中国寄生虫学与寄生虫病杂志

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

2015年湖北省寄生虫病防治技术竞赛结果分析

吴家利,涂祖武,裴速建,张华勋,朱红,蔡顺祥,唐丽*   

  1. 湖北省疾病预防控制中心,武汉 430079
  • 出版日期:2016-04-30 发布日期:2016-06-30

Competition Results of Parasitic Disease Control Techniques among Technician in Hubei Province in 2015

WU Jia-li, TU Zu-wu, PEI Su-jian, ZHANG Hua-xun, ZHU Hong, CAI Shun-xiang, TANG li*   

  1. Hubei Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Wuhan 430079, China
  • Online:2016-04-30 Published:2016-06-30

摘要: 目的 通过对2015年湖北省寄生虫病防治技术竞赛成绩的分析,了解湖北省寄生虫病防治专业人员的业务能力。 方法 2015年5月,组织全省17个市(州)68名寄生虫病防治专业人员参加理论知识和技能操作两个方面的竞赛,收集整理各项成绩数据,导入SPSS18.0软件,对得分情况进行描述性分析,并采用t检验和方差分析做分组比较。 结果 68名参赛选手理论知识平均成绩为77.6分,及格率为76.5%;血片制作平均成绩为9.3分,及格率为98.5%;疟原虫检测平均成绩为14.2分,及格率为32.4%;加藤片制作平均成绩为8.6分,及格率为98.5%;蠕虫卵检测平均成绩为22.6分,及格率为27.9%。女选手的理论知识成绩(84.5±17.3)和血片制作成绩(9.4±0.4)均高于男选手(70.7±21.1和9.1±0.9)(P<0.05);县(市、区)级选手的疟原虫检测(16.3±8.0)和蠕虫卵检测成绩(25.8±12.0)均优于市(州)级选手(12.5±6.5和20.0±10.8)(P<0.05);有血防任务地区的选手理论知识成绩(84.4±18.4)和蠕虫卵检测成绩(25.4±11.0)均高于无血防任务地区的选手(61.1±14.7和16.0±10.8)(P<0.05);不同年龄和职称的选手,各项成绩间的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。 结论 湖北省2015年寄生虫病防治技术竞赛中参赛选手的整体成绩良好,但存在地区间检测技术能力不均衡的问题,镜检阅片能力也有待提高。

关键词: 寄生虫病检测, 竞赛, 成绩分析, 湖北省

Abstract: Objective To understand the qualification of technicians in parasitic disease control in Hubei Province by analyzing the rusults of technique competition in 2015. Methods Provincial competitions on basic knowledge and on skills were conducted among 68 technicians in 17 cities (prefectures) in May 2015. The results were collected and analyzed with SPSS18.0 software. Scores were descriptively analyzed, and group comparisons were made by t-test and ANOVA. Results The average score of the 68 competitors was 77.6, with a passing rate of 76.5%. In detail, the average scores of blood slide-making, Plasmodium detection, Kato-Katz slide-making and helminth egg detection were 9.3(passing rate, 98.5%), 14.2 (32.4%), 8.6 (98.53%) and 22.6 (27.9%) respectively. The average scores on theoretical knowledge and blood slide-making of female competitors were (84.5±17.3) and (9.4±0.4), respectively, significantly higher than those of the males (70.7±21.1, 9.1±0.9 respectively) (P<0.05). The scores of Plasmodium microscopy and egg microscopy were higher in competitors from counties[(16.3±8.0), (25.8±12.0)] than in those from cities/prefectures [(12.5±6.5), (20.0±10.8)] (P<0.05). In addition, the average scores on theoretical knowledge and egg dection were higher in competitors from districts with schistosomiasis control task [(84.4±18.4), (25.4±11.0)] than in those from areas without schistosomiasis control task[(61.1±14.7), (16.0±10.8)](P<0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in scores of various items among competitors of different ages and with professional ranks (P>0.05). Conclusion There is a good overall performance among the professionals but an imbalance in detecting capability in different areas. The microscopic examination skill also needs to be improved.

Key words: Parasitic disease detection, Competition, Score analysis, Hubei Province