, Hao HX, et al. Spatial distribution characteristics of reported echinococcosis patients in Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region from 2013 to 2018[J]. Chin J Schisto Control, 2020, 32(3): 268-272. (in Chinese)
[4] 伍卫平, 王虎, 王谦, 等. 2012—2016年中国棘球蚴病抽样调查分析[J]. 中国寄生虫学与寄生虫病杂志, 2018, 36(1): 1-14.
  Wu WP, Wang H, Wang Q, et al. A nationwide sampling survey on echinococcosis in China during 2012-2016[J]. Chin J Parasitol Parasit Dis, 2018, 36(1): 1-14. (in Chinese)
[5] Li B, Quzhen G, Xue CZ, et al. Epidemiological survey of echinococcosis in Tibet Autonomous Region of China[J]. Infect Dis Poverty, 2019, 8: 29.
[6] 王谦, 邱加闽, Peter Schantz, 等. 四川省西部藏区家庭饲养牲畜人群包虫病风险因素的调查[J]. 中国寄生虫学与寄生虫病杂志, 2001, 19(2): 93-96. (in English)
  Wang Q, Qiu JM, Schantz P, et al. Investigation of risk factors for development of human hydatidosis among households raising livestock in Tibetan areas of western Sichuan Province[J]. Chin J Parasitol Parasit Dis, 2001, 19(2): 93-96.
[7] 王玉莹, 姜晓峰, 郝慧霞, 等. 2010—2019年内蒙古自治区棘球蚴病流行特征及防治效果分析[J]. 热带病与寄生虫学, 2021, 19 (1): 6-9, 31.
  Wang YY, Jiang XF, Hao HX, et al. Analysison the epidemiological characteristics and control effect of echinococcosis in Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region from 2010 to 2019[J]. J Trop Dis Parasitol, 2021, 19 (1): 6-9, 31. (in Chinese)
[8] 杨诗杰, 马俊英, 张雪飞, 等. 智能项圈在包虫病犬驱虫应用中的初步评价[J]. 疾病监测, 2022, 37(9): 1216-1222.
  Yang SJ, Ma JY, Zhang XF, et al. Preliminary evaluation of application of smart collar in dog deworming in echinococcosis control[J]. Disease Surveillance, 2022, 37(9): 1216-1222. (in Chinese)
[9] 朱曜宇, 伍卫平, 官亚宜, 等. 四川省道孚县棘球蚴病防治中犬驱虫成本分析[J]. 中国寄生虫学与寄生虫病杂志. 2016, 34(2): 144-149.
  Zhu YY, Wu WP, Guan YY, et al. Cost analysis of dog deworming in echinococcosis control program in Daofu, Sichuan Province[J]. Chin J Parasitol Parasit Dis, 2016, 34(2): 144-149. (in Chinese)
[10] 余晴, 周晓农. 我国棘球蚴病防治工作中健康素养提升策略之探讨[J]. 中国血吸虫病防治杂志, 2019, 31(1): 94-97.
  Yu Q, Zhou XN. Discussion on strategies of health literacy promotion for echinococcosis control in China[J]. Chin J Schisto Control, 2019, 31(1): 94-97. (in Chinese)
文章导航

/

〈 〉