收稿日期: 2024-01-02
修回日期: 2024-01-24
网络出版日期: 2024-04-22
基金资助
国家自然科学基金(81703281);甘肃省卫生行业科研计划(GSWSKY2017-19);国家卫生健康委包虫病防治研究重点实验室开放课题(2021WZK1006);中国疾病预防控制中心寄生虫病预防控制所科技创新支撑计划(TF2024005)
Assessment of the quality of life of patients with echinococcosis in Gansu Province pre- and post-surgery based on the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire
Received date: 2024-01-02
Revised date: 2024-01-24
Online published: 2024-04-22
Supported by
National Natural Science Foundation of China(81703281);Gansu Province Health Industry Scientific Research Plan Project(GSWSKY2017-19);NHC Key Laboratory of Echinococcosis Prevention and Control, China(2021WZK1006);Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Institute of Parasitic Diseases Prevention and Control, Science and Technology Innovation Support Program(TF2024005)
目的 分析甘肃省棘球蚴病患者手术前后生命质量的变化,评价手术治疗措施对患者生命质量的影响。方法 调查甘肃省中央转移支付地方棘球蚴病防治项目县中纳入项目管理并进行手术的棘球蚴病患者,采用调查问卷和EQ-5D-5L量表收集患者基本情况、首诊情况、手术情况和手术前后的生命质量情况。用SPSS 19.0、Origin 2021软件对数据进行统计学分析。结果 共收集病例856例,其中男性417例,女性439例。年龄最小为7岁,最大为85岁,平均为53岁。CE患者737例,AE患者14例,未分型患者105例。棘球蚴病患者首次手术术后时间最长的为17.5年,最短的为1个月;调查时间与首次手术时间的平均时间间隔为7.4年(89个月)。棘球蚴病患者手术前后的健康效用值分别为0.910 ± 0.142和0.967 ± 0.067,术后较术前提高了6.3%(Z = -12.081,P < 0.05);患者手术前后的视觉模拟标尺(VAS)评分分别为(79.10 ± 16.00)和(86.25 ± 11.64)分,术后较术前提高了9.0%(Z = -15.292,P < 0.05)。棘球蚴病患者的健康效用值差值和VAS评分差值的取值范围分别为[-0.308,1.348]和[-55,90]。42.8%(366/856)的棘球蚴病患者手术后健康效用值增加,62.7%(537/856)的患者手术后VAS评分增加。五维度困难程度减轻的占19.1%(818/4 280);困难程度不变的占76.5%(3 275/4 280),整体健康状况不变组患者的术前健康效用值和VAS评分均高于其他组(Z = -16.580、-8.606,P < 0.05);困难程度加重的占4.4%(187/4 280),健康效用值下降组患者的首次手术年龄高于其他组(Z = 4.393,P < 0.05);VAS评分下降组患者的首次手术年龄高于其他组(Z = 3.154,P < 0.05)。趋势性检验结果显示,患者的健康效用值(F = 12.957,Ptrend < 0.05)和VAS评分(F = 10.808,Ptrend < 0.05)均与术后呈线性正相关趋势。结论 手术治疗措施可改善棘球蚴病患者的生命质量。
关键词: 棘球蚴病; EQ-5D-5L量表; 手术患者; 生命质量; 甘肃省
刘泽航 , 张小娟 , 杨国兵 , 雷家希 , 刘白雪 , 王莹 , 王芝依 , 王东 , 冯宇 , 王立英 . 基于EQ-5D-5L量表的甘肃省棘球蚴病患者手术前后生命质量研究[J]. 中国寄生虫学与寄生虫病杂志, 2024 , 42(2) : 182 -190 . DOI: 10.12140/j.issn.1000-7423.2024.02.008
Objective To analyse the changes in quality of life of patients with echinococcosis in Gansu Province pre- and post-surgery, and evaluate the impact of surgical treatments on the patients’ quality of life. Methods The patients with echinococcosis underwent surgery and were managed under the National Project for Echinococcosis Control and Prevention in Gansu Province were surveyed using questionnaire and EQ-5D-5L questionnaire to collect basic information, first visit record, surgical performance, and the quality of life pre- and post-surgery. The data were analyzed by SPSS 19.0 and Origin 2021. Results A total of 856 cases collected, including 417 males and 439 females. The age ranges from 7 to 85 years, with an average of 53 years. There were 737 cases of CE patients, 14 cases of AE patients, and 105 cases of unclassified patients. The longest time from the first surgery to postoperative follow-up for patients with echinococcosis was 17.5 years, and the shortest was 1 month. The average time interval between the investigation and the first surgery was 7.4 years (89 months). The preoperative and postoperative health utility values for patients with echinococcosis were 0.910 ± 0.142 and 0.967 ± 0.067, respectively, showing a 6.3% improvement postsurgery (Z = -12.081, P < 0.05). The preoperative and postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) scores were 79.10 ± 16.00 and 86.25 ± 11.64, respectively, showing a 9.0% improvement postsurgery (Z = -15.292, P < 0.05). The health utility value difference in patients with echinococcosis ranged between -0.308 and 1.348, the VAS score difference ranged between -55 and 90. A total of 42.8% (366/856) patients had an increase in health utility value postsurgery, and 62.7% (537/856) of patients had an increase in VAS score postsurgery. The proportion of patients with reduction of difficulties in the five dimensions was 19.1% (818/4 280), unchanged was 76.5% (3 275/4 280), and those with stable overall health had higher health utility values (Z = -16.580, P < 0.05) and VAS scores (Z = -8.606, P < 0.05). The proportion of patients with increased difficulties was 4.4% (187/4 280), the average age of first operation in the group with decreased health utility value was higher than that in another group (Z = 4.393, P < 0.05). The average age of first operation in the group with decreased VAS score was higher than that in another group (Z = 3.154, P < 0.05). The patients’ health utility value (F = 12.957, Ptrend < 0.05) and VAS score (F = 10.808, Ptrend < 0.05) showed a trend of positive linear correlation with the extension of postsurgery time. Conclusion Surgical treatment could impact the quality of life for patients with echinococcosis.
| [1] | Wu WP, Wang H, Wang Q, et al. A nationwide sampling survey on echinococcosis in China during 2012—2016[J]. Chin J Parasitol Parasit Dis, 2018, 36(1): 1-14. (in Chinese) |
| (伍卫平, 王虎, 王谦, 等. 2012—2016年中国棘球蚴病抽样调查分析[J]. 中国寄生虫学与寄生虫病杂志, 2018, 36(1): 1-14.) | |
| [2] | Craig PS, McManus DP, Lightowlers MW, et al. Prevention and control of cystic echinococcosis[J]. Lancet Infect Dis, 2007, 7(6): 385-394. |
| [3] | Wen H, Vuitton L, Tuxun T, et al. Echinococcosis: advances in the 21st century[J]. Clin Microbiol Rev, 2019, 32(2): e00075-18. |
| [4] | World Health Organization. Study protocol for the World Health Organization project to develop a Quality of Life assessment instrument (WHOQOL)[J]. Qual Life Res, 1993, 2(2): 153-159. |
| [5] | Herdman M, Gudex C, Lloyd A, et al. Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L)[J]. Qual Life Res, 2011, 20(10): 1727-1736. |
| [6] | EuroQol Group. EuroQol: a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life[J]. Health Policy, 1990, 16(3): 199-208. |
| [7] | Luo N, Liu G, Li MH, et al. Estimating an EQ-5D-5L value set for China[J]. Value Health, 2017, 20(4): 662-669. |
| [8] | Liu R, Zhang JF, Yan XL, et al. Comparative study of SF-36 and EQ-5D-5L in evaluating quality of life for patients with advanced schistosomiasis[J]. Chin J Parasitol Parasit Dis, 2021, 39(5): 639-646. (in Chinese) |
| (刘蓉, 张剑锋, 严晓岚, 等. SF-36和EQ-5D-5L量表在晚期血吸虫病患者生命质量评价中的比较研究[J]. 中国寄生虫学与寄生虫病杂志, 2021, 39(5): 639-646.) | |
| [9] | Mu QM, He W, Hou GM, et al. Comparative analysis of clinical curative effect and postoperative complications of laparoscopic and open surgery in patients with hepatic echinococcosis[J]. J Hunan Norm Univ Med Sci, 2018, 15(4): 14-17. (in Chinese) |
| (母齐鸣, 贺伟, 侯桂敏, 等. 腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗肝包虫病患者的临床疗效及术后并发症对比分析[J]. 湖南师范大学学报(医学版), 2018, 15(4): 14-17.) | |
| [10] | Khachatryan AS. Analysis of lethality in echinococcal disease[J]. Korean J Parasitol, 2017, 55(5): 549-553. |
| [11] | Guo M, Tuerganaili AJ, Ran B, et al. Analysis on the quality of life of hydatid patients in a hospital of Xinjiang[J]. Xinjiang Med J, 2019, 49(7): 671-675. (in Chinese) |
| (郭敏, 吐尔干艾力?阿吉, 冉博, 等. 新疆某医院包虫病手术患者生存质量状况分析[J]. 新疆医学, 2019, 49(7): 671-675.) | |
| [12] | Tian T. Investigation on disease burden of echinococcosis in high endemicity areas of Qinghai-Tibet Plateau[D]. Beijing: Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, 2018: 24-29. (in Chinese) |
| (田添. 青藏高原重点地区棘球蚴病的疾病负担研究[D]. 北京: 中国疾病预防控制中心, 2018: 24-29.) | |
| [13] | Santivanez SJ, Arce M, Valcarcel M, et al. Lung and liver cystic echinococcosis factors associated with health-related quality of life after surgical treatment[J]. Am J Trop Med Hyg, 2017, 97(5): 149. |
| [14] | Chinese Doctor Association,Chinese College of Surgeons (CCS), Chinese Committee for Hadytidology (CCH). Expert consensus on diagnosis and treatment of hepatic cystic and alveolar echinococcosis (2019 edition)[J]. Chin J Dig Surg, 2019, 18(8): 711-721. (in Chinese) |
| (中国医师协会外科医师分会包虫病外科专业委员会. 肝两型包虫病诊断与治疗专家共识(2019版)[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2019, 18(8): 711-721.) | |
| [15] | Nikendei C, Greinacher A, Berkunova A, et al. Psychological burden and resilience factors in patients with alveolar echinococcosis: a cross-sectional study[J]. PLoS Negl Trop Dis, 2019, 13(1): e0007082. |
| [16] | Liao LJ, Peng SZ, Feng GJ, et al. Psychological analysis and nursing care of 80 patients with hepatic echinococcosis[J]. Nurs J Chin PLA, 2004, 21(9): 94-95. (in Chinese) |
| (廖丽娟, 彭顺舟, 冯国君, 等. 肝包虫病患者80例心理分析及护理[J]. 解放军护理杂志, 2004, 21(9): 94-95.) | |
| [17] | Velasco-Tirado V, Alonso-Sardón M, Lopez-Bernus A, et al. Medical treatment of cystic echinococcosis: systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. BMC Infect Dis, 2018, 18(1): 306. |
| [18] | McManus DP, Gray DJ, Zhang WB, et al. Diagnosis, treatment, and management of echinococcosis[J]. BMJ, 2012, 344: e3866. |
| [19] | Schmidberger J, Steinbach J, Schlingeloff P, et al. Surgery versus conservative drug therapy in alveolar echinococcosis patients in Germany: a health-related quality of life comparison[J]. Food Waterborne Parasitol, 2019, 16: e00057. |
| [20] | Wang LY, Qin M, Liu ZH, et al. Prevalence and spatial distribution characteristics of human echinococcosis in China[J]. PLoS Negl Trop Dis, 2021, 15(12): e0009996. |
| [21] | Qin M, Wang LY, Wang Y, et al. Investigation on the management for patients with echinococcosis treated with albendazole: three PLADs, China, 2019[J]. China CDC Wkly, 2023, 5(20): 437-441. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |