论著

2021年宁夏多房棘球蚴病流行区犬和野外宿主感染情况

  • 吴向林 ,
  • 闫芳 ,
  • 段红菊 ,
  • 齐蓉婷 ,
  • 马天波 ,
  • 高建炜
展开
  • 宁夏疾病预防控制中心,银川 750004
吴向林(1980-),男,本科,副主任医师,从事寄生虫病预防控制与研究。E-mail:545126419@qq.com
*闫芳(1987-),女,硕士,主管医师,从事寄生虫病预防控制与研究。E-mail:243947179@qq.com

收稿日期: 2022-04-09

  修回日期: 2022-07-01

  网络出版日期: 2022-12-16

基金资助

宁夏自然科学基金(2021AAC03416)

Echinococcus multilocularis infection in dogs and other wild hosts in endemic area of Ningxia in 2021

  • WU Xiang-lin ,
  • YAN Fang ,
  • DUAN Hong-ju ,
  • QI Rong-ting ,
  • MA Tian-bo ,
  • GAO Jian-wei
Expand
  • Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Yinchuan 750004, China
*E-mail: 243947179@qq.com

Received date: 2022-04-09

  Revised date: 2022-07-01

  Online published: 2022-12-16

Supported by

Ningxia Natural Science Foundation(2021AAC03416)

摘要

目的 了解宁夏多房棘球蚴病流行区犬和野外宿主感染情况。 方法 采用随机抽样方法,于2021年在有多房棘球蚴病流行的西吉县、原州区和海原县各抽取16个村作为调查点。在调查村垃圾投放点半径100 m范围内采集流浪犬粪样,同时采集调查村家犬粪样。在每个县自然林场的外围采集狐狸、狼等野外终宿主粪样。采用ELISA检测家犬、流浪犬、狐狸、狼等粪样的棘球绦虫抗原,并计算粪抗原阳性率。以调查村外围住户为起点向外延伸1 km范围捕捉野鼠,在调查村居民室内捕捉家鼠,鉴定后解剖,查找肝、肺、腹腔等脏器的囊状物、包块或结节等疑似病灶,制备疑似病灶组织切片,苏木精-伊红染色后显微镜下观察原头节,并计算鼠感染率。采用SPSS19.0软件进行统计分析,粪抗原阳性率、感染率差异的比较采用χ2检验。 结果 宁夏西吉县、原州区和海原县共检测流浪犬粪样1 554份、家犬粪样2 567份,粪棘球绦虫抗原阳性率分别为4.76%(74/1 554)、0.97%(25/2 567),二者差异有统计学意义(χ2 = 59.23,P < 0.05)。其中,西吉县、海原县、原州区流浪犬粪抗原阳性率分别为6.51%(31/507)、3.48%(18/517)、4.34%(23/530),均高于家犬的1.30%(11/843)、0.70%(6/859)、0.92%(2/217)(χ2 = 27.17、14.58、17.62,均P < 0.05)。共捕获鼠类7种649只,鼠类多房棘球蚴感染率为0.62%(4/649),检出感染多房棘球蚴的4只鼠均为阿拉善黄鼠。阿拉善黄鼠多房棘球蚴感染率为1.09%(4/366),其中西吉县阿拉善黄鼠多房棘球蚴感染率为2.31%(3/130)、原州区为0.86%(1/116),两县(区)感染率之间差异无统计学意义(χ2 = 0.77,P > 0.05),海原县未检出阳性鼠。各调查点阿拉善黄鼠的密度为3.02~11.48只/hm2(1 hm2 = 10 000 m2)。3个县(区)共采集狐狸、狼等野外终宿主粪样252份,粪棘球绦虫抗原阳性率为1.19%(3/252)。抗原阳性的粪样均为狐狸粪样,狐狸粪样阳性率为2.61%(3/115),其中西吉县狐狸粪样阳性率为3.92%(2/51)、原州区为2.78%(1/36),两县(区)感染率之间差异无统计学意义(χ2 = 0.08,P > 0.05),海原县未检出阳性狐狸粪样。 结论 宁夏流浪犬、狐狸粪棘球绦虫抗原阳性率较高,中间宿主阿拉善黄鼠有多房棘球蚴感染,提示多房棘球蚴流行循环链依然存在,应加强流浪犬等野外宿主的调查研究与管理驱虫工作。

本文引用格式

吴向林 , 闫芳 , 段红菊 , 齐蓉婷 , 马天波 , 高建炜 . 2021年宁夏多房棘球蚴病流行区犬和野外宿主感染情况[J]. 中国寄生虫学与寄生虫病杂志, 2022 , 40(6) : 717 -722 . DOI: 10.12140/j.issn.1000-7423.2022.06.004

Abstract

Objective To understand the infection of dogs and wild animal hosts in alveolar echinococcosis endemic areas in Ningxia. Methods In 2021, 16 villages were randomly selected as investigation sites from Xiji County, Yuanzhou District and Haiyuan County, respectively, in the endemic area of alveolar echinococcosis. Feces of stray dogs were collected within 100 meters radius of the garbage drop points in the survey villages, meantime, domestic dogs were also collected from the villages. Feces from wild definitive hosts such as foxes and wolves were collected around the natural forest farm in each county. ELISA was used to detect Echinococcus antigens in the fecal samples of domestic dogs, stray dogs, foxes and wolves. Wild rats were captured within an area statting from the households outside the village, extending outwards for 1 km radius. Domestic rats were captured indoors in the households of the survey villages. After identification, the rats were dissected to examine the suspected lesions, including cysts, masses or nodules in the liver, lung, abdominal cavity and other organs, and tissue sections of suspected lesions were prepared to identify the protoscoleces microscopically after staining with hematoxylin-eosin. The infection rate of rats was calculated. SPSS19.0 software was used for statistical analysis, and the difference between the fecal antigen-positive rate and infection rate was compared by χ2 examination. Results A total of 1 554 stray dogs and 2 567 domestic dogs were investigated in Xiji County, Yuanzhou District and Haiyuan County, and the positive rates of Echinococcus coproantigen were 4.76% (74/1 554) and 0.97% (25/2 567), respectively. The difference was statistically significant (χ2 = 59.23, P < 0.05). The positive rates of Echinococcus coproantigen in stray dogs from Xiji County, Haiyuan County and Yuanzhou District were 6.51% (31/507), 3.48% (18/517) and 4.34% (23/530), respectively; which were higher than that of domestic dogs [1.30% (11/843), 0.70% (6/859) and 0.92% (2/217)] (χ2 = 27.17, 14.58, 17.62; all P < 0.05). A total of 649 rodents were captured, which belong to 7 species. The infection rate of E. multilocularis cyst was 0.62% (4/649). The four rodents infected with E. multilocularis were all Spermophilcus alashanicus. The infection rate of E. multilocularis cyst in Sp. alashanicus was 1.09% (4/366). The infection rate of E. multilocularis cyst was 2.31% (3/130) in Xiji County and 0.86% (1/116) in Yuanzhou District, with no significant difference between the two counties (χ2 = 0.77, P > 0.05). No positive rodents were found in Haiyuan County. The density of Sp. alashanicus of the survey sites were 3.02-11.48 individual/hm2 (1 hm2 = 10 000 m2). A total of 252 faecal samples from wild definitive hosts, including foxes and wolves, were detected in 3 counties (districts). The positive rate was 1.19% (3/252). All the antigen-positive faeces were from foxes, and the positive rate of fox feces was 2.61% (3/115). The positive rate of fox fecal samples was 3.92% (2/51) in Xiji County and 2.78% (1/36) in Yuanzhou District, with no significant difference between the two counties (χ2 = 0.08, P > 0.05). No positive fecal samples were found in Haiyuan County. Conclusion The positive rate of E. multilocularis coproantigen remained considerably in stray dogs and foxes in Ningxia. The intermediate host, Sp. alashanicus, was found infected with E. multilocularis, indicating that its transmission chain still exists. It is necessary to strengthen investigation, management and deworming in stray dogs and other wild animal hosts.

参考文献

[1] Zhu YY, Wu WP, Guan YY, et al. Cost analysis of dog deworming in echinococcosis control program in Daofu, Sichuan Province[J]. Chin J Parasitol Parasit Dis, 2016, 34(2): 144-149. (in Chinese)
  (朱曜宇, 伍卫平, 官亚宜, 等. 四川省道孚县棘球蚴病防治中犬驱虫成本分析[J]. 中国寄生虫学与寄生虫病杂志, 2016, 34(2): 144-149.)
[2] Zhang MY, Wu WP, Guan YY, et al. Analysis on disease burden of hydatid disease in China[J]. Chin J Parasitol Parasit Dis, 2018, 36(1): 15-19, 25. (in Chinese)
  (张梦媛, 伍卫平, 官亚宜, 等. 我国棘球蚴病疾病负担分析[J]. 中国寄生虫学与寄生虫病杂志, 2018, 36(1): 15-19, 25.)
[3] Wu WP, Wang H, Wang Q, et al. A nationwide sampling survey on echinococcosis in China during 2012—2016[J]. Chin J Parasitol Parasit Dis, 2018, 36(1): 1-14. (in Chinese)
  (伍卫平, 王虎, 王谦, 等. 2012—2016年中国棘球蚴病抽样调查分析[J]. 中国寄生虫学与寄生虫病杂志, 2018, 36(1): 1-14.)
[4] Wu XL, Duan HJ, Qi RT, et al. Evaluation of the effect of the integrated echinococcosis control program in Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region from 2011 to 2018[J]. Chin J Schisto Control, 2020, 32(6): 598-604. (in Chinese)
  (吴向林, 段红菊, 齐蓉婷, 等. 2011—2018年宁夏回族自治区棘球蚴病综合防治效果[J]. 中国血吸虫病防治杂志, 2020, 32(6): 598-604.)
[5] Zhao JH, Wu XL, Ma R, et al. Analysis of hydatid disease prevalence survey in Ningxia in 2012[J]. Ningxia Med J, 2014, 36(4): 314-316. (in Chinese)
  (赵建华, 吴向林, 马荣, 等. 宁夏2012年棘球蚴病流行现况调查分析[J]. 宁夏医学杂志, 2014, 36(4): 314-316.)
[6] Yang SJ, Liu H, Li BF, et al. Epidemiological investigation on echinococcosis infection in small mammals in Shiqu County of Sichuan Province, China in 2016[J]. Chin J Vector Biol Control, 2018, 29(3): 235-238, 249. (in Chinese)
  (杨诗杰, 刘辉, 李奔福, 等. 四川省石渠县2016年小兽感染棘球蚴情况调查分析[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2018, 29(3): 235-238, 249.)
[7] Niu YL, Wu WP. Research advances on distribution characteristics of and factors associated with fecal contamination by definitive hosts of Echinococcus spp.[J]. Chin J Parasitol Parasit Dis, 2016, 34(1): 70-74. (in Chinese)
  (牛彦麟, 伍卫平. 棘球绦虫终宿主粪便污染分布特征及影响因素的研究进展[J]. 中国寄生虫学与寄生虫病杂志, 2016, 34(1): 70-74.)
[8] Shi DD, Kui Y, Han S, et al. Spatial cluster analysis of echinococcosis in the eastern Qinghai-Tibet Plateau from 2016 to 2020[J]. J Trop Parasitol, 2022, 20(2): 64-68. (in Chinese)
  (施丹丹, 蒉嫣, 韩帅, 等. 2016—2020年青藏高原东部地区棘球蚴病空间聚集性分析[J]. 热带病与寄生虫学, 2022, 20(2): 64-68.)
[9] Yang SJ, Wang QY, Wang J, et al. Surveillance for hydatidosis in Emin, Xinjiang, 2007—2013[J]. Dis Surveillance, 2015, 30(2): 130-133. (in Chinese)
  (杨诗杰, 王钦琰, 王静, 等. 2007—2013年新疆维吾尔自治区额敏县包虫病监测结果分析[J]. 疾病监测, 2015, 30(2): 130-133.)
[10] Weng XD, Mu ZQ, Wang X, et al. Prevalence of echinococcosis in small mammals in Shiqu County, Sichuan Province[J]. J Pathog Biol, 2019, 14(11): 1320-1323. (in Chinese)
  (翁晓东, 慕志强, 王旭, 等. 四川省石渠县啮齿类动物棘球蚴感染情况调查[J]. 中国病原生物学杂志, 2019, 14(11): 1320-1323.)
[11] Wu XL, Yan F, Duan HJ, et al. Surveillance of echinococcosis in Ningxia in 2020[J]. Chin J Parasitol Parasit Dis, 2022, 40(2): 242-247. (in Chinese)
  (吴向林, 闫芳, 段红菊, 等. 2020年宁夏回族自治区棘球蚴病监测结果分析[J]. 中国寄生虫学与寄生虫病杂志, 2022, 40(2): 242-247.)
[12] Guo BP, Guo G, Zhang L, et al. Investigation on infection of Echinococcus multilocularis in small rodents in Chabchar County, Xinjiang[J]. Chin J Parasitol Parasit Dis, 2021, 39(3): 327-334. (in Chinese)
  (郭宝平, 郭刚, 张莉, 等. 新疆察布查尔县小型啮齿类动物多房棘球蚴感染情况调查[J]. 中国寄生虫学与寄生虫病杂志, 2021, 39(3): 327-334.)
[13] Zhang T, Lu ST. Analysis on the investigation of plague natural foci in the Loess Plateau of Ningxia from 1962 to 2014[J]. Chin J Hyg Insectic Equip, 2019, 25(1): 53-56. (in Chinese)
  (张涛, 卢世堂. 1962—2014年宁夏黄土高原鼠疫自然疫源地调查分析[J]. 中华卫生杀虫药械, 2019, 25(1): 53-56.)
[14] Gong S, Wu WP, Yan XL, et al. Investigation on distribution of alveolar echinococcosis in human and infection of intermediate host in Tibet Autonomous Region[J]. J Pathog Biol, 2017, 12(12): 1175-1179. (in Chinese)
  (贡桑曲珍, 伍卫平, 严信留, 等. 西藏自治区人体泡型包虫病分布及中间宿主感染调查[J]. 中国病原生物学杂志, 2017, 12(12): 1175-1179.)
[15] Wang YY, Jiang XF, Hao HX, et al. Analysis on the epidemiological characteristics and control effect of echinococcosis in Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region from 2010 to 2019[J]. J Trop Dis Parasitol, 2021(1): 6-9, 31. (in Chinese)
  (王玉莹, 姜晓峰, 郝慧霞, 等. 2010—2019年内蒙古自治区棘球蚴病流行特征及防治效果分析[J]. 热带病与寄生虫学, 2021(1): 6-9, 31.)
[16] Duan HJ, Wu XL, Qi RT, et al. Analysis of surveillance results of echinococcosis in Ningxia in 2017[J]. Chin J Parasitol Parasit Dis, 2019, 37(4): 433-436. (in Chinese)
  (段红菊, 吴向林, 齐蓉婷, 等. 2017年宁夏棘球蚴病监测结果分析[J]. 中国寄生虫学与寄生虫病杂志, 2019, 37(4): 433-436.)
文章导航

/

〈 〉