目的 了解全国疾病预防控制机构（简称疾控机构）重点寄生虫病防治队伍建设现状、技术需求，并提出针对性改进建议。方法 采用线上问卷调查方式，对全国省、市、县级疾控机构和寄生虫病/血吸虫病防治机构开展寄生虫病防治专业人员基本情况、实验室检测能力、技术培训及队伍建设需求等调查，使用SPSS 26.0统计学软件进行统计分析。结果 共有1 855个省、市、县级疾控机构参与调查，在岗人员共122 282人，其中参与寄生虫病防治工作的人员（简称寄防人员）共计8 943人，占全部在岗人员的7.31%（8 943/122 282）；专职寄防人员4 745人，占寄防人员的53.06%（4 745/8 943）。参与调查的疾控机构中，东部地区高级职称及研究生学历占比（19.92%、13.52%）均高于中部（17.02%、8.29%）和西部（13.88%、8.25%）地区（χ² = 1 063.60、 2 892.89, P < 0.01）；东部地区寄防人员高级职称及研究生学历占比（21.20%、12.51%）也高于中部（15.63%、7.30%）和西部（11.62%、6.57%）地区（χ² = 142.19、314.93，均P < 0.01）。各级疾控机构寄防人员日常工作侧重不同，近一年开展的对下一级寄生虫病防治业务培训2 207次，省级机构平均2.7次，地市级平均1.4次，县级平均1.1次。省、市、县3级分别有12.50%（4/32）、34.02%（83/244）和49.02%（774/1 579）的疾控机构未设有寄生虫病专用实验室。在血吸虫病、棘球蚴病和内脏利什曼病重点流行省（直辖市、自治区），掌握各病种检测能力的机构占比分别为55.90%（398/712）、40.22%（218/542）和14.55%（117/804），均高于非流行省（直辖市、自治区）（29.83%、7.77%、6.95%）（χ² = 124.36、 283.05、 28.67，均P < 0.01）。各级疾控机构对寄生虫病防治工作需求相对集中在人员业务培训（34.61%，642/1 855）、诊断检测技术（12.40%，230/1 855）和经费设备投入（5.44%，101/1 855）等方面。结论 全国疾控机构寄生虫病防治能力不平衡，应继续优化寄生虫病防治人员结构、加强业务培训和实验室检测能力建设，为控制和消除寄生虫病提供人才队伍保障。

Objective To understand the current situation of capacitity building in team development and technical needs and to propose pertinent improvement suggestion for key parasitic disease control in the centers for disease control and prevention (CDC) at all levels in China. Methods An on-line questionnaire survey was performed to collect information on the professional staff structure, technique training, laboratory testing capability, and technology needs for parasitic disease control in the CDCs and schistosomioasis control institutions at all levels. The data was analyzed using SPSS 26.0 software. Results A total of 1 855 (provincial, municipal and county) CDCs participated in the survey. Among 122 282 technicians on duty, 7.31% (8 493/122 282) were responsible for parasitic disease control. A total of 4 745 are full-time, accounting for 53.06% (4 745/8 943) of all staff working on parasite disease control. There were significant differences in the distribution of professional titles and educational levels among employees working in CDCs. Higher proportions of senior professional titles and postgraduate degrees were found in the eastern region (19.92%, 13.52%) than in the central (17.02%, 8.29%) and western region (13.88%, 8.25%) (χ² = 1 063.60, 2 892.89;both P < 0.01). The proportion of senior professional titles and postgraduate education among the personnel involved in parasitic disease prevention and control were also higher in the eastern region (21.20%, 12.51%) compared to the central region (15.63%, 7.30%) and western region (11.62%, 6.57%) (χ² = 142.19, 314.93; both P < 0.01). The daily tasks of disease control agency staff at all levels have varying emphases. During the past year, 2 207 technical trainings were given to subordinate CDCs. On average, each individual at provincial CDCs has taken 2.7 training courses, each individual at city-level CDCs has taken 1.4 training courses, and each individual at county-level CDCs has taken 1.1 training courses. There were 12.50% (4/32) of province-level CDCs, 34.02% (83/244) of city-level CDCs and 49.02% (774/1 579) of county-level CDCs without specific laboratories for parasitic diseases. 55.90% (398/712), 40.22% (218/542) and 14.55% (117/804) of CDCs performed the ability for diagnosis of schistosomiasis, echinococcosis and visceral leishmaniasis in provinces where the disease is endemic, and the proportions were higher than those in non-endemic provinces （29.83%, 7.77%, 6.95%）(χ² = 124.36, 283.05, 28.67; all P < 0.01). In addition, the requirements of CDCs mainly focused on personnel training (34.61%, 642/1 855), diagnosing and testing technology (12.40%, 230/1 855), and financial and equipment inputs (5.44%, 101/1 855). Conclusion The CDCs at all levels in the country show capability imbalance in parasitic disease control. Therefore, it is imperative to continuously optimize personnel structure, strengthen professional training and capacity building for laboratory testing, ensuring adequate personnel support for the control and elimination of parasitic diseases.