收稿日期: 2023-12-15
修回日期: 2024-03-16
网络出版日期: 2024-08-22
基金资助
新疆自然保护地调查与国家公园潜力区科学考察(2021xjkk1201);国家林草局野生动植物保护司物种保护项目(2022-HXFWBHQ-LK-03);新疆维吾尔自治区林业和草原局寄生虫防控项目(2024-HXFWBH-LK-01)
Metagenomic analysis and potential assessment of Hyalomma asiaticum in the distribution area of Przewalski’s horses
Received date: 2023-12-15
Revised date: 2024-03-16
Online published: 2024-08-22
Supported by
Investigation of natural protected areas and scientific investigation of potential areas of National Parks in Xinjiang(2021xjkk1201);Species Project of Department for Wildlife and Forest Plants Protection(2022-HXFWBHQ-LK-03);Parasite Control Project of the Forestry and Grassland Bureau of Xinjiang(2024-HXFWBH-LK-01)
目的 评估亚洲璃眼蜱在普氏野马分布区域传播疾病的潜在风险,研究雌、雄蜱在宏基因组水平的特征并进行病原体分析。 方法 2022年4月,在新疆卡拉麦里山有蹄类自然保护区使用“守株待蜱”法采集硬蜱,利用体视镜进行形态学鉴定,提取48只蜱(雌、雄各24只)DNA,PCR扩增线粒体细胞色素C氧化酶第1亚基(COⅠ)序列进行分子生物学鉴定。将雌、雄亚洲璃眼蜱分组进行宏基因组测序,非冗余基因集与非冗余蛋白(NR)数据库进行比对,分析蜱携带的微生物群落组成;与京都基因与基因组百科全书(KEGG)数据库和抗生素抗性基因数据库(ARDB)进行比对,获取蜱及蜱传病原体的基因功能注释结果以及抗生素抗性功能注释结果。数据的比较采用t检验分析。 结果 共采集硬蜱124只,经形态学鉴定亚洲璃眼蜱成虫119只。硬蜱DNA扩增出约700 bp的阳性条带,经测序与亚洲璃眼蜱(GenBank:MH459386.1)的序列一致性为99%~100%。宏基因组测序经质控过滤共获得469 327 812条序列读长,开放阅读框预测得到836 843~1 094 994条序列。NR数据库比对结果显示,亚洲璃眼蜱携带的细菌菌落丰度占注释到的总群落丰度的99.13%,共注释到细菌32门2 040种,变形菌门和放线菌门为优势菌门,分别占细菌群落丰度的51.52%和44.35%;嗜吞噬细胞无形体为优势菌种,占细菌群落丰度的16.35%。病毒菌落丰度占注释到的总群落丰度的0.004%,共注释到病毒5门21种。雌蜱和雄蜱携带的细菌群落和病毒群落的丰富度及多样性差异均无统计学意义(t = -1.180、-1.729,均P > 0.05)。KEGG基因功能注释到亚洲璃眼蜱新陈代谢基因占比最高(54.38%),主要的功能条目为氨基酸代谢、碳水化合物代谢、膜转运等;共识别出11 352种蛋白通路,其中154种蛋白通路在雌蜱和雄蜱间的差异有统计学意义(t = -2.348,P < 0.05)。ARDB注释到亚洲璃眼蜱携带154种抗生素抗性基因,包括49种抗性基因类型,主要抗性基因类型为Baca(占62.53%),抗生素类型为肝菌肽。大部分注释到的抗性基因与多重耐药相关,如Mexf、Mexb、Emrd、Mexw等。雌蜱和雄蜱在抗生素抗性基因类型的差异性对比结果显示,仅雌蜱的Emrd基因抗性高于雄蜱(t = -7.558,P < 0.05)。 结论 本研究在宏基因组水平上揭示了亚洲璃眼蜱携带的主要细菌、病毒群落及多重耐药相关的抗生素抗性基因,雌蜱及其携带的病原体具有较高的物种丰度和基因丰度。
张钰 , 张科 , 刘佳伟 , 王安琪 , 团勇 , 张东 , 闫利平 , 李凯 . 普氏野马分布区域亚洲璃眼蜱的宏基因组分析与病原体评估[J]. 中国寄生虫学与寄生虫病杂志, 2024 , 42(4) : 439 -446 . DOI: 10.12140/j.issn.1000-7423.2024.04.003
Objective To evaluate the potential risk of disease transmission by Hyalomma asiaticum in the distribution area of Przewalski’s horses, investigate the metagenomic characteristics and conduct pathogen analysis of male and female ticks. Methods In April 2022, tick samples were collected using the “waiting for ticks” method in the Kalamaili Mountain Ungulate Nature Reserve in Xinjiang. The ticks were morphologically identified under a stereomicroscope, and DNA of 48 ticks (24 males and 24 females) was extracted for molecular identification by PCR amplification of the mitochondrial cytochrome C oxidase subunit 1 (COⅠ) sequence. Metagenomic sequencing of H. asiaicum was conducted by grouping the ticks according to sex. The non-redundant sequences were compared to the non-redundant protein (NR) database to analyze the composition of the microbial communities carried by the ticks. Additionally, comparisons were made with the Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes (KEGG) and the antibiotic resistance genes database (ARDB) to obtain the annotations for gene function and the antibiotic resistance functions in ticks and tick-borne pathogens. The data were analyzed using t-test. Results A total of 124 ticks were collected and morphological identification revealed that 119 were H. asiaicum adult. The PCR amplification result showed that the positive production with a length of 700 bp were amplified from tick DNA and the sequences were 99%-100% identical to H. asiaicum (Genbank: MH459386.1). After quality control filtering, a total of 469 327 812 sequence reads were obtained from metagenomic sequencing, and open reading frame prediction yielded 836 843 to 1 094 994 sequences. The NR database comparison revealed that the bacterial community abundance carried by H. asiaicum accounted for 99.13% of the total community abundance, with bacteria from 32 phyla and 2 040 species identified. The predominant phyla are Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria, accounting for 51.52% and 44.35% of the bacterial community abundance, respectively. The dominant species is Anaplasma phagocytophilum, accounting for 16.35% of the bacterial community abundance. The viral community abundance accounts for 0.004% of the total community abundance, with viruses from 5 phyla and 21 species identified. There were no significant differences in the richness and diversity of bacterial and viral communities between female and male ticks (t = -1.180、-1.729, both P > 0.05). KEGG gene function analysis revealed that the highest proportion of genes in H. asiaticum were involved in metabolism (54.38%), with the primary functional categories include amino acid metabolism, carbohydrate metabolism, and membrane transport. A total of 11 352 pathways were identified, 154 of which exhibited statistically significant differences between female and male ticks (t = -2.348, P < 0.05). ARDB analysis revealed that H. asiaticum carried 154 antibiotic resistance genes, comprising 49 different types. The major type of resistance gene was Baca (62.53%), and the main class of antibiotics was glycopeptides. The majority of resistance genes were associated with multi-drug resistance, including Mexf, Mexb, Emrd, Mexw and others. The resistance of Emrd gene in female ticks were higher than male (t = -7.558, P < 0.05). Conclusion This study revealed the major bacterial and viral communities carried by the H. asiaticum at the metagenomic level, along with multidrug resistance-related antibiotic resistance genes. Female ticks and their associated pathogens exhibited higher species richness and gene abundance.
| [1] | F?ldvári G, Szabó é, Tóth GE, et al. Emergence of Hyalomma marginatum and Hyalommarufipes adults revealed by citizen science tick monitoring in Hungary[J]. Transbound Emerg Dis, 2022, 69(5): e2240-e2248. |
| [2] | Guglielmone AA, Robbins RG, Apanaskevich DA, et al. The hard ticks of the world[M]. Berlin: Springer, 2013: 649-681. |
| [3] | Valcárcel F, González J, González MG, et al. Comparative ecology of Hyalommalusitanicum and Hyalomma marginatum Koch, 1844 (Acarina ∶ Ixodidae)[J]. Insects, 2020, 11(5): 303. |
| [4] | Hu EC, Hu ZX, Mi XY, et al. Distribution prediction of Hyalomma asiaticum (Acari ∶ Ixodidae) in a localized region in Northwestern China[J]. J Parasitol, 2022, 108(4): 330-336. |
| [5] | Yu PF, Liu ZJ, Niu QL, et al. Molecular evidence of tick-borne pathogens in Hyalomma anatolicum ticks infesting cattle in Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Northwestern China[J]. Exp Appl Acarol, 2017, 73(2): 269-281. |
| [6] | Chitimia-Dobler L, Schaper S, Rie? R, et al. Imported Hyalomma ticks in Germany in 2018[J]. Parasit Vectors, 2019, 12(1): 134. |
| [7] | Benyedem H, Lekired A, Mhadhbi M, et al. First insights into the microbiome of Tunisian Hyalomma ticks gained through next-generation sequencing with a special focus on H. scupense[J]. PLoS One, 2022, 17(5): e0268172. |
| [8] | Zakham F, Albalawi AE, Alanazi AD, et al. Viral RNA metagenomics of Hyalomma ticks collected from dromedary camels in Makkah Province, Saudi Arabia[J]. Viruses, 2021, 13(7): 1396. |
| [9] | Qviller L, Viljugrein H, Loe LE, et al. The influence of red deer space use on the distribution of Ixodes ricinus ticks in the landscape[J]. Parasit Vectors, 2016, 9(1): 545. |
| [10] | McCoy KD, Léger E, Dietrich M. Host specialization in ticks and transmission of tick-borne diseases: a review[J]. Front Cell Infect Microbiol, 2013, 3: 57. |
| [11] | Barker SC, Walker AR. Ticks of Australia. The species that infest domestic animals and humans[J]. Zootaxa, 2014(3816): 1-144. |
| [12] | Zhang Y, Liu JW, Zhang K, et al. Biological response to Przewalski’s horse reintroduction in native desert grasslands: a case study on the spatial analysis of ticks[J]. BMC Ecol Evol, 2024, 24(1): 61. |
| [13] | Almberg ES, Cross PC, Dobson AP, et al. Parasite invasion following host reintroduction: acase study of Yellowstone’s wolves[J]. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci, 2012, 367(1604): 2840-2851. |
| [14] | Zhang Y, Zhang K, Liu JW, et al. Spatial distribution and causation of Hyalomma ticks in the core area of Kalamaili Nature Reserve[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2024, 44(16): 1-13. (in Chinese) |
| (张钰, 张科, 刘佳伟, 等. 卡山保护区核心区璃眼蜱空间格局及成因分析[J]. 生态学报, 2024, 44(16): 1-13.) | |
| [15] | Bouquet J, Melgar M, Swei A, et al. Metagenomic-based surveillance of pacific coast tick Dermacentor occidentalis identifies two novel bunyaviruses and an emerging human ricksettsial pathogen[J]. Sci Rep, 2017, 7(1): 12234. |
| [16] | Garrido-Cardenas JA, Manzano-Agugliaro F. The metagenomics worldwide research[J]. Curr Genet, 2017, 63(5): 819-829. |
| [17] | Gu W, Miller S, Chiu CY. Clinical metagenomic next-generation sequencing for pathogen detection[J]. Annu Rev Pathol, 2019, 14: 319-338. |
| [18] | Ravi A, Ereqat S, Al-Jawabreh A, et al. Metagenomic profiling of ticks: identification of novel rickettsial genomes and detection of tick-borne canine parvovirus[J]. PLoS Negl Trop Dis, 2019, 13(1): e0006805. |
| [19] | Gilbert L. The impacts of climate change on ticks and tick-borne disease risk[J]. Annu Rev Entomol, 2021, 66: 373-388. |
| [20] | Deng GF. Economic entomology of China. Vol.39, Acari: Ixodidae[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 1991: 295-317. (in Chinese) |
| (邓国藩. 中国经济昆虫志. 第39册, 蜱螨亚纲?硬蜱科[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1991: 295-317.) | |
| [21] | Yu X, Ye RY, Gong ZD. The ticks fauna of Xinjiang[M]. Xinjiang Science, Technology and Public Health Press, 1997: 8-74. (in Chinese) |
| (于心, 叶瑞玉, 龚正达. 新疆蜱类志[M]. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆科技卫生出版社, 1997: 8-74.) | |
| [22] | Yang XH, Zhao YQ, Chuai X, et al. The life cycle of Hyalomma scupense (Acari ∶ Ixodidae) under laboratory conditions[J]. Ticks Tick Borne Dis, 2022, 13(6): 102019. |
| [23] | Kumar B, Manjunathachar HV, Ghosh S. A review on Hyalomma species infestations on human and animals and progress on management strategies[J]. Heliyon, 2020, 6(12): e05675. |
| [24] | Batool M, Blazier JC, Rogovska YV, et al. Metagenomic analysis of individually analyzed ticks from Eastern Europe demonstrates regional and sex-dependent differences in the microbiota of Ixodes ricinus[J]. Ticks Tick Borne Dis, 2021, 12(5): 101768. |
| [25] | Rojas-Jaimes J, Lindo-Seminario D, Correa-Nú?ez G, et al. Characterization of the bacterial microbiome of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus collected from Pecari tajacu “Sajino” Madre de Dios, Peru[J]. Sci Rep, 2021, 11(1): 6661. |
| [26] | Xiang YL, Zhou JZ, Zhang Y, et al. Metagenomic analysis of Rhipicephalus microplus from minority autonomous prefectures in Guizhou Province, China[J]. Chin J Vector Biol Control, 2023, 34(3): 319-325. (in Chinese) |
| (向昱龙, 周敬祝, 张燕, 等. 贵州省少数民族自治州微小扇头蜱的宏基因组分析[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2023, 34(3): 319-325.) | |
| [27] | Liu MC, Zhang JT, Chen JJ, et al. A global dataset of microbial community in ticks from metagenome study[J]. Sci Data, 2022, 9(1): 560. |
| [28] | Namina A, Kazarina A, Lazovska M, et al. Comparative microbiome analysis of three epidemiologically important tick species in Latvia[J]. Microorganisms, 2023, 11(8): 1970. |
| [29] | Gou HT, Xue HW, Yin H, et al. Phylogenetic study of Hyalomma spp. from China based on ITS and COⅠ genes[J]. Chin Vet Sci, 2016, 46(5): 563-567. (in Chinese) |
| (苟惠天, 薛慧文, 殷宏, 等. 基于ITS和COⅠ基因对于我国璃眼蜱的分类研究[J]. 中国兽医科学, 2016, 46(5): 563-567.) | |
| [30] | Yen YC, Kong LX, Lee L, et al. Characteristics of Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus (Xinjiang strain) in China[J]. Am J Trop Med Hyg, 1985, 34(6): 1179-1182. |
| [31] | Gui YJ, Shi S, Luo YJ, et al. Tick-borne diseases and tick control in Xinjiang[J]. Chin J Anim Infect Dis, 2023, 31(3): 213-220. (in Chinese) |
| (贵有军, 史深, 罗勇军, 等. 新疆蜱传疾病及蜱媒防制[J]. 中国动物传染病学报, 2023, 31(3): 213-220.) | |
| [32] | Milholland MT, Xu G, Rich SM, et al. Pathogen coinfections harbored by adult Ixodes scapularis from white-tailed deer compared with questing adults across sites in Maryland, USA[J]. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis, 2021, 21(2): 86-91. |
| [33] | Civitello DJ, Rynkiewicz E, Clay K. Meta-analysis of co-infections in ticks[J]. Israel J EcolEvol, 2010, 56(3/4): 417-431. |
| [34] | Obregón D, Bard E, Abrial D, et al. Sex-specific linkages between taxonomic and functional profiles of tick gut microbiomes[J]. Front Cell Infect Microbiol, 2019, 9: 298. |
| [35] | Xu XL, Han AX, Ye SQ, et al. Metagenomic analysis of microbial community structure, antibiotic resistance genes, and virulence factors of ticks captured at Wenzhou Port, Zhejiang Province, China[J]. Chin J Vector Biol Control, 2021, 32(6): 763-771. (in Chinese) |
| (许雪莲, 韩阿祥, 叶诗晴, 等. 温州口岸截获蜱体内微生物群落结构、抗生素抗性基因及毒力因子的宏基因组分析[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2021, 32(6): 763-771.) | |
| [36] | Zang S, Cao Q, Keremu A, et al. Food patch particularity and forging strategy of reintroduced Przewalski’s horse in North Xinjiang, China[J]. Turk J Zool, 2017, 41: 924-930. |
| [37] | Turghan MA, Jiang ZG, Niu ZZ. An update on status and conservation of the Przewalski’s horse (Equus ferus przewalskii): captive breeding and reintroduction projects[J]. Animals (Basel), 2022, 12(22): 3158. |
| [38] | Wang Y, Chu HJ, Han LL, et al. Factors affecting the home range of reintroduced Equus przewalskii in the Mt. Kalamaili Ungulate Nature Reserve[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2016, 36(2): 545-553. (in Chinese) |
| (王渊, 初红军, 韩丽丽, 等. 野放普氏野马(Equus przewalskii)家域面积及其影响因素[J]. 生态学报, 2016, 36(2): 545-553.) | |
| [39] | Zhang YJ, Zhang F, Cao Q, et al. Status and quality of water sources in the Kalamari Ungulate Nature Reserve: a case study in the released area of Equus przewalskii[J]. Arid Zone Res, 2014, 31(4): 665-671. (in Chinese) |
| (张永军, 张峰, 曹青, 等. 卡拉麦里山有蹄类自然保护区水源现状及水质分析: 以普氏野马放归区为例[J]. 干旱区研究, 2014, 31(4): 665-671.) | |
| [40] | Huang HQ, Zhang K, Zhang BR, et al. Analysis on the relationship between winter precipitation and the annual variation of horse stomach fly community in arid desert steppe, Northwest China (2007-2019)[J]. IntegrZool, 2022, 17(1): 128-138. |
| [41] | Zhang K, Zhang Y, Wang C, et al. Distribution characteristics of epidemic focus of Gasterophilus pecorum (Diptera ∶ Gasterophilidae) in the core habitat of released Przewalski’s horses[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2023, 43(14): 5840-5849. (in Chinese) |
| (张科, 张钰, 王臣, 等. 放归普氏野马核心区黑腹胃蝇疫源分布特点[J]. 生态学报, 2023, 43(14): 5840-5849.) | |
| [42] | Harrus S, Baneth G. Drivers for the emergence and re-emergence of vector-borne protozoal and bacterial diseases[J]. Int J Parasitol, 2005, 35(11/12): 1309-1318. |
| [43] | Young TP. Restoration ecology and conservation biology[J]. Biol Conserv, 2000, 92(1): 73-83. |
| [44] | Xia CJ, Cao J, Zhang HF, et al. Reintroduction of Przewalski’s horse (Equus ferus przewalskii) in Xinjiang, China: the status and experience[J]. Biol Conserv, 2014, 177: 142-147. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |