收稿日期: 2024-05-05
修回日期: 2024-07-16
网络出版日期: 2024-09-29
基金资助
国家重点研发计划(2021YFC2300800);国家重点研发计划(2021YFC2300804);国家自然科学基金(32161143036);国家自然科学基金(32311540013);一带一路澜湄热带病防控联合实验室项目(21410750200);上海市加强公共卫生体系建设三年行动计划(2023—2025)
Analysis on Taenia infection and serum cysticercus antibody in population and their risk factors in Dali, Yunnan Province
Received date: 2024-05-05
Revised date: 2024-07-16
Online published: 2024-09-29
Supported by
National Key Research and Development Program(2021YFC2300800);National Key Research and Development Program(2021YFC2300804);National Natural Science Foundation of China(32161143036);National Natural Science Foundation of China(32311540013);Belt and Road Lancang-Mekong Tropical Disease Prevention and Control Joint Laboratory Project(21410750200);Shanghai Strengthening Key Discipline Projects of the Three-Year Action Plan for Public Health System Construction(2023—2025)
目的 分析云南大理地区人群带绦虫感染和囊尾蚴抗体的流行特征及影响因素,为带绦虫和囊尾蚴病的防控提供科学依据。 方法 2023年10—11月,在大理州带绦虫病和囊尾蚴病历史流行区选择大把关村、伙山村、金刚村和清水沟村开展调查,采用整群随机抽样的方法,抽取调查村3周岁以上常住居民为调查对象。通过问卷调查收集是否有排节片史、皮下结节、癫痫和剧烈头痛等症状以及饮食习惯、卫生行为和居住环境等信息;采集究对象粪样进行改良加藤厚涂片法(Kato-Katz法,一粪两检)检测,对粪检阳性或近一年有排节片史者采用槟榔南瓜子法进行药物诊断性驱虫。以粪检阳性或驱出虫体者为阳性感染者,计算带绦虫感染率。用囊尾蚴(猪带绦虫)IgG抗体检测试剂盒检测血清囊尾蚴特异性抗体。采用卡方检验、Fisher确切概率法和logistic回归分析对人群带绦虫感染和血清囊尾蚴抗体阳性的影响因素进行统计学分析。 结果 4个村共1 842人参与问卷调查,近一年排节片者39人(占2.1%)。粪检1 533人,粪检阳性者25人(占1.6%)。共38人接受诊断性驱虫,33人驱出完整虫体(1名粪检阳性者未驱出虫体),人群带绦虫感染率为1.8%(34/1 842)。金刚、伙山、大把关和清水沟村人群带绦虫感染率分别为2.1%(10/475)、1.3%(6/450)、2.7%(12/450)、1.3%(6/467),差异无统计学意义(χ2 = 3.31,P > 0.05)。男性感染率为2.6%(22/848),女性为1.2%(12/994)(χ2 = 4.90,P < 0.05);30~59岁年龄组(2.8%,24/862)、苗族(1/2)和农牧民(3.0%,28/944)等人群的感染率在各组中均为最高(χ2 = 10.10,P < 0.01;Fisher = 26.04,P < 0.01;χ2 = 13.47,P < 0.01)。人群血清囊尾蚴抗体阳性率为9.2%(82/887)。清水沟、大把关、伙山和金刚村的血清抗体阳性率分别为12.7%(20/157)、4.7%(11/236)、10.4%(26/251)、10.3%(25/243),差异有统计学意义(χ2 = 8.88,P < 0.05)。男性阳性率为9.2%(36/393),女性为9.3%(46/494)(χ2 = 0.01,P > 0.05)。60岁以上年龄组(2.8%,24/862)、农牧民(11.2%,61/546)和文盲(15.0%,35/234)等人群的血清抗体阳性率在各组内均为最高(χ2 = 8.66、12.37、6.47,P < 0.05 或 0.01)。单因素分析结果显示,不同性别、年龄、民族、职业和食用生猪制品(生猪皮、猪肉、猪肝)是带绦虫感染的影响因素(χ2 = 4.86、10.10、26.04、13.48、5.72,均为P < 0.05)。每月食用生猪制品的次数与带绦虫感染率之间存在正相关关系[OR = 1.135,95% CI:(1.023,1.259)];不同年龄、文化程度、职业、是否使用自来水及食用生猪制品是血清囊尾蚴抗体阳性率的影响因素(χ2 = 8.66、12.37、6.47、3.58、2.20,均为P < 0.05)。多因素分析结果显示,男性[OR = 2.047,95% CI:(1.001,4.189)]、食用生猪制品[OR = 4.986,95% CI:(1.166,21.321)]是人群感染带绦虫的危险因素,低文化程度[OR = 2.051,95% CI:(1.183,3.557)]是人群血清囊尾蚴抗体阳性的危险因素,使用自来水[OR = 0.320,95% CI:(0.124,0.824)]是人群血清囊尾蚴抗体阳性的保护因素。 结论 云南大理地区人群带绦虫感染率和血清囊尾蚴抗体阳性率较高,食用生猪制品和男性是带绦虫感染的危险因素;自来水的使用和高文化程度是血清囊尾蚴抗体阳性的保护因素。
王文雅 , 刘剑峰 , 张米禛 , 钱沛君 , 刘柳 , 赵陆源 , 李科荣 , 张冬琦 , 刘瑜华 , 刘宏坤 , 陈绍荣 , 周长海 , 钱门宝 , 李石柱 . 云南大理人群带绦虫感染和血清囊尾蚴抗体调查及其影响因素分析[J]. 中国寄生虫学与寄生虫病杂志, 2024 , 42(5) : 615 -622 . DOI: 10.12140/j.issn.1000-7423.2024.05.008
Objective To analyze the epidemic characteristics and influencing factors of Taenia infection and cysticercus antibody in the residents of Dali, Yunnan, to provide a scientific basis for prevention and control of taeniasis and cysticercosis. Methods From October to November 2023, a survey was conducted in Dabaguan Village, Huoshan Village, Jingang Village and Qingshuigou Village in the historical endemic area of taeniasis and cysticercosis in Dali Prefecture. Permanent residents aged over 3 years were enrolled in the survey using the method of cluster random sampling. A questionnaire survey was conducted to collect information including whether there was a history of proglottid excreted, subcutaneous nodules, symptoms of epilepsy and severe headache, as well as the dietary habits, hygiene behaviors and living environment. Fecal samples were collected, and examined by the modified Kato-Katz method (two slide-reading for each sample). For residents with positive fecal test results or with a history of excreting proglottids in the past year, pharmacological diagnostic deworming was conducted using the areca-pumpkin seed method. Those positives in fecal examination and found expelled worms were considered as the infected persons and used to calculate the infection rate. Serum cysticercus specific antibodies were detected using cysticercus (Taenia solium) IgG antibody detection kit. The chi-square test, Fisher’s exact probability method and logistic regression analysis were used to analyze the influencing factors of Taenia infection and serum cysticercus antibody positivity in the population. Results A total of 1 842 people from the 4 villages participated in the questionnaire survey, and 39 people (2.1%) had excreted proglottids in the past year. Fecal examination was performed on 1 533 people, and 25 people (1.6%) were found positive. A total of 39 people received diagnostic deworming, and 33 people expelled complete worms (1 person positive in fecal examination did not expel the parasite), and the infection rate was 1.8% (34/1 842). The infection rates in the Jingang, Huoshan, Dabaguan and Qingshuigou villages were 2.1% (10/475), 1.3% (6/450), 2.7% (12/450) and 1.3% (6/467), respectively, with no significant difference (χ2 = 3.31, P > 0.05). The infection rate was 2.6% (22/848) in males and 1.2% (12/994) in females (χ2 = 4.90, P < 0.05). The infection rates of the 30-59 age group (2.8%, 24/862), Miao (1/2), and farmers and herdsmen (3.0%, 28/944) were the highest in each group (χ2 = 10.10, P < 0.01; Fisher = 26.04, P < 0.01; χ2 = 13.47, P < 0.01). The positive rate of serum cysticercus antibody was 9.2% (82/887). Positive rates of serum antibodies in Qingshuigou, Dabaguan, Huoshan and Jingang villages were 12.7% (20/157), 4.7% (11/236), 10.4% (26/251) and 10.3% (25/243), respectively, with significant differences (χ2 = 8.88, P < 0.05). The positive rates in males were 9.2% (36/393) and 9.3% (46/494) in females (χ2 = 0.01, P > 0.05). The serum antibody positive rates in the groups aged 60 years and above (2.8%, 24/862), farmers and herdsmen (11.2%, 61/546) and illiterate people (15.0%, 35/234) were the highest in each group (χ2 = 8.66, 12.37, 6.47, P < 0.05 or 0.01). The results of univariate analysis showed that gender, age, nationality, occupation and consuming raw pork products (raw pig skin, pork and liver) were the influencing factors of Taenia infection (χ2 = 4.86, 10.10, 26.04, 13.48, 5.72, all P < 0.05). There was a positive correlation between the frequency of consuming raw pork products per month and Taenia infection rate[OR = 1.135, 95% CI: (1.023, 1.259)]. The age, education level, occupation, use of tap water and consuming raw pork products were influencing factors for the positive rate of serum cysticercus antibody (χ2 = 8.66, 12.37, 6.47, 3.58, 2.20, all P < 0.05). The results of multivariate analysis showed that males [OR = 2.047, 95% CI: (1.001, 4.189) ] and eating raw pork products [OR = 4.986, 95% CI: (1.166, 21.321) ] were the risk factors for Taenia infection. The low education level [OR = 2.051, 95% CI: (1.183, 3.557)] was a risk factor for positive serum cysticercus antibody, while using tap water [OR = 0.320, 95% CI: (0.124, 0.824) ] was a protective factor for positive serum cysticercus antibody. Conclusion Considerably high Taenia infection rate and positive rate of serum cysticercus antibody are observed in the residents of Dali, Yunnan. Eating raw pork products and male gender are the risk factors for Taenia infection; using tap water and high education level are the protective factors for positive serum cysticercus antibody.
Key words: Taeniasis; Cysticercosis; Infection rate; Epidemiological investigation; Risk factor
| [1] | Ito A, Nakao M, Wandra T. Human taeniasis and cysticercosis in Asia[J]. Lancet, 2003, 362(9399): 1918-1920. |
| [2] | Zhu XP, Su C. Human parasitology[M]. 9th ed. Beijing: People’s Medical Publishing House, 2018: 166-167. (in Chinese) |
| (诸欣平, 苏川. 人体寄生虫学[M]. 9版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2018: 166-167.) | |
| [3] | Xu LQ, Zhou CH, Jiang ZX, et al. Summary of clinical characteristics of cysticercosis in China[J]. Mod Rehabil, 1998, 2(1): 67-68. (in Chinese) |
| (许隆祺, 周长海, 蒋则孝, 等. 我国囊虫病的临床特征概述[J]. 现代康复, 1998, 2(1): 67-68.) | |
| [4] | Qian MB, Xiao N, Li SZ, et al. Control of taeniasis and cysticercosis in China[J]. Adv Parasitol, 2020, 110: 289-317. |
| [5] | Chen JX, Cai YC, Ai L, et al. Epidemic status and challenges of important human parasitic diseases in China[J]. Lab Med, 2021, 36(10): 993-1000. (in Chinese) |
| (陈家旭, 蔡玉春, 艾琳, 等. 我国重要人体寄生虫病防控现状与挑战[J]. 检验医学, 2021, 36(10): 993-1000.) | |
| [6] | Yu SH, Xu LQ, Jiang ZX, et al. Report on the first nationwide survey of ihe distribution of human parasites in china1.regional distribution of rarasite species[J]. Chin J Parasitol Parasit Dis, 1994, 12(4): 241-247. (in Chinese) |
| (余森海, 许隆祺, 蒋则孝, 等. 首次全国人体寄生虫分布调查的报告Ⅰ.虫种的地区分布[J]. 中国寄生虫学与寄生虫病杂志, 1994, 12(4): 241-247.) | |
| [7] | Chen YD, Zhou CH, Zhu HH, et al. National survey on the current status of important human parasitic diseases in China in 2015[J]. Chin J Parasitol Parasit Dis, 2020, 38(1): 5-16. (in Chinese) |
| (陈颖丹, 周长海, 朱慧慧, 等. 2015年全国人体重点寄生虫病现状调查分析[J]. 中国寄生虫学与寄生虫病杂志, 2020, 38(1): 5-16.) | |
| [8] | Zhou XN. Report on the national survey of important human parasitic diseases in China (2015)[M]. Beijing: People’s Medical Publishing House, 2018: 69-71. (in Chinese) |
| (周晓农. 2015年全国人体重点寄生虫病现状调查报告[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2018: 69-71.) | |
| [9] | Wang LD. National Survey on Key Human Parasitic Diseases[M]. Beijing: People’s Medical Publishing House, 2008: 67-69. (in Chinese) |
| (王陇德. 全国人体重要寄生虫病现状调查[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2008: 67-69.) | |
| [10] | Li TY, Ito A, Chen XW, et al. Usefulness of pumpkin seeds combined with areca nut extract in community-based treatment of human taeniasis in northwest Sichuan Province, China[J]. Acta Trop, 2012, 124(2): 152-157. |
| [11] | Ministry of Health of the People’s Republic of China. Diagnosis of taeniasis: WS/T 379-2012[S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2012: 1-16. (in Chinese) |
| (中华人民共和国卫生部. 带绦虫病的诊断: WS/T 379—2012[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2012: 1-16.) | |
| [12] | Guzman C, Garcia HH, Peru CWGI. Current diagnostic criteria for neurocysticercosis[J]. Res Rep Trop Med, 2021, 12: 197-203. |
| [13] | Zhang LL, Tao H, Zhang BX, et al. Pilot study on prevention and treatment of Asian anosomiasis in Yunnan Province[J]. J Pathog Biol, 2005(1): 171-172. (in Chinese) |
| (张莉莉, 陶洪, 张炳翔, 等. 云南省防治亚洲无钩绦虫病试点研究[J]. 中国寄生虫病防治杂志, 2005(1): 171-172.) | |
| [14] | Wang HZ, Zhang HM, Zhang LL, et al. Investigation and analysis of Taenia saginata asiatica infection among people in part of Yunnan[J]. China Trop Med, 2018, 18(11): 1150-1152. (in Chinese) |
| (王会珍, 张皓明, 张莉莉, 等. 云南部分地区人群亚洲带绦虫感染现状调查与分析[J]. 中国热带医学, 2018, 18(11): 1150-1152.) | |
| [15] | Xu LQ. Distribution and pathogenic impact of human parasites in China[M]. Beijing: People’s Medical Publishing House, 2000: 3-13, 85-213, 448-463. (in Chinese) |
| (许隆祺. 中国人体寄生虫分布与危害[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2000: 3-13, 85-213, 448-463.) | |
| [16] | Wang SW, Liu HK, Li KR, et al. Monitoring results of taeniasis in Dali City from 2016 to 2019[J]. J Trop Dis Parasitol, 2020, 18(4): 207-210. (in Chinese) |
| (王尚位, 刘宏坤, 李科荣, 等. 2016—2019年大理市带绦虫病疫情监测结果分析[J]. 热带病与寄生虫学, 2020, 18(4): 207-210.) | |
| [17] | Chen XW, Huang L, Yu WJ, et al. Prevalence of taeniasis and sero-prevalence of anti-cysticercus antibody among residents in Tibetan agricultural areas of Sichuan Province[J]. Chin J Schisto Control, 2023, 35(6): 633-637, 645. (in Chinese) |
| (陈兴旺, 黄琳, 喻文杰, 等. 四川省藏族农区人群带绦虫病患病和血清抗囊尾蚴抗体水平调查[J]. 中国血吸虫病防治杂志, 2023, 35(6): 633-637, 645.) | |
| [18] | Bianbazhuoma, Danzengquzhen. Investigation and analysis of human tapeworm infection in Shannan City of Tibet Autonomous Region in 2015[J]. Chin J Contr Endem Dis, 2020, 35(5): 558-559. (in Chinese) |
| (边巴卓玛, 旦增曲珍. 西藏自治区山南市2015年人体带绦虫感染现状调查分析[J]. 中国地方病防治, 2020, 35(5): 558-559.) | |
| [19] | Yang YM, Li Z, Shi WX. Epidemiological investigation on the prevalence of Taeina around Erhai Lake of Dali, China[J]. J Pathog Biol, 2007, 2(2): 109, 114. (in Chinese) |
| (杨毅梅, 李振, 石武祥. 云南大理洱海环湖带绦虫流行病学调查[J]. 中国病原生物学杂志, 2007, 2(2): 109, 114.) | |
| [20] | Xu LQ, Chen YD, Sun FH, et al. A national survey on current status of the important parasitic diseases in human population[J]. Chin J Parasitol Parasit Dis, 2005, 23(S1): 332-340. (in Chinese) |
| (许隆祺, 陈颖丹, 孙凤华, 等. 全国人体重要寄生虫病现状调查报告[J]. 中国寄生虫学与寄生虫病杂志, 2005, 23(S1): 332-340.) | |
| [21] | Openshaw JJ, Medina A, Felt SA, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for Taenia solium cysticercosis in school-aged children: a school based study in western Sichuan, People’s Republic of China[J]. PLoS Negl Trop Dis, 2018, 12(5): e0006465. |
| [22] | Willingham AL 3rd, Wu HW, Conlan J, et al. Combating Taenia solium cysticercosis in Southeast Asia an opportunity for improving human health and livestock production[J]. Adv Parasitol, 2010, 72: 235-266. |
| [23] | García HH, González AE, Del Brutto OH, et al. Strategies for the elimination of taeniasis/cysticercosis[J]. J Neurol Sci, 2007, 262(1/2): 153-157. |
| [24] | Li HZ, Zang XZ, Qian MB, et al. Current status and research progress of cysticercosis[J]. Chin J Schisto Control, 2018, 30(1): 99-103. (in Chinese) |
| (李焕璋, 臧新中, 钱门宝, 等. 囊尾蚴病流行现况及研究进展[J]. 中国血吸虫病防治杂志, 2018, 30(1): 99-103.) | |
| [25] | de Coster T, van Damme I, Baauw J, et al. Recent advancements in the control of Taenia solium: a systematic review[J]. Food Waterborne Parasitol, 2018, 13: e00030. |
| [26] | Guo ZY, Liu JF, Zhou CH, et al. Current status and challenges for taeniasis and cysticercosis control in China[J]. Chin J Schisto Control, 2021, 33(6): 563-569. (in Chinese) |
| (郭照宇, 刘剑峰, 周长海, 等. 我国带绦虫病和囊尾蚴病防治现状与挑战[J]. 中国血吸虫病防治杂志, 2021, 33(6): 563-569.) |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |