论著

2015—2019年河南省不同诊断机构疟原虫检测能力评价

  • 李素华 ,
  • 纪鹏慧 ,
  • 周瑞敏 ,
  • 贺志权 ,
  • 钱丹 ,
  • 杨成运 ,
  • 刘颖 ,
  • 鲁德领 ,
  • 王昊 ,
  • 张红卫 ,
  • 赵玉玲
展开
  • 河南省疾病预防控制中心,河南省传染病病原学重点实验室,郑州 450016
李素华(1988-),女,硕士研究生,主管技师,主要从事寄生虫病防治和研究工作。E-mail: lsh0427@163.com
*赵玉玲(1968-),女,硕士,主任技师,主要从事结核病和寄生虫病防治工作。E-mail: 819482937@qq.com

收稿日期: 2021-03-30

  修回日期: 2022-04-23

  网络出版日期: 2021-06-18

基金资助

2019年度河南省医学科技攻关计划联合共建项目(LHGJ20190706);河南省医学科技攻关联合共建项目(2018020515);河南省科技攻关项目(182102310631);河南省卫生与计划生育科技创新人才项目(51282)

Appraisal of diagnosis capacity of malaria reference laboratories in Henan Province during 2015—2019

  • LI Su-hua ,
  • JI Peng-hui ,
  • ZHOU Rui-min ,
  • HE Zhi-quan ,
  • QIAN Dan ,
  • YANG Cheng-yun ,
  • LIU Ying ,
  • LU De-ling ,
  • WANG Hao ,
  • ZHANG Hong-wei ,
  • ZHAO Yu-ling
Expand
  • Henan Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Zhengzhou 450016, China
*E-mail: 819482937@qq.com

Received date: 2021-03-30

  Revised date: 2022-04-23

  Online published: 2021-06-18

Supported by

Joint Project of Medical Science and Technology of Henan Province, 2019(LHGJ20190706);Joint Project of Medical Science and Technology of Henan Province(2018020515);Science and Technology of Henan Province (182102310631)(182102310631);Technology Innovation Talents Project of Henan Health and Family Planning(51282)

摘要

目的 分析河南省疟疾诊断参比实验室对各级诊断机构上报的疟疾病例血样进行复核的结果,评价各级诊断机构的疟疾检测能力。 方法 收集2015—2019年河南省疟疾病例和疑似疟疾病例的血涂片、全血样品以及病例的诊断单位、诊断结果等资料,省级疟疾参比实验室通过镜检、RDT和PCR等3种方法对血样进行复核检测,分析检测结果、虫种误判情况以及各级诊断机构阳性符合及虫种误判情况。不同诊断机构的阳性符合率和误判率采用χ2检验进行统计学分析。 结果 2015—2019年河南省疟疾诊断参比实验室共收集1 194份疟疾样品,经3种方法复核检测共确诊阳性1 078份(90.3%),阴性116份(9.7%)。PCR、RDT、镜检阳性符合率分别为98.7%(1 064/1 078)、96.9%(1 045/1 078)、89.1%(960/1 078)。镜检和PCR检测结果一致的样品934份,其中恶性疟711份、间日疟58份、三日疟32份、卵形疟133份。2015—2019年虫种误判率总体呈下降趋势,分别为12.4%(25/202)、12.2%(28/230)、7.3%(15/206)、11.3%(27/239)和5.4%(17/317);恶性疟原虫、间日疟原虫、卵形疟原虫、三日疟原虫、混合感染、诺氏疟原虫误判率分别为3.7%(30/820)、23.4%(15/64)、39.9%(59/148)、34.3%(12/35)、9/10、1/1。疾病预防控制机构(疾控机构)、医疗机构和其他机构诊断的疟疾病例分别占23.7%(283/1 194)、74.5%(890/1 194)、1.8%(21/1 194)。疾控机构诊断的283例病例中,省、市、县(区)级疾控机构阳性符合率分别为9/9、93.2%(69/674)、91%(182/200),差异无统计学意义(χ2 = 0.438,P > 0.05);虫种误判率分别为1/9、20.3%(14/69)、11.5%(21/182),差异无统计学意义(χ2 = 3.271,P < 0.05)。医疗机构诊断的890例病例中,省、市、县(区)、乡(镇)医疗机构阳性符合率分别81.0%(17/21)、91.7%(742/809)、92.2%(47/51)、6/9,差异有统计学意义(χ2 = 55.392,P < 0.05);虫种误判率分别为7/17、10.9%(81/742)、10.6%(5/47)、1/6,差异有统计学意义(χ2 = 11.978,P < 0.05)。 结论 河南省疟疾病例的诊断单位主要为医疗机构,各级疟疾实验室检测能力总体较高,应继续加强对医疗机构疟疾检测人员的培训,维持疟疾较高的检测能力。

关键词: 疟疾; 检测能力; 评价; 河南

本文引用格式

李素华 , 纪鹏慧 , 周瑞敏 , 贺志权 , 钱丹 , 杨成运 , 刘颖 , 鲁德领 , 王昊 , 张红卫 , 赵玉玲 . 2015—2019年河南省不同诊断机构疟原虫检测能力评价[J]. 中国寄生虫学与寄生虫病杂志, 2022 , 40(6) : 748 -753 . DOI: 10.12140/j.issn.1000-7423.2022.06.009

Abstract

Objective To analyze the rechecking results of the reference laboratory for malaria diagnosis in Henan Province on malaria blood samples submitted by malaria diagnosis institutions at all levels and evaluate the malaria detection capacity of malaria diagnosis institutions in Henan Province. Methods Blood smears and whole blood samples, and the diagnosis institute information, diagnosis results and other information on the malaria cases and suspected malaria cases were collected in Henan Province from 2015 to 2019. The provincial malaria reference laboratory rechecked and tested the blood samples through three methods, including microscopy, rapid diagnostic test (RDT) and PCR, and analyzed the detection results, the misjudgment of worm species, and the positive coincidence and misjudgment of worm species in diagnostic institutions at all levels. The positive coincidence rate and misdiagnosis rate of different diagnostic institutions were analyzed by χ2 test. Results From 2015 to 2019, the Malaria Diagnostic Reference Laboratory of Henan Province received a total of 1 194 malaria samples, of which 1 078 samples (90.3%) were confirmed positive, and 116 negative (9.7%) by using the three testing methods. The positive coincidence rate by PCR, RDT and microscopy was 98.7% (1 064/1 078), 96.9% (1 045/1 078) and 89.1% (960/1 078), respectively. A total of 934 samples had the same results between microscopy and PCR, among them, 711 were falciparum malaria, 58 vivax malaria, 32 quartan malaria and 133 ovale malaria. From 2015 to 2019, the rate of species misidentification showed a decreasing trend, which were 12.4% (25/202), 12.2% (28/230), 7.3% (15/206), 11.3% (27/239), and 5.4% (17/317), respectively. The misdiagnosis rates of Plasmodium falciparum, P. vivax, P. ovale, P. malariae, mixed infection and P. knowlesi were 3.7% (30/820), 23.4% (15/64), 39.9% (59/148), 34.3% (12/35), 9/10 and 1/1, respectively. The malaria cases diagnosed by disease prevention and control institutions (CDC), medical institutions and other institutions accounted for 23.7% (283/1 194), 74.5% (890/1 194) and 1.8% (21/1 194) respectively. Among the 283 cases diagnosed by disease control institutions, the positive coincidence rates of provincial, municipal and county (district) level disease control institutions were 9/9, 93.2% (69/674) and 91% (182/200), respectively, with no significant difference (χ2 = 0.438, P > 0.05). The error rate of Plasmodium species was 1/9, 20.3% (14/69) and 11.5% (21/182) respectively, with no significant difference (χ2 = 3.271, P < 0.05). Among 890 cases diagnosed by medical institutions, the positive coincidence rates of provincial, municipal, county (district) and township (town) medical institutions were 81.0% (17/21), 91.7% (742/809), 92.2% (47/51) and 6/9 respectively, with a statistically significant difference (χ2 = 55.392, P < 0.05); the misdiagnosis rate of Plasmodium species was 7/17, 10.9% (81/742), 10.6% (5/47) and 1/6 respectively, with statistical significance (χ2 = 11.978, P < 0.05). Conclusion The local settings for diagnosis units of malaria cases in Henan Province are mainly medical institutions, and the detection capacity of malaria laboratories at all levels is generally high. It is imperative to continuously strengthen. The training for malaria diagnosis professionals in medical institutions to maintain the higher capacity of malaria diagnosis.

参考文献

[1] World Health Organization. World malaria report 2022[R]. Geneva: WHO, 2022: 22-23.
[2] Yang CY, Qian D, Lu DL, et al. Epidemiological analysis of malaria in Henan Province during 2016—2018[J]. Chin J Parasitol Parasit Dis, 2019, 37(5): 619-622. (in Chinese)
  (杨成运, 钱丹, 鲁德领, 等. 2016—2018年河南省疟疾疫情分析[J]. 中国寄生虫学与寄生虫病杂志, 2019, 37(5): 619-622.)
[3] Tang LH. Diagnosis, treatment and management of imported malaria cases[M]. Shanghai: Shanghai Scientific & Technical Publishers, 2010: 70-73. (in Chinese)
  (汤林华. 输入性疟疾的诊治与管理[M]. 上海: 上海科学技术出版社, 2010: 70-73.)
[4] Li M, Xia ZG, Tang LH. Overviews on Plasmodium ovale wallikeri and its genetic detection system[J]. Chin J Parasitol Parasit Dis, 2014, 32(1): 64-67. (in Chinese)
  (李美, 夏志贵, 汤林华. 卵形疟原虫wallikeri亚种及其基因检测体系的研究进展[J]. 中国寄生虫学与寄生虫病杂志, 2014, 32(1): 64-67.)
[5] National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China. Diagnosis of malaria. Health industry standard of the People’s Republic of China (WS259—2015)[S]. Beijing: China Standards Press, 2015: 1-12. (in Chinese)
  (中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会. 疟疾的诊断. 中华人民共和国卫生行业标准(WS259—2015)[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2015: 1-12.)
[6] Zhou RM, Li SH, Gao LJ, et al. Diagnosis and analysis of the first imported case of Plasmodium knowlesi infection in Henan Province[J]. J Zhengzhou Univ Med Sci, 2018, 53(5): 610-613. (in Chinese)
  周瑞敏, 李素华, 高丽君, 等. 河南省首例输入性诺氏疟的诊断和分析[J]. 郑州大学学报(医学版), 2018, 53(5): 610-613.)
[7] Berry A, Fabre R, Benoit-Vical F, et al. Contribution of PCR-based methods to diagnosis and management of imported malaria[J]. Med Trop (Mars), 2005, 65(2): 176-183.
[8] Wang JZ, Li XS, Yin SQ, et al. Comparison on application of microscopy, RDT and PCR to malaria diagnosis[J]. J Trop Dis Parasitol, 2020, 18(1): 46-48, 58. (in Chinese)
  (王加志, 李希尚, 尹授钦, 等. 镜检、抗原检测和核酸检测方法在疟疾诊断中的应用比较[J]. 热带病与寄生虫学, 2020, 18(1): 46-48, 58.)
[9] Tanizaki R, Kato Y, Iwagami M, et al. Performance of rapid diagnostic tests for Plasmodium ovale malaria in Japanese travellers[J]. Trop Med Health, 2014, 42(4): 149-153.
[10] Yerlikaya S, Campillo A, Gonzalez IJ. A systematic review: Performance of rapid diagnostic tests for the detection of Plasmodium knowlesi, Plasmodium malariae, and Plasmodium ovale monoinfections in human blood[J]. J Infect Dis, 2018, 218(2): 265-276.
[11] Berzosa P, de Lucio A, Romay-Barja M, et al. Comparison of three diagnostic methods (microscopy, RDT, and PCR) for the detection of malaria parasites in representative samples from Equatorial Guinea[J]. Malar J, 2018, 17(1): 333.
[12] Johnston SP, Pieniazek NJ, Xayavong MV, et al. PCR as a confirmatory technique for laboratory diagnosis of malaria[J]. J Clin Microbiol, 2006, 44(3): 1087-1089.
[13] Wang JZ, Feng J, Li XS, et al. Analysis of imported malaria in Tengchong City, Yunnan Province during 2016—2019[J]. Chin J Parasitol Parasit Dis, 2020, 38(4): 435-439. (in Chinese)
  (王加志, 丰俊, 李希尚, 等. 2016—2019年云南省腾冲市输入性疟疾疫情分析[J]. 中国寄生虫学与寄生虫病杂志, 2020, 38(4): 435-439.)
[14] Zhang L, Feng J, Tu H, et al. Challenges in malaria elimination: the epidemiological characteristics of Plasmodium vivax in China from 2011 to 2018[J]. Chin J Parasitol Parasit Dis, 2019, 37(5): 532-538. (in Chinese)
  (张丽, 丰俊, 涂宏, 等. 消除疟疾的挑战: 2011—2018年全国间日疟疫情分析[J]. 中国寄生虫学与寄生虫病杂志, 2019, 37(5): 532-538.)
[15] Zhu GD, Cao J. Progress and challenges of global malaria elimination[J]. Chin J Schisto Control, 2019, 31(1): 19-22, 52. (in Chinese)
  (朱国鼎, 曹俊. 全球消除疟疾进展及面临的挑战[J]. 中国血吸虫病防治杂志, 2019, 31(1): 19-22, 52.)
[16] Wu K, Chen F, Xu MX, et al. Epidemic situation of imported malaria and diagnostic capabilities of medical institutions in Wuhan City from 2008 to 2017[J]. Chin J Schisto Control, 2018, 30(3): 289-294. (in Chinese)
  (吴凯, 陈芳, 徐明星, 等. 2008—2017年武汉市境外输入性疟疾疫情及诊断能力分析[J]. 中国血吸虫病防治杂志, 2018, 30(3): 289-294.)
[17] Yang WZ, Zhou XN. New challenges of malaria elimination in China[J]. Chin J Prev Med, 2016, 50(4): 289-291. (in Chinese)
  (杨维中, 周晓农. 中国在疟疾消除阶段面临的新挑战[J]. 中华预防医学杂志, 2016, 50(4): 289-291.)
文章导航

/

〈 〉